Notices
996 Turbo Forum 1999-2005
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

2005 Turbo S with only 193 miles

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-29-2017, 10:51 PM
  #16  
TT Surgeon
Race Director
 
TT Surgeon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: KC ex pat marooned in NY
Posts: 13,005
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

Nice car!
Old 03-30-2017, 10:42 PM
  #17  
Lance 4c
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Lance 4c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Central, WA
Posts: 389
Received 14 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

Some of the comments crack me up. For $273k, who cares if the tires have dry rot. Driven 163 miles, the oil and fluids should be fine. Anyone wanting and willing to spend that much quan on a museum piece are not likely wanting to rack up miles on it, which would bring the value down to normal value.
Old 03-30-2017, 10:56 PM
  #18  
mffarrell
Drifting
 
mffarrell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Vancouver WA (Southwestern) WA)
Posts: 2,087
Received 237 Likes on 171 Posts
Exclamation

Originally Posted by Lance 4c
Some of the comments crack me up. For $273k, who cares if the tires have dry rot. Driven 163 miles, the oil and fluids should be fine. Anyone wanting and willing to spend that much quan on a museum piece are not likely wanting to rack up miles on it, which would bring the value down to normal value.
Smoking some good dope?
Old 03-31-2017, 02:40 AM
  #19  
Jones R
Advanced
 
Jones R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 1 Post
Default

what's up with that ride height? Isn't the turbo S supposed to have x73? looks higher than it should
Old 03-31-2017, 02:49 AM
  #20  
Dock
RL Community Team
Rennlist Member
 
Dock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Atlanta, Georgia
Posts: 12,131
Received 766 Likes on 543 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Jones R
what's up with that ride height? Isn't the turbo S supposed to have x73? looks higher than it should
No.
Old 03-31-2017, 12:49 PM
  #21  
manimal
Rennlist Member
 
manimal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: San Diego
Posts: 1,487
Received 106 Likes on 85 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Lance 4c
Some of the comments crack me up. For $273k, who cares if the tires have dry rot. Driven 163 miles, the oil and fluids should be fine. Anyone wanting and willing to spend that much quan on a museum piece are not likely wanting to rack up miles on it, which would bring the value down to normal value.
I don't understand these comments from an old RL member. Have you read the owner's manual?
Old 03-31-2017, 04:24 PM
  #22  
Berra
Pro
 
Berra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Europe
Posts: 655
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by manimal
I don't understand these comments from an old RL member. Have you read the owner's manual?
I tend to agree to a certain level but remember that the service is different depending on what year the car is. Early cars have the annual service and 2004 and > don't require it. As far as I know, we all drive the same car no matter the year. Just because Porsche says one thing doesn't mean it's 100% correct.

I agree though that the same oil isn't good but how bad can it be when the car hasn't been touched? If I were a buyer, I'd change oil as in moto cross bikes...change oil, run it, change again and run it.
Old 03-31-2017, 04:50 PM
  #23  
Dock
RL Community Team
Rennlist Member
 
Dock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Atlanta, Georgia
Posts: 12,131
Received 766 Likes on 543 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Berra
Early cars have the annual service and 2004 and > don't require it.
For the MY'02 996 Turbo, on vehicles which accumulate low annual mileage between required service intervals (less than 9,000 miles/15,000 km yearly), a yearly maintenance must be performed. The yearly maintenance schedule does not require any fluids be changed. A scheduled maintence with oil/filter change must be performed after 2 years at the latest, unless the mileage for a scheduled major maintenance is reached earlier.
Old 03-31-2017, 10:23 PM
  #24  
Kevinmacd
Rennlist Member
 
Kevinmacd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: SE Florida
Posts: 2,740
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by autobonrun
The issue is the 193 miles. I'm sure the ask price for a 996 GT2 with 193 miles would be higher. Mileage always carries a lot of weight, rightly or wrongly.

Hard to tell from the photos; is slate gray a little darker than seal gray? It looks the same.
Havent seen any 996 gt2 with low mileage in the mid $200s
Old 03-31-2017, 10:39 PM
  #25  
Kevinmacd
Rennlist Member
 
Kevinmacd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: SE Florida
Posts: 2,740
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Lance 4c
Some of the comments crack me up. For $273k, who cares if the tires have dry rot. Driven 163 miles, the oil and fluids should be fine. Anyone wanting and willing to spend that much quan on a museum piece are not likely wanting to rack up miles on it, which would bring the value down to normal value.
Its not a museum piece its an X50 with S badging which did not exist! If you follow the Porsche maintenance procedures there is yearly and there is yearly or mileage checklist! I can guarantee most museums will service a sitting car!
Your assuming it will not be driven, bad assumption!
Old 04-01-2017, 12:24 AM
  #26  
Lance 4c
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Lance 4c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Central, WA
Posts: 389
Received 14 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

I think I didn't make my point well. Yes I am well aware that a car with no use will deteriorate; seals will dry, tires will be past their service life, etc. But...this car has virtually no miles on it. Ideally a car should be driven at minimum (I would guess) around 100 miles every 3 months or so to keep seals and bearing lubed, etc. Yes, the oil should be changed as condensation happens, etc., even with intermittent use. This car had NO use.

My point was, if the car had been driven for a few miles every 3 months, over a 12 year period it would have racked up 4k or more miles on the clock. And a car with 4k miles on it would be very low miles, but not even close to the 123 miles on this example. No one would price it in the stratosphere of this one. So, anyone wanting to buy a virtually un-driven car, would rather that it still had original tires. Why spend that much on a car, to put on miles and immediately bring it down to a normal car value. The person looking for this car would likely not drive it. As for changing the oil, with no heat cycles I doubt that an oil change would make any difference. FYI, I change mine every 3-4k miles, etc. as recommended. I bought my 2002 in 2011, and it only had 5.6k miles on it. I believe the po had only changed the oil 3x in the period before I bought it. I previously had a 993t that I bought with 4k miles on it, similar with my 996 I get it. Most of us buy and care for our cars to be driven.

Last edited by Lance 4c; 04-01-2017 at 12:39 AM.
Old 04-01-2017, 08:10 AM
  #27  
Berra
Pro
 
Berra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Europe
Posts: 655
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Dock
The yearly maintenance schedule does not require any fluids be changed.
That I didn't know, expected it to be a normal service of oil change etc.
Old 04-01-2017, 12:49 PM
  #28  
FRUNKenstein
Rennlist Member
 
FRUNKenstein's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Overland Park, KS
Posts: 6,013
Received 297 Likes on 171 Posts
Default

Heard through the grapevine today that a Middle Eastern gentleman has put down a deposit on it pending passage of a PPI. Then he's taking it back to Dubai to turn it into a track car. Needs a 996 generation car for the class he will be competing in and he wanted the best he could find, price obviously no object. Basically, he's buying the last brand new 996 on the planet, and he really doesn't care if it costs $70k or $270k. He's got over $100k in mods already planned/ordered for it.

Last edited by FRUNKenstein; 04-01-2017 at 01:50 PM.
Old 04-01-2017, 01:36 PM
  #29  
gophaster
Pro
 
gophaster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: South FLA
Posts: 716
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Kc, are you serious about this or is it April fools?

Don't mean it in a bad way at all, just curious

Originally Posted by kcattorney
Heard through the grapevine today that a Middle Eastern gentleman has put down a deposit on it pending passage of a PPI. Then he's taking it back to Dubai to turn it into a track car. Needs a 996 generation car for the class he will be competing in and he wanted the best he could find, price obviously no object. Basically, he's buying the last brand new 996 on the planet, and he really doesn't car if it costs $70k or $270k. He's got over $100k in mods already planned/ordered for it.
Old 04-01-2017, 04:07 PM
  #30  
clsund1
Instructor
 
clsund1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 215
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

I was going to say, someone is smoking something, but then read the last post by KC. If that's true, then some people have more money than sense.


Quick Reply: 2005 Turbo S with only 193 miles



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 01:09 AM.