When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Hi,
My brother has one on a 997 4s and he loves it. It
is a TPC superccharger and he had #R automotive install it.
Very expensive. It also took a few months to install
due to the new brackets that had to be fabricated. There
also were some electrical issues. I still need to go for
a ride in his car.
Paul
I am told that it takes 40 hours of labor to install the TPC, that little fact is making me rethink things since I do not usually keeps cars more than a couple years
I remember many posts like this in M3 world. Most are concerned about potential impact on the engine - blow it and be faced with an expensive replacement. Something like RUF (Dinan for BMW) is looked upon with a little more comfort because of the warranty.
Then there's the school of thought that these cars are great as they are - naturally aspirated. If you want boost, then a turbo is perhaps more practical and covered by oem warranty. As far as optimizing the engine - there's always the upgraded intake, software, headers, cats, and exhaust that will let your car breath easier and boost the power / torque to boot (poor man's X51). None of these bolt ons impact warranty in my opinion because you aren't touching the internals. Good old Moss-Ferguson.
I remember many posts like this in M3 world. Most are concerned about potential impact on the engine - blow it and be faced with an expensive replacement. Something like RUF (Dinan for BMW) is looked upon with a little more comfort because of the warranty.
Then there's the school of thought that these cars are great as they are - naturally aspirated. If you want boost, then a turbo is perhaps more practical and covered by oem warranty. As far as optimizing the engine - there's always the upgraded intake, software, headers, cats, and exhaust that will let your car breath easier and boost the power / torque to boot (poor man's X51). None of these bolt ons impact warranty in my opinion because you aren't touching the internals. Good old Moss-Ferguson.
HP should never be significantly changed independently of a car's suspension and brakes. It's a whole package and responsible tuners will address all three components and hence the charges are quite high. Moreover, why anyone would tamper with what I believe is one of the best balanced cars in the world is beyond me.
I don't think you are suggesting that Porsche has failed to engineer the rest of the car in say the X51. They increased the efficiency of the 3.8l engine in the X51 by opening up the intake and headers and providing new software to optimize the new combination to add 26 HP (among other adjustments). But they didn't change the brakes and suspension. To support your position - 26 HP is hardly a significant boost, so the Porsche engineers must have assumed the existing brakes and suspension were adequate.
I think what you are pointing at is adding 100+ HP via a supercharger and how that might impact the balance of the car. Then again, from what I've read RUF will happily add only their supercharger. Surely, they would love to tweak wheels and suspension (lower), but I haven't read that they touch the brakes in their supercharged cars. I honestly don't have an opinion on whether or not companies like RUF should or should not mandate brake and suspension adjustments for any car they modify for significant gains. I am thinking, however, that some adjustment to the intake / exhaust efficiency sounds reasonable to me without changing what are already excellent braking and suspension systems.
To me tampering with the balance does not include things like X51 type increases of efficiency (intake, headers, exhaust, software).
Just what in the world do brakes have to do with horsepower? It takes the same amount of braking ability to stop a car going 150 mph regardless of whether it took the car 10 minutes to get to that speed or 10 seconds.
I think the argument is that HP and speed are relative, and therefore speed and braking/handling are relative. On the street, if you have an additional 150 HP (as an example), the supposition is that you're like to spend more time at higher speeds. And example would be an empty road you used to drive at 60 mph, whereas now you can easily hit 90+ in areas. If the braking is the same, you may be unprepared for the change in speed. At the track, you are likely to lap the track at higher speeds, and therefore the other components may become inadequate.
[QUOTE=gravedgr]On the street, if you have an additional 150 HP (as an example), the supposition is that you're like to spend more time at higher speeds. QUOTE]
I am considering a supercharger as a cheaper alternative to the turbo...and I only want to get to the next stoplight faster...
Just what in the world do brakes have to do with horsepower? It takes the same amount of braking ability to stop a car going 150 mph regardless of whether it took the car 10 minutes to get to that speed or 10 seconds.
That's hysterical. My MB dealer tried to tell me the same thing when with 14,000 miles on my E55 both front rotors were cracked. Now mind you the car was never tracked, the "brake warning" light never came on, but they told me due to the "chip" in my car the brakes prematurely failed. To this day I'm still floored by that comment. I asked them to explain to me how if you had two E55's one stock, the other modded and ran them both from 0-150 what is the difference? Mine might get there a bit faster, but we're both stopping from 150! They didn't get it.
There are a number of folks over on 6speedonline with superchargers including one post of someone who had it removed IIRC.
I think the Ruf kit is probably the best way to go because of the warranty thing. Still, you're talking about adding about 20,000 USD in mods to the car and for that money you could come close to buying a turbo and not have the worries associated with heavy mods.
Check out 6Speed though - I know there are a few blown cars there.
Theon Goes Full Carbon Fiber With Stunning New Build
Slideshow: Built around a carbon-bodied 964 and a naturally aspirated 4.0-liter flat-six, this bespoke commission highlights how far the restomod formula has evolved.
Tuner Is Converting Porsche 911s Into Shooting Brakes
Slideshow: A Polish Porsche specialist is moving ahead with one of the most unusual 911 conversions in recent memory: a shooting brake version of the 991-generation sports car.
This Coachbuilt Creation Is A Modern Take on the Legendary Porsche 917
Slideshow: A Porsche Carrera GT has been transformed into a one-off coachbuilt machine that blends analog supercar engineering with styling inspired by the legendary 917 race cars.
Is This Convertible Cayenne A Steal, Or A Returnless Investment?
Slideshow: A heavily modified Porsche Cayenne convertible with faux wood trim and a long list of flaws recently sold at auction for surprisingly little money.
Porsche's Top 5 Most Questionable Naming Decisions
Slideshow: For a company obsessed with engineering precision, Porsche has occasionally named its cars in ways that left even loyal enthusiasts scratching their heads.
Pogea Racing's 964 Porsche 911 Reimagination Stands Out in a Crowded Field
Slideshow: Pogea Racing's latest Porsche 964 project blends carbon-fiber construction, modern chassis upgrades, and up to 500 horsepower while keeping the air-cooled 911 experience firmly analog.