Notices
997 Forum 2005-2012
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Tire Wear?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-15-2015, 02:51 PM
  #16  
Macster
Race Director
 
Macster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Centerton, AR
Posts: 19,034
Likes: 0
Received 252 Likes on 222 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by sjfehr
Toe out will eat tires pretty quickly, and rear toe out makes the car handle really dangerously, too. Keep the camber and realign for a little toe in, which is fine. Since this is just for street use, Porsche spec alignment and camber should be fine.

And if you're not at least occasionally driving this car like a sports car, tsk tsk on you, you might as well have bought a mercedes or jaguar or something.
I think you have it backwards. A little toe out at the rear is required as when the car is moving down the road under power the rear tires tend to move forward and the toe out becomes nil.

Toe in means the tires swing in even more and the toe in becomes even more excessive.
Old 03-15-2015, 02:57 PM
  #17  
Wayne Smith
Rennlist Member
 
Wayne Smith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 5,120
Received 1,195 Likes on 762 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by smokestack20
Bruce,

Yup, The camber setting was my original thought for my tire wear. Mine was exactly as yours.... the inner rears were worn to the canvas.
No expert here, but camber and toe make some logical sense to me for that type of wear.

Hope to find a knowledgeable experienced local guy to solve the problem. At the very least I have some reference from all you list members. Thanks!

KV
A few months ago my rears went to cords on the inside with seemingly little warning.

So now ...

As a DD up and down the freeway I set my tire pressure at the rear to 44 cold. This pushes the tread at the center down and reduces pressure on the inside. But on the fun roads the tires bounce off the pavement and the car skitters. So I drop the rears to 37 cold for those roads.

This is still experimental, but with 5K on new tires things seem to be working. It is a bit of a pain, but life offers compromises, and changing air pressure seems to be better than changing tires.

Oh, and I did slightly reduce the rear toe. And I confess to a couple of driving style changes as my fun driving now involves only Sport Plus and manual shift control of the PDK. So I am dealing with multiple variables.

YMMV!
Old 03-15-2015, 02:59 PM
  #18  
Macster
Race Director
 
Macster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Centerton, AR
Posts: 19,034
Likes: 0
Received 252 Likes on 222 Posts
Default

I suspect along with the less camber the toe was changed and it was the toe that resulted in the reduction in tire wear.

I get to follow Porsches down the road once in a while and under way the rear tires loose their camber and the tires become as near as I can tell vertical.

As I have mentioned before the alignment settings are settings that are applied and measured and in effect with the car stationary. What the settings become when the car is actually underway is something else.

I hate to keep beating this subject to death but too many Porsche owners accept horrible tire life with uneven -- and potentially dangerous -- rear tire wear as the norm for these cars but it is not the norm.

For street driving one can have a good handling, a car with the road feel we all love and enjoy, with good rear tire life, with good even tire wear.

All it takes is the proper alignment.
Old 03-15-2015, 05:12 PM
  #19  
sjfehr
Drifting
 
sjfehr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Chesapeake, VA
Posts: 3,029
Received 65 Likes on 55 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Bruce In Philly
My opinion differs from those who point to rear toe as the wear culprit (absolutely improper toe will wear tires). For me, it was the camber. I wore out my rears really fast but only on the inside all the way down to the cords.... I had no idea as the rest of the tread looked darn good (my first 911).

I had an alignment done and took out much of the negative camber in the rears and my winter and summer tires are experiencing perfect, even wear. The toe was within spec before my alignment. My rear camber is just outside of spec now.

Notice how our cars sit with obviously canted rear wheels (tops in, bottoms out). Now in your mind (and I have an active one), make the tires five feet wide. Where is the wear going to occur? Our rear tires are already really wide.
Camber alone won't do it; plenty of Porsches out there with a lot of rear camber and a little rear toe in have decent wear. These are pneumatic tires and the contact patch still encompasses the whole tire. The inside will wear a little faster than the out due to the extra pressure from the sidewall, but only a little faster. Cars that are driven hard will roll over onto the outer corner in turns and will actually eat the outer corner faster than the inner- I've gone through probably 10 sets of rear tires in the last 6 years and never had a rear tire wear out on the inside before the out.

The combination of high camber and toe in is well known to cause highly accelerated inner tire wear. This happened to me once on the fronts- because I had done an DIY alignment with as much camber as I could get and a little toe out for crisper turn-in. Corded the inside corner in 3000 miles. Realigned for neutral toe after that, still with as much negative camber as I could get, but never had another problem.

Originally Posted by Bruce In Philly
Regarding poorer handling... I am not so sure about this. Remember that car companies tweak their suspensions for performance but also safety. When I did my rears, I also had them put more negative camber in the front. The car went from boringly stable to a bit lively.... not twitchy, but more like my 2000 Boxster was from the factory. I am very happy with this change as I was a bit disappointed with my 2009 C2S's handling being pretty darn Buick like. Talk to those who track their cars and one of the quickest things they learn is to tweak the alignment. The reasons are many, but there is no perfect alignment for a Porsche. We love to think our cars are the top of performance from the factory tweaked by engineers who are monks on the weekends and only use special wrenches.... yadda yadda... but the engineers, with the marketing department, come up with a compromise that balances performance (twitchy track like), comfort (stable straight on the highway), and safety (a bit of understeer) as it is best for their target market. And note that Porsche has expanded their eyes on a broader market than just the performance-oriented enthusiast. Remember how even today, the car reviewers talk about the dangers of a rear engined Porsche? Do you think Porsche wants to give any fodder to this line of dialog?

YMMV.... this is just my opinion.

Peace
Bruce in Philly
You're spot-on here. If this is a 100% street car, stick with Porsche's recommended alignment range and you should be happy. Everything is a compromise, and the right choices for you depend on what your priorities are. A little wider tires in the front, little more front camber, and you can completely chance the handling to make it more balanced... but you probably don't want to do that unless you're competing. If you're only driving spirited on the street you should never reach the point of breaking traction on either end, and thus it's irrelevant to the fun factor if your car understeers at the limit, but definitely important to the safety factor that it doesn't oversteer.

I used to curse understeer until I had a car that tended towards oversteer. Gave me a bit more appreciation for slightly balanced towards understeer

Originally Posted by Macster
I think you have it backwards. A little toe out at the rear is required as when the car is moving down the road under power the rear tires tend to move forward and the toe out becomes nil.

Toe in means the tires swing in even more and the toe in becomes even more excessive.
Toe out in the rear will not only kill the tires, it will make it unstable in corners and prone to snap-oversteer, and virtually impossible to control when the rear end slides out. Track alignments are a little toe-out in the front to aid in turn-in, and a little toe-in in the rear for handling. Tweaked from there with camber, springs, sway bar and shock settings.

Street alignment is slight toe-in both front and rear for stability and tire wear.
Old 03-15-2015, 07:14 PM
  #20  
Johnny DB
Rennlist Member
 
Johnny DB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Ontario
Posts: 1,980
Likes: 0
Received 134 Likes on 108 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Macster
I suspect along with the less camber the toe was changed and it was the toe that resulted in the reduction in tire wear.

I get to follow Porsches down the road once in a while and under way the rear tires loose their camber and the tires become as near as I can tell vertical.

As I have mentioned before the alignment settings are settings that are applied and measured and in effect with the car stationary. What the settings become when the car is actually underway is something else.

I hate to keep beating this subject to death but too many Porsche owners accept horrible tire life with uneven -- and potentially dangerous -- rear tire wear as the norm for these cars but it is not the norm.

For street driving one can have a good handling, a car with the road feel we all love and enjoy, with good rear tire life, with good even tire wear.

All it takes is the proper alignment.
Any way you can get your alignment specs and post them?



Quick Reply: Tire Wear?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 03:29 PM.