LN Engineering Ceramic upgrade
#1
Race Car
Thread Starter
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I'm debating between the ceramic bearing upgrade and the new IMS Solution from flat-six.
I want to hear from people here who have done the LN bearing upgrade and how many miles are on your car with it, any issues?
I want to hear from people here who have done the LN bearing upgrade and how many miles are on your car with it, any issues?
#2
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I'm pretty sure they are both Jack Raby companies. The solution is more of a detection and warning system from what I read. I could be wrong on both counts.
#3
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
have you posted this question on the 996 board also? in theory, you're only looking at about one half of a production year where 997s would even be a candidate for the upgraded LN bearing. you'll likely find far more people with the LN bearing who own 996s and this will also give you a longer history with the upgrade. i have two close friends with 996s and both have been upgraded.
#4
Race Car
Thread Starter
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Beebe - that's a good suggestion, hopefully some 997 owners who have done it answer here, but might make a thread in 996.
Your two friends who had it done are they members here? Anyway I could ask them questions via pm or email?
I appreciate the info.
Your two friends who had it done are they members here? Anyway I could ask them questions via pm or email?
I appreciate the info.
#5
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I have one of the early '05s with replaceable bearing. I had it done at around 31,000 miles, now have almost 48,000. LN says they should be replaced at 4 yrs/50,000 miles. I don't think the 4 yrs applies to me because I although I only drive 6000 miles/year, I change oil every 6 months per the terms of my B2B extended warranty. So I'm feeling comfortable till she's got 80,000 on the clock. Plus I have the warranty to 75,000. At that time I'll see. But I'm thinking along the lines of another ceramic bearing (assuming they still make them then) because 50,000 miles from then will take me 9 more years!
What concerns me about The Solution is two things. One, it involves a notch being cut between the trans and engine case, and no mention of sealing it up. The second and more important point is the Solution bearing is only lubricated by the pressure-feed line (no splash or immersion oiling as I understand). So if that line gets plugged for any reason, it's goodbye bearing in a matter of minutes. At least that's what a well-known Porsche engine rebuilder told me...and they have their own "solution" coming, a roller bearing (vs ball). With all these "solutions" popping up (the shop that installed my LN is now selling their own pressure-fed flange replacement), it's getting harder to navigate the waters. I personally believe the "dozen or so" failures of the single-row ceramic bearing are all related to either debris present from a failing OEM bearing, and/or improper installation of the retrofit. I don't really think the load rating of the single-row ceramic is the issue, or many, many more of them (OEM and ceramic) should have failed. But as I said, there are a lot of differing opinions these days from those in the know.
What concerns me about The Solution is two things. One, it involves a notch being cut between the trans and engine case, and no mention of sealing it up. The second and more important point is the Solution bearing is only lubricated by the pressure-feed line (no splash or immersion oiling as I understand). So if that line gets plugged for any reason, it's goodbye bearing in a matter of minutes. At least that's what a well-known Porsche engine rebuilder told me...and they have their own "solution" coming, a roller bearing (vs ball). With all these "solutions" popping up (the shop that installed my LN is now selling their own pressure-fed flange replacement), it's getting harder to navigate the waters. I personally believe the "dozen or so" failures of the single-row ceramic bearing are all related to either debris present from a failing OEM bearing, and/or improper installation of the retrofit. I don't really think the load rating of the single-row ceramic is the issue, or many, many more of them (OEM and ceramic) should have failed. But as I said, there are a lot of differing opinions these days from those in the know.
#6
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Here is another angle. You might get some goodwill from Porsche if you have a failure with the ceramic bearing installed (especially if the dealer installs it or if it is a cpo and the last owner put it in) but I can almost guarantee you wont get any help if you have an oil line / solution installed and the engine fails.
Last edited by BED997; 07-25-2013 at 07:06 PM.
#7
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I have one of the early '05s with replaceable bearing. I had it done at around 31,000 miles, now have almost 48,000. LN says they should be replaced at 4 yrs/50,000 miles. I don't think the 4 yrs applies to me because I although I only drive 6000 miles/year, I change oil every 6 months per the terms of my B2B extended warranty. So I'm feeling comfortable till she's got 80,000 on the clock. Plus I have the warranty to 75,000. At that time I'll see. But I'm thinking along the lines of another ceramic bearing (assuming they still make them then) because 50,000 miles from then will take me 9 more years!
What concerns me about The Solution is two things. One, it involves a notch being cut between the trans and engine case, and no mention of sealing it up. The second and more important point is the Solution bearing is only lubricated by the pressure-feed line (no splash or immersion oiling as I understand). So if that line gets plugged for any reason, it's goodbye bearing in a matter of minutes. At least that's what a well-known Porsche engine rebuilder told me...and they have their own "solution" coming, a roller bearing (vs ball). With all these "solutions" popping up (the shop that installed my LN is now selling their own pressure-fed flange replacement), it's getting harder to navigate the waters. I personally believe the "dozen or so" failures of the single-row ceramic bearing are all related to either debris present from a failing OEM bearing, and/or improper installation of the retrofit. I don't really think the load rating of the single-row ceramic is the issue, or many, many more of them (OEM and ceramic) should have failed. But as I said, there are a lot of differing opinions these days from those in the know.
What concerns me about The Solution is two things. One, it involves a notch being cut between the trans and engine case, and no mention of sealing it up. The second and more important point is the Solution bearing is only lubricated by the pressure-feed line (no splash or immersion oiling as I understand). So if that line gets plugged for any reason, it's goodbye bearing in a matter of minutes. At least that's what a well-known Porsche engine rebuilder told me...and they have their own "solution" coming, a roller bearing (vs ball). With all these "solutions" popping up (the shop that installed my LN is now selling their own pressure-fed flange replacement), it's getting harder to navigate the waters. I personally believe the "dozen or so" failures of the single-row ceramic bearing are all related to either debris present from a failing OEM bearing, and/or improper installation of the retrofit. I don't really think the load rating of the single-row ceramic is the issue, or many, many more of them (OEM and ceramic) should have failed. But as I said, there are a lot of differing opinions these days from those in the know.
Trending Topics
#8
Race Car
Thread Starter
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Yes well 2006-2008 has an upgraded bearing and less than 1% of IMS failures.
One thing Jack Raby mentioned to me an email yesterday that there are over 10,000 ceramic bearing upgrades and he knows of less than 15 failures...
One thing Jack Raby mentioned to me an email yesterday that there are over 10,000 ceramic bearing upgrades and he knows of less than 15 failures...
#9
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Would love to see the supporting data for Mr. Raby's 10,000 incident rate estimate.
#10
Race Car
Thread Starter
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Here is another angle. You might get some goodwill from Porsche if you have a failure with the ceramic bearing installed (especially if the dealer installs it or if it is a cpo and the last owner put it in) but I can almost guarantee you wont get any help if you have an oil line / solution installed and the engine fails.
#11
Race Car
Thread Starter
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I have one of the early '05s with replaceable bearing. I had it done at around 31,000 miles, now have almost 48,000. LN says they should be replaced at 4 yrs/50,000 miles. I don't think the 4 yrs applies to me because I although I only drive 6000 miles/year, I change oil every 6 months per the terms of my B2B extended warranty. So I'm feeling comfortable till she's got 80,000 on the clock. Plus I have the warranty to 75,000. At that time I'll see. But I'm thinking along the lines of another ceramic bearing (assuming they still make them then) because 50,000 miles from then will take me 9 more years!
What concerns me about The Solution is two things. One, it involves a notch being cut between the trans and engine case, and no mention of sealing it up. The second and more important point is the Solution bearing is only lubricated by the pressure-feed line (no splash or immersion oiling as I understand). So if that line gets plugged for any reason, it's goodbye bearing in a matter of minutes. At least that's what a well-known Porsche engine rebuilder told me...and they have their own "solution" coming, a roller bearing (vs ball). With all these "solutions" popping up (the shop that installed my LN is now selling their own pressure-fed flange replacement), it's getting harder to navigate the waters. I personally believe the "dozen or so" failures of the single-row ceramic bearing are all related to either debris present from a failing OEM bearing, and/or improper installation of the retrofit. I don't really think the load rating of the single-row ceramic is the issue, or many, many more of them (OEM and ceramic) should have failed. But as I said, there are a lot of differing opinions these days from those in the know.
What concerns me about The Solution is two things. One, it involves a notch being cut between the trans and engine case, and no mention of sealing it up. The second and more important point is the Solution bearing is only lubricated by the pressure-feed line (no splash or immersion oiling as I understand). So if that line gets plugged for any reason, it's goodbye bearing in a matter of minutes. At least that's what a well-known Porsche engine rebuilder told me...and they have their own "solution" coming, a roller bearing (vs ball). With all these "solutions" popping up (the shop that installed my LN is now selling their own pressure-fed flange replacement), it's getting harder to navigate the waters. I personally believe the "dozen or so" failures of the single-row ceramic bearing are all related to either debris present from a failing OEM bearing, and/or improper installation of the retrofit. I don't really think the load rating of the single-row ceramic is the issue, or many, many more of them (OEM and ceramic) should have failed. But as I said, there are a lot of differing opinions these days from those in the know.
#12
Race Car
Thread Starter
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Anyone have recommendations for a tech or Porsche dealership in Florida that has a good track record installing the upgraded LN bearing?
#13
Pro
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I'll play..
My 996 had the IMS replaced at 87,000 when I purchased the car. The original was still in at this time. There was no indication of failure but for me it was worth the peace of mind.
Original bearing has a very slight amount of play found after removing the seals which had been compromised and allowed oil in.
My 996 had the IMS replaced at 87,000 when I purchased the car. The original was still in at this time. There was no indication of failure but for me it was worth the peace of mind.
Original bearing has a very slight amount of play found after removing the seals which had been compromised and allowed oil in.
#14
Race Car
Thread Starter
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I'll play..
My 996 had the IMS replaced at 87,000 when I purchased the car. The original was still in at this time. There was no indication of failure but for me it was worth the peace of mind.
Original bearing has a very slight amount of play found after removing the seals which had been compromised and allowed oil in.
My 996 had the IMS replaced at 87,000 when I purchased the car. The original was still in at this time. There was no indication of failure but for me it was worth the peace of mind.
Original bearing has a very slight amount of play found after removing the seals which had been compromised and allowed oil in.