Notices
997 Forum 2005-2012
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

997.2 3.6 dyno. vs E46 and F355

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-14-2019, 10:42 PM
  #1  
INTMD8
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
INTMD8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Lake Villa IL
Posts: 767
Received 261 Likes on 143 Posts
Default 997.2 3.6 dyno. vs E46 and F355

Dyno run is from my 2010 base carrera 3.6, manual trans. Dynojet 248. I have no real plans to mod the car, was just curious what it would put down and thought I would post the results if it happens to interest anyone.

Also overlayed the graph first against my (now sold) E46 M3, completely stock and against my 95 F355. (cat delete and capristo muffler)

They were all done some time apart but on the same dyno by the same operator (me).

All runs were done in 5th gear, for all cars.

997-



997 and M3-



997/M3/F355-

The following users liked this post:
997ajk (08-28-2022)
Old 05-15-2019, 09:25 AM
  #2  
Petza914
RL Community Team
Rennlist Member
 
Petza914's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Clemson, SC
Posts: 25,316
Received 6,171 Likes on 3,935 Posts
Default

Neat. I'd have thought the M3 would be stronger, and it's also impressive the way the Ferrari keeps making power at the high RPMs.
Old 05-15-2019, 10:36 AM
  #3  
Bruce In Philly
RL Community Team
Rennlist Member
 
Bruce In Philly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 5,985
Likes: 0
Received 1,419 Likes on 861 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Petza914
Neat. I'd have thought the M3 would be stronger, and it's also impressive the way the Ferrari keeps making power at the high RPMs.
That what my first reaction also.... so what is it about the Ferrari engine design that does that?

I read in Christophorous... about 15 years ago.... in an interview with a Porsche engineer that one of their engine design objectives was to flatten the torque curve and and provide more torque earlier in the range. Honestly, I was appalled when I read that. For me, it told me that Porsche was catering to the poser market who did not know how to drive a sports car. You know, someone who floors it without downshifting. But anywho......

Peace
Bruce in Philly
Old 05-15-2019, 10:46 AM
  #4  
INTMD8
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
INTMD8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Lake Villa IL
Posts: 767
Received 261 Likes on 143 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Bruce In Philly
That what my first reaction also.... so what is it about the Ferrari engine design that does that?
Cam timing, head flow and very short intake runners. F355 is individual throttle body and 5 valve/cyl. That's also why it's -soft- at low/mid rpm, everything was tuned for high rpm. Not such a problem as it has short gearing.

The next generation 360 modena used a similar 5 valve engine but they bolstered the low/mid range torque with variable cam timing and dual inlet paths (long and short runners).
Old 05-15-2019, 11:15 AM
  #5  
ekam
Drifting
 
ekam's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Toronto
Posts: 2,034
Received 486 Likes on 314 Posts
Default

This:

Name:  1W34K80.jpg
Views: 113
Size:  450.3 KB
Old 05-15-2019, 11:19 AM
  #6  
ekam
Drifting
 
ekam's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Toronto
Posts: 2,034
Received 486 Likes on 314 Posts
Default

It's also why F355 with an exhaust sounds like a F1 engine...
Old 05-15-2019, 12:44 PM
  #7  
Sporty
Rennlist Member
 
Sporty's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: North/Central, NJ
Posts: 1,380
Received 441 Likes on 283 Posts
Default

Thanks for sharing- good info. So are we seeing that for the 997.2 3.6 there is less than (only) a 9% loss from flywheel to rear wheels? That is , 345 HP to 315 HP - that's good, always thought it was more like 15-20% loss. Don't know the torque number difference offhand though.
Old 05-15-2019, 01:01 PM
  #8  
driggity
Advanced
 
driggity's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2019
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 88
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Sporty
Thanks for sharing- good info. So are we seeing that for the 997.2 3.6 there is less than (only) a 9% loss from flywheel to rear wheels? That is , 345 HP to 315 HP - that's good, always thought it was more like 15-20% loss. Don't know the torque number difference offhand though.
That loss is pretty consistent across all three cars. The M3 is 333 at the crank and the F355 is 375.
Old 05-15-2019, 03:00 PM
  #9  
quickxotica
Rennlist Member
 
quickxotica's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: San Francisco & parts north
Posts: 1,006
Received 177 Likes on 80 Posts
Default

I'm impressed by the torque of the 997, on a relative basis. Very useful in a street car, and they did it without (apparently) sacrificing too much at the top end. It's all about the area under the curve, after all. The DFI 3.8L would probably be even more dominant in this regard. Now, if we could only have the short gearing from the 355, then you'd really have something. :-)

Thanks for sharing!



Quick Reply: 997.2 3.6 dyno. vs E46 and F355



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 07:02 AM.