Notices
996 Turbo Forum 1999-2005
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

IS this a stupid question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-06-2010, 06:38 PM
  #1  
Kerrage
Instructor
Thread Starter
 
Kerrage's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Calgary, Canada
Posts: 122
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default IS this a stupid question

I have never over revved my engine I always pay close attention on the occasion that I would rev my car close to redline....However with all the talk of over revs etc.....

Does Porsche not have a Rev limiter??? I have not pushed mine far enough to find out....but that would seem to make sense most high performance engines do...SO why not Porsche???

Just a thought
Old 12-06-2010, 06:45 PM
  #2  
coinboy
Racer
 
coinboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: DFW Texas
Posts: 268
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

They do have a Rev limiter. The over revving is only when you down shift to a lower gear at too high of a speed for the gear you shifted in to.
Old 12-06-2010, 06:45 PM
  #3  
aj986s
Rennlist Member
 
aj986s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Damascus, MD
Posts: 1,385
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

My 944's and our Boxster all have rev limiters (fortunately, not visited often ). So I would be very surprised to discover that the 996 Turbo does not.

ADDED: As others have mentioned in this thread, the electronic rev limiter only kicks in during acceleration as redline is reached. A downshift results in RPM increases based upon rear wheel speed and gear chosen. A money shift, where selected downshift gear causes the engine to rev past its redline, is not protected by the rev limiter.

Last edited by aj986s; 12-07-2010 at 08:29 AM.
Old 12-06-2010, 08:30 PM
  #4  
Fastboy
Rennlist Member
 
Fastboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Central Ontario
Posts: 297
Received 16 Likes on 12 Posts
Default

I think I hit my rev. limiter in the fall when I was WOT in 2nd gear coming out of a corner at the track --the car kind of "bucked" a bit--it may have been the rev limiter or it may have been the PSM kicking in. Not sure what the rev limiter would feel like when hit, so perhaps I'm mistaken. I wasnt looking at the tach at the time--busy concentrating on the track. 3rd gear was fine from there so it wasnt an engine issue.
Old 12-06-2010, 10:32 PM
  #5  
Last930
Burning Brakes
 
Last930's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Il.
Posts: 1,052
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Hitting the rev limiter while accelerating doesn't hurt anything ; it's there to stop damage from occuring under acceleration. However, if you overrev because of selecting the wrong gear while downshifting (2nd instaed of 4th for example) then you're out of luck. It's called the "money shift".
Old 12-07-2010, 01:35 AM
  #6  
adam_
Burning Brakes
 
adam_'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: N. California
Posts: 905
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

No car has a rev limiter that can prevent over-reving with a manual tranny... this is not a "porsche issue".

The DME cuts ignition if the speed exceeds the rev limit- HOWEVER, if you've shifted into 2nd gear at 120mph, no amount of computer code will slow your crankshaft down.
Old 12-07-2010, 07:36 AM
  #7  
rdstemler
Burning Brakes
 
rdstemler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Cape Cod
Posts: 856
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

There is one of the advantages of the Tip and PDK. No money shift!!! Balance that against the control of a manual and you have the basis for an argument over which is the better tranny to have!
Old 12-07-2010, 08:21 AM
  #8  
deckman
Burning Brakes
 
deckman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: MD
Posts: 881
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Sort of related question: Why does the Turbo redline at 6600 and the NA 911 redline at 7000?
Old 12-07-2010, 09:25 AM
  #9  
No HTwo O
Banned
 
No HTwo O's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Arlington Heights, IL
Posts: 7,299
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

It seems like everyone always forgets that you can also over-rev the engine from a spin situation, in which you don't get the clutch in fast enough, and spin the engine in the opposite direction, and cause an over-rev. The rev-limiter does not protect you in this situation.
Old 12-07-2010, 11:02 AM
  #10  
LVDell
Nordschleife Master
 
LVDell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Tobacco Road, NC
Posts: 5,225
Likes: 0
Received 28 Likes on 23 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by deckman
Sort of related question: Why does the Turbo redline at 6600 and the NA 911 redline at 7000?
From what I understand compression and engine internals. But I'll defer to the experts.
Old 12-07-2010, 03:02 PM
  #11  
Macster
Race Director
 
Macster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Centerton, AR
Posts: 19,034
Likes: 0
Received 252 Likes on 222 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by deckman
Sort of related question: Why does the Turbo redline at 6600 and the NA 911 redline at 7000?
Many factors contribute to an engine's redline.

But generally, valve control is the biggie. While the rest of the engine may be capable of sustaining higher rpms, if the valves start to float... that's it. So the engine's redline is set to be safely below the point at which the valves begin to float. And there has to be considerable margin to account for any differences in valve spring strengths, differences in valve gear weights, and whatever effects time and heat and cycles of heat have on these items.

(A few years ago read about a European car mag writer/driver testing a (then new) Carrera GT and missing a shift with the result the CGT engine failed. A postmortum of the engine's failure found the revs touched 14K.)

Obviously too the Turbo engine is supercharged and because of this perhaps the engine designers felt additional revs not worth the extra stress the engine would be subject to. The NA engine needs more revs to produce more HP.

I believe too the racing engine platform the Turbo engine is based upon uses much higher strength rods/fasteners than the street Turbo engine fitted with. This is a cost issue, of course. Titanium rods/rod bolts or studs or whatever cost big bucks. Their absence could contribute to the lower redline of the Turbo engine to provide adequate safety margin. Again there are differences between the rods, rod fasteners, and the weight of the 6 rod/piston assemblies. The worst case has to be budgeted for.

Sincerely,

Macster.
Old 12-07-2010, 10:56 PM
  #12  
1AS
Rennlist Member
 
1AS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: dune acres, Indiana
Posts: 4,084
Received 52 Likes on 27 Posts
Default

I think there is a typo in that answer. AS
Old 12-08-2010, 04:38 AM
  #13  
Kevin
Addict
Rennlist Member


Rennlist
Site Sponsor

 
Kevin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Northwest
Posts: 9,319
Received 311 Likes on 217 Posts
Default

The stock Redline for 996TT is 6750..

The rods and crank that is used in the above mentioned cars are also in the NA 993, and 993TT. Same pieces... No harm is done to increase the RPM limit to 7000 RPM's..
Old 12-08-2010, 12:43 PM
  #14  
slant911
Burning Brakes
 
slant911's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Las Vegas, NV.
Posts: 1,243
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Default

Quick question Kevin...........If you do increase the limiter to 7K would the DME record over revs from the stock rev limit settings?
Old 12-09-2010, 12:08 AM
  #15  
Danyol
Racer
 
Danyol's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: AZ
Posts: 282
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

I've had people tell me and read that they've seen type II overrevs after bouncing off the redline. Some have sworn to have never made a "money shift". Could this be caused by engine momentum in 1st gear?


Quick Reply: IS this a stupid question



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 10:13 PM.