Notices
997 Forum 2005-2012
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

X 51 and IMS

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-27-2014, 07:31 AM
  #16  
sclemmons
Three Wheelin'
 
sclemmons's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Little Rock
Posts: 1,898
Received 19 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by kkswow12
skip, how many miles on yours,
Bought with 9k. Now has 33k trouble free miles. I only had two claims on the CPO: cup holders, and the driver's side window motor. Still going strong. Looks like the car that Darth Vader ordered for himself, too.
Old 01-27-2014, 11:32 AM
  #17  
StormRune
Rennlist Member
 
StormRune's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 4,069
Received 671 Likes on 359 Posts
Default

Looking at the Auto Atlanta website diagrams at http://www.autoatlanta.com/porsche-p...section=103-10 there are several parts called out as being different for the X51 (all camshaft intake parts) but the Intermediate Shaft parts don't seem to be among those.

Interestingly enough there are two intermediate shafts listed, but the first one seems to be discontinued and replaced by the second one. Maybe this is due to upgrades to address the failure problems. I dunno.
Old 01-27-2014, 12:56 PM
  #18  
gpjli2
Three Wheelin'
 
gpjli2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,412
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Henrik964
Never heard of a x51 with failure though. Spoke to Porsche Sweden about it and they said they had not thougt about it but neither recall of any x51 with failure.

Anyone have input?
This is just #'s. The failure rate is low and there are not that many out there. 996 had x51 kit w old bearing and 997 had x51 w updated bearing. They will behave just like the rest of the lineup wrt bearing failure. Just drive'em and enjoy.
Old 01-27-2014, 01:13 PM
  #19  
alexb76
Rennlist Member
 
alexb76's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 5,900
Received 83 Likes on 60 Posts
Default

Someone should correct me, but I believe X51 was not available at 997 intro, correct? and was offered later in 2005.

If so, by default it must have newer IMS bearings, and the affected ones are always the ones pre-2006 and mid-2005.
Old 01-27-2014, 04:13 PM
  #20  
throttle13
8th Gear
 
throttle13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Germany
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default Cartronic explains in detail (in german) why X51 engines have a higher risk

Hartech and Cartronic mentioned some typical problems affecting Porsche water cooled engines from 1997 to 2008. They both in the engine rebuild business, so they might be biased. But cartronic delivers at least some usefull insights into some feasable (not statistically documented) weak points of the M.96 and M.97 engines.

http://www.hartech.org/porsche_996_9...on_faults.html

http://www.cartronic-motors.com/cartronic_download.php

Cartronic explains in detail (in german) why X51 engines have a higher risk of failures.


PS: I drove with my two Boxster S (2001 and 2007/of course no X51/MT) 144.000 km and 120.000 km without any Problems before sale each.

Last edited by throttle13; 01-27-2014 at 05:35 PM.
Old 01-27-2014, 06:46 PM
  #21  
Perk10
Pro
 
Perk10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: ATL/SW FL
Posts: 584
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by alexb76
Someone should correct me, but I believe X51 was not available at 997 intro, correct? and was offered later in 2005.

If so, by default it must have newer IMS bearings, and the affected ones are always the ones pre-2006 and mid-2005.
The X51 package was made available for the 2006 model year cars and up. The 2006MY's are generally considered to have the larger bearing and therefore you don't hear of X51 cars with IMS failure.
Old 01-28-2014, 09:28 AM
  #22  
Spinout
Burning Brakes
 
Spinout's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: York SC
Posts: 812
Received 25 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

Not apples to apples but I thought I'd mention, since we're talking about the debut of the X51 package, that the 2004 996 40AEs came standard with the X51 power package bumping the HP from 315 to 345. Nice
Old 01-28-2014, 04:47 PM
  #23  
Henrik964
Rennlist Member
 
Henrik964's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Spain
Posts: 819
Received 34 Likes on 19 Posts
Default

http://www.cartronic-motors.com/cartronic_download.php

Cartronic explains in detail (in german) why X51 engines have a higher risk of failures

Well that is theory. It could be like that or not. Still now facts on x51 kitet Engine failures



Quick Reply: X 51 and IMS



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 10:34 AM.