Notices
997 Forum 2005-2012
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

DFI engine issues?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-07-2009 | 12:23 AM
  #1  
ADias's Avatar
ADias
Thread Starter
Nordschleife Master
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 8,314
Likes: 403
From: Southwest
Default DFI engine issues?

Take a look at this THREAD discussing severe gunk buildup on Cayenne DFI engine's valves.

Will 997.2's 9A1 engines develop this?


Last edited by ADias; 04-07-2009 at 01:05 AM.
Old 04-07-2009 | 01:17 AM
  #2  
OCBen's Avatar
OCBen
Banned
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 15,022
Likes: 12
From: Back in the OC
Default

Looks like an image from my last colonoscopy.

Just kidding.

I haven't had one of those yet. Gunk buildups.
Old 04-07-2009 | 01:31 AM
  #3  
PogueMoHone's Avatar
PogueMoHone
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 3,802
Likes: 0
Default

I have been observing this as well; and it doesn't well for Direct Injection (DI). It makes the argument to stick with the much more reliable GT1 block (sans DI) in the Turbo/GT models.

However two things that I am thinking about (but don't have answers for, yet):-

1) Manufacturers are not stupid, offer extended warranties etc., so they would not expose themselves to a ticking time bomb. therefore is this issue overblown?

2) Direct injection has been around in diesels for a long time, and the longevity of those engines is legendary. So what is different?

As an aside for track activities many sanctioning bodies prohibit high pressure fuel systems (DI) for obvious reasons, so maybe this is non-issue for many here.
Old 04-07-2009 | 02:29 AM
  #4  
ADias's Avatar
ADias
Thread Starter
Nordschleife Master
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 8,314
Likes: 403
From: Southwest
Default

Also... why is this happening on the intake valves? Isn't the flow through those just air?
The exhaust valves should be the same as the standard FI engine.
Old 04-07-2009 | 02:29 AM
  #5  
Edgy01's Avatar
Edgy01
Poseur
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 17,720
Likes: 246
From: Santa Barbara, CA
Default

As I have said before, all Porsche engines have an issue or two. Just give them some time to find out what on the DI engines becomes a serious issue, vice a minor irritant. Let's just wait and see.
Old 04-07-2009 | 03:28 AM
  #6  
ADias's Avatar
ADias
Thread Starter
Nordschleife Master
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 8,314
Likes: 403
From: Southwest
Default

There's also this THREAD discounting the issue...
Old 04-07-2009 | 04:22 AM
  #7  
OCBen's Avatar
OCBen
Banned
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 15,022
Likes: 12
From: Back in the OC
Default

Originally Posted by ADias
There's also this THREAD discounting the issue...
Taking the OP's opening line:

It's widely accepted that when a basically all-new engine or component is introduced, there will be teething problems unforeseen by the manufacturer until it's used in the real world.
That's not necessarily true. Oftentimes a problem is discovered during extensive life cycle testing even before the car (or new engine) is launched into the "real world." But by then it's too late to do anything about it, as the design has already been put to bed, and the scheduled launch date must be rigidly adhered to - barring any safety related issues. The engineers typically incorporate these design changes and refinements into the baseline design as soon as they're realized, but the changes typically won't see the light of day until the next production cycle, which is usually the next model year run. But sometimes, depending on the criticality, these changes get incorporated as soon as parts are available on the assembly line. And those cars that were shipped without them will be subject to a recall notice, as many early 997s were for the weak welds on the exhaust tips.

That's why it's always a good rule of thumb to wait until the next production cycle to buy something brand new, as this DFI engined 997, so that major bugs can be worked out by then.

I seriously doubt this gunk problem will surface on the 911 engines. Isn't the compression ratio much higher on these engines than on the Cayenne's?
Old 04-07-2009 | 10:26 AM
  #8  
Fahrer's Avatar
Fahrer
Three Wheelin'
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,648
Likes: 92
From: NJ
Default

With a DI engine, if there is a buildup of "gunk" on the intake valves and stems, it must be coming from the crankcase ventilation or exhaust gas recirculation if either of these are part of the design. Otherwise, there is just air coming into the cylinder. If that photo is from a DI engine my guess is that it is coming from the crankcase which could mean there is some blow by.
Old 04-07-2009 | 10:47 AM
  #9  
insite's Avatar
insite
Three Wheelin'
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,517
Likes: 4
From: Lesa, Italy & Atlanta, GA
Default

i guess this is the crap that fuel usually cleans from the valves......
Old 04-07-2009 | 12:05 PM
  #10  
mdrums's Avatar
mdrums
Race Director
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 15,358
Likes: 183
From: Tampa
Default

Nice....great for product reliability and a clean enviroment.

My car soots up the exhaust tips like h*ll Porsche has a could car less atitude about these issues.

Corvette Z06 is looking better and better...too bad Vette does not have a dlual clutch type of transmission.
Old 04-07-2009 | 03:34 PM
  #11  
ADias's Avatar
ADias
Thread Starter
Nordschleife Master
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 8,314
Likes: 403
From: Southwest
Default

Originally Posted by Fahrer
With a DI engine, if there is a buildup of "gunk" on the intake valves and stems, it must be coming from the crankcase ventilation or exhaust gas recirculation if either of these are part of the design. Otherwise, there is just air coming into the cylinder. If that photo is from a DI engine my guess is that it is coming from the crankcase which could mean there is some blow by.
Can someone verify if the 997.2 DFI engines use crankcase ventilation or exhaust gas recirculation or not?
Old 04-07-2009 | 05:39 PM
  #12  
ADias's Avatar
ADias
Thread Starter
Nordschleife Master
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 8,314
Likes: 403
From: Southwest
Default

This tells the whole STORY.
Old 04-07-2009 | 08:07 PM
  #13  
Minok's Avatar
Minok
Drifting
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 2,415
Likes: 13
From: Pacific Northwest
Default

Originally Posted by ADias
Take a look at this THREAD discussing severe gunk buildup on Cayenne DFI engine's valves.

Will 997.2's 9A1 engines develop this?
Whats missing form the image (too lazy to see if the thread indicated has it discussed) is how the car was driven and fueled, and that has a lot of impact on what the inside of an engine can look like. If that engine never gets to get up to good operating temps for an extended bit of time because its a 'kids to school and soccer practice' minivan in its use, then I'm sure you will gunk the heck out of any engine.
Old 04-07-2009 | 08:09 PM
  #14  
ADias's Avatar
ADias
Thread Starter
Nordschleife Master
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 8,314
Likes: 403
From: Southwest
Default

Originally Posted by Minok
Whats missing form the image (too lazy to see if the thread indicated has it discussed) is how the car was driven and fueled, and that has a lot of impact on what the inside of an engine can look like. If that engine never gets to get up to good operating temps for an extended bit of time because its a 'kids to school and soccer practice' minivan in its use, then I'm sure you will gunk the heck out of any engine.
Right, but more so on a DFI engine as it lacks the cleansing effect of vaporized gas. It also appears that these reports are appearing more and more on new DFI Cayennes and large numbers in Audis.
Old 04-07-2009 | 08:23 PM
  #15  
axhoaxho's Avatar
axhoaxho
Three Wheelin'
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,485
Likes: 1
From: San Francisco Bay Area, CA
Default

And some 997.2 owners reported exceptionally large amount of soot from the exhaust worried me a little. Consider these cars are virtually new, and if there is already that much soot in the exhaust guess how much would be around the intake valves...

Regards,



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 12:58 AM.