Notices
997 Forum 2005-2012
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

997.1TT vs. 997.2TT....

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-15-2010, 01:09 PM
  #16  
utkinpol
Rennlist Member
 
utkinpol's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: MA
Posts: 5,902
Received 23 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 1990964C4
You probably would get a good answer in the 997Turbo forum. But I would love to see a pic of your Beluga, please.
as old 997.1 was relatively easy tunable into 700hp area I would personally love to know if new DFI engine allows same power boost as easily or not.
Old 12-15-2010, 06:27 PM
  #17  
yemenmocha
Rennlist Member
 
yemenmocha's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
Posts: 4,019
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by utkinpol
as old 997.1 was relatively easy tunable into 700hp area I would personally love to know if new DFI engine allows same power boost as easily or not.
And the longevity of a non-GT1 engine when this is done or attempted...
Old 12-15-2010, 06:33 PM
  #18  
boolala
Race Car
 
boolala's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 4,019
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Of course that begs the question of why you would even have a need to wring out better performance from the 997.2 TT conisdering that it simply walks away from the first generation car, now doesn't it?
Old 12-15-2010, 06:50 PM
  #19  
cfjan
Rennlist Member
 
cfjan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Sunnyvale, CA
Posts: 2,808
Likes: 0
Received 33 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

I'd guess it is because many of the Gen 1 machines are modified to make more power. Once that's done, the Gen 2 machine might not have such an easy time to "walk away" from it.
Old 12-16-2010, 01:28 AM
  #20  
boolala
Race Car
 
boolala's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 4,019
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Show me a modded gen 1 car whose performance matches that of the new Turbo S................

And how much did it cost to achieve that level of performance (e.g., the ridiculously expensive Ruf modifications)?
Old 12-16-2010, 02:22 AM
  #21  
cfjan
Rennlist Member
 
cfjan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Sunnyvale, CA
Posts: 2,808
Likes: 0
Received 33 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

I was only trying to speculate the reason why people are interested in the durability of the old engine vs. new.. (that's what was being discussed above)

At the 500hps level, both can handle that just fine.. I am sure.. (as the power is still within the design envelope) and then people start to add more power to them..

I wouldn't be surprised if a 650hps gen 1. TT would be faster than the new Turbo S, even given the lack of PDK. How does the new GT2 RS stack up against the Turbo S? (since the GT2RS uses a modified version of the old engine) For sure the 0-60mph the Turbo S will be much faster w/ the launch control and 4WD, but the GT2RS probably will catch up once hooked up..

Anyway, not arguing w/ you regarding whether it makes financial sense or not to mod a gen. 1 TT, but I'm sure someone would do it (because they could).. and then someone who has the gen. 2 would then want to catch up, etc.
Old 12-16-2010, 11:50 AM
  #22  
Riz
Rennlist Member
 
Riz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: USA
Posts: 1,711
Likes: 0
Received 41 Likes on 33 Posts
Default

The turbo S is even quicker than the GT2 RS upto about 120 mph, then the GT2 RS takes over if conditions are right. I just got my turbo S, it really is much better than my stock 09 tt. I have both of them, there is really no comparison. I will still keep my 09 though because it is a manual.
Old 12-16-2010, 12:05 PM
  #23  
cfjan
Rennlist Member
 
cfjan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Sunnyvale, CA
Posts: 2,808
Likes: 0
Received 33 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

Yeah, I'm sure the Turbo S is quicker than the RS at launch.. the PDK combo is hard to beat.. !



Quick Reply: 997.1TT vs. 997.2TT....



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 07:23 AM.