Notices
996 Turbo Forum 1999-2005
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Fuel system upgrade for higher output motors

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-02-2018, 04:08 AM
  #16  
powdrhound
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
powdrhound's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 6,831
Received 1,723 Likes on 1,003 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by LQQK
John - fell is more about the gt2 tank install. How hard was it??
To swap a GT2 tank into a TT is not a particularly difficult exercise but it is time consuming and it requires that all the coolant lines from the very front of the car all the way to the very rear of the car be changed out, both the hard lines and the rubber hoses. You would also need to swap out all the fuel and vent lines that connect to the tank. There are also a bunch of brackets and clips that need to be changed out. Besides the tank you would also need to change out the tank lid /in-tank float sending unit, and the fuel pump/basket. The final and most expensive piece of the puzzle is the requirement to run a GT2 instrument cluster otherwise you would not be able to get a functioning fuel gauge. All in all, it's probably $10-11K worth of parts and a few days worth of labor as the complete front suspension including subframe has to be removed from the car.

I do not know if the stock TT ABS unit is compatible with a GT2 cluster so that may or may not require some amount of wiring to work properly. You might need to go to a GT2 ABS but not 100% sure on that. PSM certainly would not work with a GT2 cluster as the PSM logic is contained in the cluster itself. If you have PSM disconnected on your car, the benefit of the GT2 cluster is that you would not get any PSM warnings. Hope this helps.
Old 11-02-2018, 05:27 AM
  #17  
ghostofpain
Instructor
 
ghostofpain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 183
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Hey John,
i know that question is terrible, but to sell your car with OEM pieces and by a gt2 would that not have been better/cheaper?
Old 11-02-2018, 05:56 AM
  #18  
powdrhound
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
powdrhound's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 6,831
Received 1,723 Likes on 1,003 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ghostofpain
Hey John,
i know that question is terrible, but to sell your car with OEM pieces and by a gt2 would that not have been better/cheaper?
No, because I would have ended up stripping pretty much everything off the GT2 to upgrade it anyway for heavy track use, including suspension top to bottom down to the last nut and bolt, wheel carriers, subframes, all control arms, the complete brake system including ABS, brake calipers, rotors, wheels, seats, hood, decklid, exhaust, LSD, etc. etc. My car was originally built by RUF and I removed and sold all the RUF parts at a premium (it’s crazy how much people were willing to pay for that stuff) which offset the cost to a large degree.

Last edited by powdrhound; 11-02-2018 at 09:11 AM.
Old 11-02-2018, 01:19 PM
  #19  
s65e90
Drifting
 
s65e90's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 3,248
Received 725 Likes on 503 Posts
Default

All that effort for a gt2 tank, why not just run a cell? Your car looks far from streetable anyway and looks exclusively used on a track, no?
Old 11-02-2018, 02:22 PM
  #20  
powdrhound
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
powdrhound's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 6,831
Received 1,723 Likes on 1,003 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by s65e90
All that effort for a gt2 tank, why not just run a cell? Your car looks far from streetable anyway and looks exclusively used on a track, no?
Yes the car is 99% track but I still register it and could use it as a street toy if I wanted to so I wanted to retain an emission legal fuel system. I just wanted a plug and play deal and my car already had the GT2 cluster so it was relatively easy when it was time to change all of the hoses as I would have had to buy those regardless. I only paid a couple of hundred for the GT2 tank itself and sold the TT tank. Labor was not a big deal with the car on a lift. All in all it was fairly easy to do while the car was down for maintenance and suspension work.

There is a quantifiable benefit for me with the flat bottom tank, the capacity is slightly greater, the center of gravity is significantly lower and about a foot further aft, the fuel pump sits at the very bottom of the tank thus not simply relying on the two venturi lift pumps, and the pump output is slightly greater due to a single venturi pump used instead of two.
Old 04-05-2023, 01:25 PM
  #21  
LinwoodM
Rennlist Member
 
LinwoodM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 518
Received 216 Likes on 129 Posts
Default

Are you still on a -6 line or have you moved to a -8?
Old 04-05-2023, 10:23 PM
  #22  
powdrhound
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
powdrhound's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 6,831
Received 1,723 Likes on 1,003 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by LinwoodM
Are you still on a -6 line or have you moved to a -8?
I use a single -8AN supply that splits into a -8 Y at the engine feeding each fuel rail individually. There is no return line.

Last edited by powdrhound; 04-05-2023 at 10:26 PM.
Old 04-06-2023, 09:18 AM
  #23  
LinwoodM
Rennlist Member
 
LinwoodM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 518
Received 216 Likes on 129 Posts
Default

As this thread is almost 5 years old, would you say that a -6 feed and return line is enough for 700ish whp using the 450 pump on stock ECU for a tuning source? Or do you think it is worth it to just do the -8 feed and -6 return since the work is being done and the cost is relative?
Old 04-06-2023, 11:54 AM
  #24  
powdrhound
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
powdrhound's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 6,831
Received 1,723 Likes on 1,003 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by LinwoodM
As this thread is almost 5 years old, would you say that a -6 feed and return line is enough for 700ish whp using the 450 pump on stock ECU for a tuning source? Or do you think it is worth it to just do the -8 feed and -6 return since the work is being done and the cost is relative?
I would do the -8 feed for sure (the -6 is limited to 700whp or so). Do a -6 return if you are not controlling pump output, if it's fixed at 100%. The Walbro 450 is a PWM pump so you can use a controller. If you use a controller, you can keep the stock OEM return line. With a controller, I would use the Walbro 525 or 535 pump which as an output about 20% more than the 450.

I no longer use the fuel system set up depicted in this thread but it still works great for most applications.
The following users liked this post:
LinwoodM (04-06-2023)
Old 04-06-2023, 03:24 PM
  #25  
2fcknfst
RL Community Team
Rennlist Member
 
2fcknfst's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 17,666
Likes: 0
Received 3,854 Likes on 2,936 Posts
Default

Great, now I'm thinking about fuel lines...

I have the Radium pump installed with the Walboro, will the lines be needed?
The following users liked this post:
LinwoodM (04-06-2023)
Old 04-06-2023, 05:28 PM
  #26  
LinwoodM
Rennlist Member
 
LinwoodM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 518
Received 216 Likes on 129 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 2fcknfst
Great, now I'm thinking about fuel lines...

I have the Radium pump installed with the Walboro, will the lines be needed?

See why I made that thread? So many people are in the dark as to all what is needed to do aftermarket turbos CORRECTLY.
Old 04-06-2023, 05:51 PM
  #27  
2fcknfst
RL Community Team
Rennlist Member
 
2fcknfst's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 17,666
Likes: 0
Received 3,854 Likes on 2,936 Posts
Default

Yessir - I figured once I found out about the 90mm exhaust flanges, there would be more to it than meets the eye...

So far, I have gotten new injectors, new intake, new exhaust new FPR, new turbo bolt adapter thingy (coming at some point), have to machine a screw down, must make sure I do not incinerate a water line, considering a new fuel line, bunch of new hardware, new oil reservoirs (maybe... John said I could just connect the return line and remove the reservoir), thinking of new coolant pipes so I can mount the the taps horizontally instead of vertically....

Thank sweet baby Jesus that John had already clocked the turbos and set the wastegates because when I saw @paopao doing this set up with the engine out, I thought, yeah, thank sweet baby Jesus...

So yeah, deep appreciation for you starting that thread.
The following users liked this post:
LinwoodM (04-06-2023)
Old 04-07-2023, 01:54 PM
  #28  
powdrhound
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
powdrhound's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 6,831
Received 1,723 Likes on 1,003 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 2fcknfst
Great, now I'm thinking about fuel lines...

I have the Radium pump installed with the Walboro, will the lines be needed?
You should be fine. One of my track friends runs the XR1000s on his stock block 3.6 and he's at 645wph/535wtq using stock lines and the Walbro 450 pump. He has the IDC1300 injectors. Runs pump gas at 1.3 bar if I recall. Everything is working fine but I would imagine he's near the limit of the stock fuel lines. Anything approaching 700 I would do a -8 supply. Beyond low to mid 700whp, a -8 supply, -6 return and a Walbro 525 is advisable.

Last edited by powdrhound; 04-07-2023 at 01:56 PM.
Old 04-10-2023, 09:52 PM
  #29  
2fcknfst
RL Community Team
Rennlist Member
 
2fcknfst's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 17,666
Likes: 0
Received 3,854 Likes on 2,936 Posts
Default

Thank you, peace in my mind.
Old 02-07-2024, 01:26 PM
  #30  
Capt. Obvious
Rennlist Member
 
Capt. Obvious's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Gig Harbor, WA
Posts: 3,877
Received 1,427 Likes on 783 Posts
Default

Bringing this topic again as I'd like to start collecting parts to redo my fuel lines. Does anyone have a list of suggested fittings I should get to run -6 or -8 lines in my car (and suggestions on good suppliers)? Also, any "while you're in there" suggestions when installing the new fuel pump?


Quick Reply: Fuel system upgrade for higher output motors



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 10:07 PM.