Notices
997 Forum 2005-2012
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

why did you choose a 997.1 or 997.2?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-18-2014, 01:00 PM
  #16  
Ezkill
Racer
 
Ezkill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 423
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Never considered the scraping issue but it's a good point. I've heard it twice in my regular car since I purchased it and that was going down a small looking gas station incline one tire at a time at like 1/2 mile an hour. As far as I can tell the light scrape was on a black rubber plastic piece under the car. No paint damage and no noticeable damage on the black piece either but it happened.
Old 06-18-2014, 01:06 PM
  #17  
Tcc1999
Three Wheelin'
 
Tcc1999's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Napa Valley, CA
Posts: 1,722
Received 73 Likes on 44 Posts
Default

Had an '08 that was coming off lease 3/12. While the 991 may be an awesome car, I just couldn't love it. The '08 was great but I only had a desire for one more 911 and it wasn't going to be a 991 variant so I bought out and sold my '08 and was able to get one of the last custom builds on a '12 GTS that I can't see myself getting rid of unless I am physically unable to drive it.
Old 06-18-2014, 01:14 PM
  #18  
alexb76
Rennlist Member
 
alexb76's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 5,900
Received 83 Likes on 60 Posts
Default

Well, for me when I bought my 997.1, 997.2 was just released and 997.1 had much better value vs. 997.2... plus, I absolutely love 997.1 exhaust note and engine tone vs. 997.2 which is much muted in comparison.

Today however, if I wanted to buy a 997, the .2 might be a better option due to the upgrades. To me, HP actually is not that significant of an upgrade (unless you're looking at GTS), but the following is something you could never get on 997.1:
- LED lights
- PDK
- PCM with touchscreen and Bluetooth
- Sports PASM (lower than PASM)
- LSD

In my honest opinion, if none of these 4-5 options are must-haves for a buyer, then I'd buy the car that has the most options that your looking (Leather, PDK, etc..) for at the best price between 2006-2010 997s.

Good luck!
Old 06-18-2014, 02:22 PM
  #19  
jmt053
Advanced
 
jmt053's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Sacramento Area
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I never really considered the .1 as I had read enough about the IMS issues to keep me away from them. I also preferred the updated electronics, etc. Ultimately what pushed me was the deal. I have purchased several cars from this local broker and he had taken in a 2010 Turbo and a 2011 C4S so he was sitting on a fair amount of inventory dollar wise, as he is not a big scale broker. The C4S had only 4300 miles and was a MT which was one of my requirements. He had it advertised for $80K, offered it to me for $76K. The car had a TechArt wing and a Tubi exhaust installed (almost a deal killer), but the OEM parts were included with the car. I had the wing and exhaust removed and sold them for another $2K (for both). Brought my cost closer to $74K and that isn't bad for a 2011 C4S with original and CPO warranty for a total of 3 years from when I bought it.
Old 06-18-2014, 02:55 PM
  #20  
Schpee007
Pro
 
Schpee007's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Westminster, CO
Posts: 583
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Philster
The front bumper and lip are so low that I have to plan out where I can get gas and stop on road trips. I use Google street view or call ahead, because she ain't getting up many driveway aprons at many gas stations and other stores.

.
Phil,

Do you know how much lower the aero bumper reaches compared to stock? Is your car lower than a stock S? I think about adding it someday, but if it makes for a constant worry DD experience then maybe a bad idea.
Old 06-18-2014, 03:03 PM
  #21  
destro
Rennlist Member
 
destro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Toronto
Posts: 450
Received 10 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

I lusted for a 997.1 GT3 for years, when I was finally ready to buy (early 2013) GT3 prices rose beyond my budget.
A 997.2 C2S was my plan B, slightly less power, slightly more torque, and cheaper to maintain / get parts for, and bought mine with warranty which saved me a few hundred $ in repairs already.

The reason why I didn’t get a 997.1 C2S even thought I test drove one and it felt awesome / fast enough.

For 997.2
+ LSD & Sport PASM
+ PCM with bluetooth and ipod integration
+ More aggressive looks (many 997.1 owners I know updated lights and even bumpers to 997.2 already)
+ Engine Reliability (sure DFI is still new, but with 40% less parts, and out of the ~10 guys with 997.1s I know 2 of them had engine replacements), no worry of IMS, RMS or scoring cylinders in these engines as far as I know.
+ revised front end suspension/aero, the car is much more planted at higher speeds 100mph+
+ More rare, atleast with the Carrera S: 997.1 C2S - 6700 cars, 997.2 C2S - 2500 cars sold in the US. There were just much less 997.2s sold, likely due to the economic crash.

For 997.1
+ Its louder (but with Sports Exhaust and X-Pipe, the 997.2 can match it).
+ More body kit options for much less $ if you’re into that sort of thing
Old 06-18-2014, 04:22 PM
  #22  
Dark Helmet
Instructor
 
Dark Helmet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Lincoln, Nebraska
Posts: 183
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

997.1

$$$$$

and '05 because servicable IMS bearing.
Old 06-18-2014, 05:00 PM
  #23  
tgavem
Three Wheelin'
 
tgavem's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Houston
Posts: 1,948
Received 196 Likes on 117 Posts
Default

If you can afford it, go for the .2 because;
Direct injection engine and 40% fever parts and no IMS
+ 30 hp on the direct injection motor
New starter cable so don't have to replace, like on the .1 (labor is $800)
Updated center console and better NAV.
Old 06-18-2014, 06:02 PM
  #24  
Chrono
Rennlist Member
 
Chrono's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Florida
Posts: 534
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

I bought a point 1 and strapped $15,000 cash to the hood as an ornament.
Old 06-18-2014, 06:18 PM
  #25  
Dartmouth
Burning Brakes
 
Dartmouth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Jersey Shore
Posts: 771
Received 120 Likes on 65 Posts
Default

997.02 1. PDK, 2. Direct Injection, 3. Updated and more contemporary Center Console including better Nav., SAT, music inputs USB, ipod, aux, 4. 380 hp on S version. 5. Better manufactured engine. Go for the 997.02. You'll be glad you did.
Old 06-18-2014, 06:20 PM
  #26  
tomc_mets
Sir Thomas Lord of All Mets Fans
Rennlist Member
 
tomc_mets's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Texas
Posts: 10,983
Received 113 Likes on 90 Posts
Default

IMS issue + found a .2 in exact color combo (Guards Red, beige interior) I wanted @ reasonable price. Also, targeted newest model year Carrera S model that fit w/in my target price range.
Old 06-18-2014, 07:29 PM
  #27  
Philster
Three Wheelin'
 
Philster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Greater Philadelphia Area, USA
Posts: 1,550
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Schpee007
Phil,

Do you know how much lower the aero bumper reaches compared to stock? Is your car lower than a stock S? I think about adding it someday, but if it makes for a constant worry DD experience then maybe a bad idea.
With a full tank of gas and my son and me sitting in the car, it's between 3.5" and 3.75" of ground clearance.

I don't know how this differs from stock, non-Aero cars, because the entire front of the car/bumper is different than stock. I can't measure up to where the front lip spoiler meets the bumper because Aero bumpers are unique (you seem to know this).

The whole ground clearance issue is exacerbated by the front wheels being quite far from the front lip.

.
Old 06-18-2014, 08:06 PM
  #28  
txhoosier
Instructor
 
txhoosier's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 106
Received 15 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

997.1 for me because:

1. Got one with 20k miles, HALF of sticker. Probably won't fall much more. 997.2 are newer, perhaps further to depreciate.
2. The $$$ spent was my personal limit for a second carrera
3. Gizmos aren't important, but I do like that the air actually works..........

Again, this was what drove my decision. Hell, I don't even listen to the radio when I drive her, I certainly don't want to talk to anyone.......
Old 06-18-2014, 09:31 PM
  #29  
oalvarez
Three Wheelin'
 
oalvarez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: los angeles
Posts: 1,341
Received 53 Likes on 36 Posts
Default

a good and fun question. for me it boiled down to pure economics coupled with the following criteria;

-2007 or newer daily driver (the '87 is a low mileage garage queen)
-low miles (15k or less)
-immaculate condition (i like nice things)
-S version w/ manual transmission
-silver or black
-California car

To make a long story short, there weren't many to choose from, but low and behold, one was available for sale about 5 miles from where we live. Low mileage examples fetch a premium, at least that's what my research taught me, and given my list, I knew the car wasn't going to come "cheap." Would I have bought a 997.2 at the same price with the same matching criteria? Absolutely, and I could see that being my next car, that or a 991.

This is my second 997, but my first S.

Last edited by oalvarez; 06-18-2014 at 10:00 PM.
Old 06-18-2014, 09:41 PM
  #30  
Gonzo911
Rat Balls
Rennlist Member
 
Gonzo911's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Scottsdale AZ, USA
Posts: 3,636
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

997.2---I have driven an 03 996 for the past 3 years and felt it was time for a "newer' car. There is nothing wrong with a 997.1, but in my opinion, the 997.2 is the best 911 out there, including the 991. Last week I brought home a 2012 997 Cab. The car is amazing, love the interior and the power. I will hopefully have this car for a long time.


Quick Reply: why did you choose a 997.1 or 997.2?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 11:02 PM.