Oddball GT3 Question
#1
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Interested in your collective wisdom.....realize this might be a crazy idea.
i have owned in the recent past a 996C4S, 997.1C2S, 997TT. I then have been gone from P-Cars (to F-Car) for the last 12 months and want back.
So I am stuck dead in the middle between a 997C2S.2 (loved the rwd in the past, the lightness of the car) or the new TT (like the power, but last version was a little disconnected and GT like, also like the exclusivity).
Was thinking about a GT3....the problem is this is my daily driver and I head into a couple of conservative business environments. That wing is way too big. But it might have a bit more power, the nimbleness, and the uniqueness.
How stupid (and costly) would it be to take out the GT3 wing and put the C2S real in there? I really just commute in the car and then drive some country roads (never above 100)...is changing the wing really unsafe? Really? Upon sale or real track time (which I no longer do)..could you swap back?
Open to all thoughts!
Thanks
i have owned in the recent past a 996C4S, 997.1C2S, 997TT. I then have been gone from P-Cars (to F-Car) for the last 12 months and want back.
So I am stuck dead in the middle between a 997C2S.2 (loved the rwd in the past, the lightness of the car) or the new TT (like the power, but last version was a little disconnected and GT like, also like the exclusivity).
Was thinking about a GT3....the problem is this is my daily driver and I head into a couple of conservative business environments. That wing is way too big. But it might have a bit more power, the nimbleness, and the uniqueness.
How stupid (and costly) would it be to take out the GT3 wing and put the C2S real in there? I really just commute in the car and then drive some country roads (never above 100)...is changing the wing really unsafe? Really? Upon sale or real track time (which I no longer do)..could you swap back?
Open to all thoughts!
Thanks
#2
Nordschleife Master
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Do not mutilate a GT3. The 997.2S on the street is a better choice and the perf diff is not noticeable (on the street).
#3
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I had a 997 GT3 and now for the last 9 months own and drive a 992.2 C2S with PDK. The new Carrera S is a great car that is enjoyable on the street yet can also be at home on the track. Read the various posts but PDK is the future and the imnprovement in the '09 and newer C2 and C2S are more than the transmission. The new engine is outstanding, the overall handling is improved and the complete package is very very close to a '07-08 GT3.
#4
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I agree with ADias. You'll be a lot happier with a 997.2 C2S than a GT3 if you never track the car. The benefits of a GT3 over a C2S are difficult to discern on the street, and the shortcomings of a GT3 over a C2S on the street are myriad.
That said -- I think you may be overstating how much other people notice the cosmetic differences between a C2S and a GT3. To non-enthusiasts, they're both just "Porsches." The wing doesn't really help or harm your situation and a flashy vs understaded color is going to have a lot more influence over the reaction you get than the aero bodywork does.
That said -- I think you may be overstating how much other people notice the cosmetic differences between a C2S and a GT3. To non-enthusiasts, they're both just "Porsches." The wing doesn't really help or harm your situation and a flashy vs understaded color is going to have a lot more influence over the reaction you get than the aero bodywork does.
#5
Three Wheelin'
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Speaking for myself, when I knew very little about Porsches, by this time I owned a 996 C4 Conv., I thought that the wing of the GT3 was too pronounced and couldn't understand the reasoning of having such a large wing. In my past opinion, the large wing detracted from the beautiful lines of the 911, and believed that it actually made the car look ugly. As my knowledge and driving ability increased my opinion changed. I agree with your initial assessment that the GT3 wing draws more attention. Hence, as a daily driver and the awareness of not wanting to draw too much attention I would opt for the C2S. The C2S is much more comfortable for every day driving and let's be honest, the car is extremely capable and you will not be able to reach it's limits on the roads. The GT3 can be used as a daily driver but it really displays its character when the car is in its environment, that is the track. The C2S will not disappoint you.
#6
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
If you're worried about attracting attention and want to be conservative, do what I did and buy an Orange turbo. Very subtle car.
Trending Topics
#8
Poseur
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Porsche has wrestled with the rear wing issue since the 1970s when they discovered how damn effective it is. It certainly violated the simple lines of hte 911 that Butzi had worked so hard to perfect. But you couldn't overlook the fact that a 911 body looks, in profile, like the wing of an aircraft. As such, it generates lift. Initially, only those with the higher capable turbo cars wound up with them, so they weren't everywhere and in your face. But in time everyone learned that above about 80 miles an hour, the wing made a substantial difference. How could Porsche handle keeping the shape everyone loves, with the aerodynamic aid that is so necessary? One of my previous cars had a smaller turbo tail on it (a Carrera RSR tail) which didn't look THAT big, and so I could deal with it. But it still got a lot of attention, as these cars were still relatively rare. I applaud Porsche in their efforts on the dynamic tails. You get the best of both worlds. You can look like you're on a Sunday drive, but when you need the downforce, it kicks in without your intervention. I highly recommend against modifying the GT3 tail just because of the looks of it. It's that size for a specific reason. If the tail is such a big deal for you, get a Carrera S. (That's why Porsche offers so many models). The GT3 is really a lot of car for daily driving. It has a very heavy clutch feel to it that will just wear you out over time. It's a hell of a car, but it's not for everyone. Nor should it be. If you are forced to be conservative because of your business, then stay conventional with a Carrera. When you want something that's not conservative, go up a notch. What about the 997 Turbo tail? Less in your face?
#9
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I feel it is the best looking wing they have had for a while. Just fell in love with the GT3 while watching the NatGeo factory show.
If you were actually going to drive that car as it should be driven, you would need that wing! At 170mph in my C4S on the Autobahn, I found myself saying wish I had a nice big wing as the front became a little too light for comfort!
If you were actually going to drive that car as it should be driven, you would need that wing! At 170mph in my C4S on the Autobahn, I found myself saying wish I had a nice big wing as the front became a little too light for comfort!
![thumbup](https://rennlist.com/forums/graemlins/thumbup.gif)
#10
Nordschleife Master
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
It appears that you actually needed a more aggressive front splitter to increase downforce in the front. A bigger wing would actually exacerbate the front lift you felt... Aero requires front/rear balance.
#14
Nordschleife Master
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
i was about to make a post about this yesterday, i dont get the powerkit.. just way too much money for the small amount of gain.. i optioned out a c2S with this and is was only 5k short of a Gt3 with similar options.. why would anyone choose a c2S over a Gt3 was my question.... only difference to me is your forced to get a 6speed in the GT3 and you dont have a back seat... but you get so much more.. 435 instead of 408hp, awesome monolug wheels, larger brakes stock, better handling, etc etc etc etc etc etc.
#15
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
i was about to make a post about this yesterday, i dont get the powerkit.. just way too much money for the small amount of gain.. i optioned out a c2S with this and is was only 5k short of a Gt3 with similar options.. why would anyone choose a c2S over a Gt3 was my question.... only difference to me is your forced to get a 6speed in the GT3 and you dont have a back seat... but you get so much more.. 435 instead of 408hp, awesome monolug wheels, larger brakes stock, better handling, etc etc etc etc etc etc.
Now if you want a normally aspirated car with a back seat, PDK, and no wings or side air intakes, that is used primarily daily driving( I'm not in to changing the lip on my front spoiler periodically), I think the powerkit offers a great alternative. May not work for you, but that's what I like about Porsche...you get what you want ....I get what I want.
![Cheers](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/smilies/beerchug.gif)