Since there has been alot of talk lately about sub 700HP turbo solutions, I thought this would make an interesting comparison. Both vehicles were run AWD at the same facility , the same Mustang dyno and the same dyno operator. The two setups are Kevin's 16/24 ZC with his in house ECU programming(my car) and an EVO stg4. I think these numbers show a well engineered hybrid has no downside at these power levels when compared to a 24. Both cars have similar peak HP, but peak tq and tq under the curve are quite different. Technology is marching along and 700hp+ is possible with no downsides as well. Kevin showed me aprelim dyno sheet of his STG3 setup that will be in production soon. It has more tq than these stg2's at all points on the rpm band and it comes in slightly earlier as well.Peaks at well over 700hp+.... If anyone wants the source data let me know. Kevin

 

Here is a compariosn graph....

 

Kevin keep it coming. I love your posts +1.

 

Good power under the curve.

 

One should never forget the power of the search tool. This thread is > 18 months old. I forgot how good these UMW Stage 2 ZC Hybrid's are. Kevin (UMW) have you changed anything within this package or is it fundamentally the same.

 

Question also on what else was installed from either a fuel or MAF standpoint. Was it just the turbos or what else was in this "package"?

Also, I assume on those graphs that is HP to the wheels not flywheel, correct?

 

A 5 bar FPR is required, along with the billet wastegates. KPG's system was/is a full blown Z/C kit..