Notices
997 Forum 2005-2012
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Thoughts on this 2005 S Cabrio?????

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-19-2012, 10:29 PM
  #1  
MessyMarvin
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
MessyMarvin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Southwick, MA
Posts: 1,013
Received 13 Likes on 7 Posts
Default Thoughts on this 2005 S Cabrio?????

I am curious what you all think of this car? I was set on ordering a 981 Boxster, but now I am thinking about wanting a back seat due to having 3 kids, at least I would be able to take a few of them at times. Now I am between a CPO 911 Cabrio or New Audi S5 Cabrio.

http://ucl.porsche.de/ucl/plsql/usa/...&pnr_=1&lnr_=5

I have read to stay away from 2005, but after researching I have not found many reasons why. I am a little concerned about the low miles, but it is a CPO so I have 2 years of coverage.

My biggest issue is Owning it past the CPO, would that be a huge concern or do you think IMS/RMS issues would show up in the next 2 years? I will be putting about 8-10K miles a year on it.

Thank you
Old 11-19-2012, 10:34 PM
  #2  
IamSMC
Rennlist Member
 
IamSMC's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 3,686
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by MessyMarvin
I have read to stay away from 2005, but after researching I have not found many reasons why.
Actually, I've heard to stay away from '05s and '06s 3.6s, 3.8s are good from the get go

997 3.6s and/or 3.8s owners please chime in
Old 11-19-2012, 11:02 PM
  #3  
MessyMarvin
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
MessyMarvin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Southwick, MA
Posts: 1,013
Received 13 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Interesting, I did not even pay attention to if it was 3.8 or 3.6 specific.
Old 11-19-2012, 11:04 PM
  #4  
IamSMC
Rennlist Member
 
IamSMC's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 3,686
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by IamSMC
Actually, I've heard to stay away from '05s and '06s 3.6s, 3.8s are good from the get go

997 3.6s and/or 3.8s owners please chime in
Just read this on another thread:
https://rennlist.com/forums/10010894-post7.html
Old 11-19-2012, 11:11 PM
  #5  
AP997S
Pro
 
AP997S's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Las Vegas, Nevada
Posts: 660
Received 14 Likes on 12 Posts
Default

Forum paranoia surrounding IMS failures is the root of this notion. Do as much research as you can and decide if the risk is supported by facts. Nobody can clearly provide failure rates of either the single or double bearing IMS.

I'm sure there have been catastrophic engine failures due to the IMS but without statistical relevant proof it's simply an overstated issue.
Old 11-19-2012, 11:21 PM
  #6  
IamSMC
Rennlist Member
 
IamSMC's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 3,686
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by AP997S
Forum paranoia surrounding IMS failures is the root of this notion. Do as much research as you can and decide if the risk is supported by facts. Nobody can clearly provide failure rates of either the single or double bearing IMS.

I'm sure there have been catastrophic engine failures due to the IMS but without statistical relevant proof it's simply an overstated issue.
Gotta agree with you

I would find it hard to believe IMS failure is an expected issue across the board covering 3.6 and 3.8 motors...



Quick Reply: Thoughts on this 2005 S Cabrio?????



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 09:20 PM.