Porsche takes top spot for long term reliability
#16
Put it on a battery tender or perhaps get a new battery
#17
I doubt JD Power's VDS was a consideration when Porsche decided to have the Cayenne skip the 2007 model year, though I suppose it's a possibility.
I just think they should have asterisked the result by noting that Porsche's best-selling, least reliable model was not in the survey. As it is, some people are going to buy Cayenne's based on this #1 ranking.
Frankly, I'm against brand scores in general, since there's really no point to them if a model score is available. There's always quite a bit of variation from model to model within a brand. Did you buy your Porsche because of how the average Porsche performs, of because of how it performs?
I just think they should have asterisked the result by noting that Porsche's best-selling, least reliable model was not in the survey. As it is, some people are going to buy Cayenne's based on this #1 ranking.
Frankly, I'm against brand scores in general, since there's really no point to them if a model score is available. There's always quite a bit of variation from model to model within a brand. Did you buy your Porsche because of how the average Porsche performs, of because of how it performs?
#18
Drifting
odd that there seem to be so many complaints about the survey - maybe we're just an **** bunch.
it's very interesting that there was no 2007 cayenne - very tricky indeed
as for me, i'll take the #1 ranking and not complain about it. every manufacturer here is playing the same game. you can't solely judge by miles, either. some vehicles are in stop and go traffic, some tow things, some are very high performance, some are 30 year old technology that will be very reliable no matter what you do to it because it's not pushing the envelope on new technology or efficiency....
it's very interesting that there was no 2007 cayenne - very tricky indeed
as for me, i'll take the #1 ranking and not complain about it. every manufacturer here is playing the same game. you can't solely judge by miles, either. some vehicles are in stop and go traffic, some tow things, some are very high performance, some are 30 year old technology that will be very reliable no matter what you do to it because it's not pushing the envelope on new technology or efficiency....
So, yeah, reliability like this matters. Bugatti sucks at it, Porsche excels. Maybe not so important for those who can afford a brand new Porsche that's covered under warranty, but it's incredibly useful in the used market where those costs all fall back on us. Also note: this helps your resale value.
#19
Drifting
Yes, it's the third year of ownership, so not exactly "long term."
The real question: how they fare after the 4/50 warranty expires.
I conduct a car reliability survey that updates quarterly and tracks cars continuously as they age. Not covering the 911 yet because need more owners signed up. So I'm grateful that Rennlist has provided permission to post about the survey.
Details here:
Car reliability research
The real question: how they fare after the 4/50 warranty expires.
I conduct a car reliability survey that updates quarterly and tracks cars continuously as they age. Not covering the 911 yet because need more owners signed up. So I'm grateful that Rennlist has provided permission to post about the survey.
Details here:
Car reliability research
#20
Major problems are rare these days. Something like the IMS failures does not happen with many cars. Some cars have more minor problems than others, though. We're finding that the average for cars within the warranty period is about one repair trip for every two cars every year. Some cars have 2+, so the odds of having no repairs, not even a minor one, in a given year are nearly two in three.
I don't think many people realize this. Which is one of the reasons for my survey.
I don't think many people realize this. Which is one of the reasons for my survey.
#21
I have a 2008 911 C2S cab. I leased it in Dec, of '07 and purchased it in Dec.'11.
It now has 45K miles. At the time of purchase, the dealership tried to get me to purchase an aftermarket warranty for about 5K for 3 years. The only things that had failed on the car were an unexpected failure of the water pump (bearing) which was covered under warranty and the right electric window regulator programming, also covered under warranty.
All oil changes, tire replacements, etc., were performed per the owners manual. At the time of purchase, I had been paying appx. $1500/month on the lease
Rather than buy the aftermarket warranty, I decided to open a dedicated savings account for possible future repairs and continued putting the $1500/month I had been paying for the lease into this account instead. Currently I have appx. $40K in the account and other than buying new tires and having a 4-wheel alignment and routine oil changes, I haven't had to spend any of that money on repairs.
I have decided to stop putting this $1500/month into it at this point, having enough to pretty much pay fpr any repair.
These cars ARE reliable, albeit Consumer Reports lists the 2007-2008 911 as a "Used Car to Avoid" in it's latest (April 2013 "Car") issue. Why I don't know.
In the last year they showed the 911 in the reliability ratings survey, it got an 'Excellen't" rating. This year, the 911 is absent from the ratings, although the Boxster is still rated
.
But my car has needed virtually no repairs and instead of an expired aftermarket warranty, I now have $$ to spend if needed.
If it's true that money talks (and BS walks!) mine is yelling: " RELIABLE!!
Buy your Porsche and enjoy it. Get at least a mid to late 80's model if possible as rust problems were pretty much solved by that time in most cars.
Porsche uses a double-dip galvanizing process and despite all- year round use in areas that use salt on the roads I have seen ZERO rust on mine. (Of course, I do wash the car regularly!)
Best of luck with your new Porsche purchase. Just be sure to get a careful PPI.
\(^@^)
It now has 45K miles. At the time of purchase, the dealership tried to get me to purchase an aftermarket warranty for about 5K for 3 years. The only things that had failed on the car were an unexpected failure of the water pump (bearing) which was covered under warranty and the right electric window regulator programming, also covered under warranty.
All oil changes, tire replacements, etc., were performed per the owners manual. At the time of purchase, I had been paying appx. $1500/month on the lease
Rather than buy the aftermarket warranty, I decided to open a dedicated savings account for possible future repairs and continued putting the $1500/month I had been paying for the lease into this account instead. Currently I have appx. $40K in the account and other than buying new tires and having a 4-wheel alignment and routine oil changes, I haven't had to spend any of that money on repairs.
I have decided to stop putting this $1500/month into it at this point, having enough to pretty much pay fpr any repair.
These cars ARE reliable, albeit Consumer Reports lists the 2007-2008 911 as a "Used Car to Avoid" in it's latest (April 2013 "Car") issue. Why I don't know.
In the last year they showed the 911 in the reliability ratings survey, it got an 'Excellen't" rating. This year, the 911 is absent from the ratings, although the Boxster is still rated
.
But my car has needed virtually no repairs and instead of an expired aftermarket warranty, I now have $$ to spend if needed.
If it's true that money talks (and BS walks!) mine is yelling: " RELIABLE!!
Buy your Porsche and enjoy it. Get at least a mid to late 80's model if possible as rust problems were pretty much solved by that time in most cars.
Porsche uses a double-dip galvanizing process and despite all- year round use in areas that use salt on the roads I have seen ZERO rust on mine. (Of course, I do wash the car regularly!)
Best of luck with your new Porsche purchase. Just be sure to get a careful PPI.
\(^@^)
#22
Why people buy a Porsche and then spend all their time agonizing over possible problems that are blown way out of proportion on these sites is interesting to say the least. Can't afford the repairs don't but one. If you can't enjoy the car because the potential repair bills keep you awake at night, don't buy one. Not a must have item. These are expensive toys that nobody really needs. They aren't race cars nor are they particularly practical as your only source of transportion. They are a terrible investment. But, they are a great deal of fun to drive and if you can afford the price of admission, they offer an unique ownership experience.
#23
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Based on my 06 997 & Cayenne N.F.W.
#25
#26
I wholeheartedly agree with porker999 and dadio. Far too often I let the many postings I read on Rennlist make me overthink what I am doing, what I am not doing, what I need to do, etc regarding my Porsche ownership. I need to spend more time behind the wheel enjoying the unique driving experience that only a Porsche can bring and less time watching it sit in the garage worried about the mileage, wear, and tear. Afterall, unless I plan to keep the car until it becomes a antique/classic all I am doing is saving the fun for the next owner. Oh and for the record, I am also a Consumer Reports freak and was taken back by the used cars to avoid comments. The only thing that comes to mind is the IMS bearing issue. Drive on!!!
#27
#29
#30
Why people buy a Porsche and then spend all their time agonizing over possible problems that are blown way out of proportion on these sites is interesting to say the least. Can't afford the repairs don't but one. If you can't enjoy the car because the potential repair bills keep you awake at night, don't buy one. Not a must have item. These are expensive toys that nobody really needs. They aren't race cars nor are they particularly practical as your only source of transportion. They are a terrible investment. But, they are a great deal of fun to drive and if you can afford the price of admission, they offer an unique ownership experience.