Notices
996 GT2/GT3 Forum 1999-2005
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Tow Vehicle BMW X5 3.0 or Cayenne

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-20-2009, 10:03 PM
  #16  
ricster
Banned
 
ricster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 977
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

sent you a pm
Old 08-20-2009, 10:10 PM
  #17  
LVDell
Nordschleife Master
 
LVDell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Tobacco Road, NC
Posts: 5,225
Likes: 0
Received 28 Likes on 23 Posts
Default

Mike......

Not sure where you read anywhere the Escalade is LESS than the Pepper at least with the new ones (which I have). The tow rating is well over 8K and with the weight distributing hitch it's well over 10K and a tongue weight well over 1K#. It's also nice to have the roar of that push rod V8 sing all 417ft-lb of torque when accelerating uphill

The other thing is the tongue weight......IIRC, the tongue weight on the Pepper was very low compared to it's tongue weight (something like 650#) which didn't even meet the 10-15% of the weight requirement if you towed near the limit.

Here's my setup
Attached Images   
Old 08-20-2009, 10:12 PM
  #18  
roberga
Nordschleife Master
 
roberga's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: SEATTLE
Posts: 5,165
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by rodneyr
All good comments and the results are pretty much as I expected. I would probably need to step up to a V8 X5 xDrive48i or Cayenne S, and better choice would be some of the cars mentioned for this application. No wonder I don't see many X5's or Cayenne's towing cars for DE's. The other minor issue is if I get one of these V8's then I am stuck with poor gas milage for a daily driver car.

I probably do around 15 events a year, and I figured 6 days would be away to WGI (280 miles). With a trailer I could try VIR and LCMT. No fun driving up/home on MPSC tires in the rain.
MB GL 320 CDI 18 city 26 mpg freeway @ 70 miles per hour. 3 rows that hold fully grown humans in the back Fuel is 10 a gallon less than regular. I go to Portland no back on less than a 1/2 tank.
Old 08-20-2009, 10:25 PM
  #19  
Mike Buck
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Mike Buck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: North East, MD
Posts: 2,131
Received 22 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

Specs for the Caddy's. It's on the Cadillac website.

Escalade 2WD 6.2L V8 8300
Escalade AWD 6.2L V8 8100
Escalade ESV 2WD 6.2L V8 7600
Escalade ESV AWD 6.2L V8 7800
Escalade EXT AWD 6.2L V8 7500
Old 08-20-2009, 10:35 PM
  #20  
LVDell
Nordschleife Master
 
LVDell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Tobacco Road, NC
Posts: 5,225
Likes: 0
Received 28 Likes on 23 Posts
Default

Thanks for pointing out what I know and have said. Not sure where you are going with this. The tow rating is based on the chassis. The Escalade tows more, has a tongue weight that can be properly used and has a more powerful motor. The Cayenne's strongsuit is it's chassis but that's all.
Old 08-20-2009, 11:25 PM
  #21  
Mike Buck
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Mike Buck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: North East, MD
Posts: 2,131
Received 22 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

Dell
I'm not going anywhere lol. I'm glad you like your setup. I did get a chuckle when you said you liked the longer wheelbase on your Caddy better though. It is a whole 3.6 inches longer!!


To the OP:
Tow vehicle discussions are always such a disaster, I try not to get sucked in. Use what you want. As long as folks aren't overloading their rig, I don't really care. The specs are out there for whatever you are considering. Read up and make an informed decision. The further you are from the load limit, the better. Short wheelbase rigs bother me less than the folks who brag about towing at 85mph
Old 08-21-2009, 12:32 AM
  #22  
996FLT6
Rennlist Member
 
996FLT6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: san francisco
Posts: 14,313
Received 247 Likes on 203 Posts
Default

The Caddy looks great with bling bling rims : ). Sorry Dell had to say it. Watching too much MTV with my 14 year old daughter : ). Mike
Old 08-21-2009, 12:58 AM
  #23  
One of Twenty
Banned
 
One of Twenty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 9,422
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

All other tow vehicles thus far listed are merely amateurs/poseurs.

No substitute for a V10 diesel with two turbos.

It pulls jumbo jets. This is a bone stock Touareg with 9000lbs of sand(ballast) in the vehicle. The only mod is tire pressure.

Old 08-21-2009, 08:04 AM
  #24  
LVDell
Nordschleife Master
 
LVDell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Tobacco Road, NC
Posts: 5,225
Likes: 0
Received 28 Likes on 23 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 996FLT6
The Caddy looks great with bling bling rims : ). Sorry Dell had to say it. Watching too much MTV with my 14 year old daughter : ). Mike
I call it my pimp daddy baby mobile. But then again, that's how I roll! I've been watching too many ESPN promos with athletes and there 'lades


Originally Posted by Mike Buck
Dell
I'm not going anywhere lol. I'm glad you like your setup. I did get a chuckle when you said you liked the longer wheelbase on your Caddy better though. It is a whole 3.6 inches longer!!


To the OP:
Tow vehicle discussions are always such a disaster, I try not to get sucked in. Use what you want. As long as folks aren't overloading their rig, I don't really care. The specs are out there for whatever you are considering. Read up and make an informed decision. The further you are from the load limit, the better. Short wheelbase rigs bother me less than the folks who brag about towing at 85mph
Weight of the 'lade more? Check
Towing capacity higher? Check
Tongue weight able to use the towing capacity? Check
Longer wheel base (and yes, 3.6" is longer)?Check
Condescending know-it-all in the thread?Check

There's one of you in every towing thread. And he usually has some uber-truck tow vehicle that thinks he knows best. Time for you to go.
Old 08-21-2009, 11:26 AM
  #25  
Mike Buck
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Mike Buck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: North East, MD
Posts: 2,131
Received 22 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by rodneyr

Quite frankly I have not seen too many X5's or Cayenne's towing cars at DE's. I mainly see more of the F150 or larger vehicles.
I missed this before. In my area at least, DC Metro, lots of folks tow with Cayenne's and open trailers, lots of people. S is the popular platform, but some have turbos. You see the larger stuff like pickups when using enclosed trailers. I know one guy with an X5. I think he is just trying to be different though.



You crack me up Dell
Old 08-21-2009, 11:32 AM
  #26  
LVDell
Nordschleife Master
 
LVDell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Tobacco Road, NC
Posts: 5,225
Likes: 0
Received 28 Likes on 23 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Mike Buck
You crack me up Dell
Glad to help.
Old 08-21-2009, 02:18 PM
  #27  
robertsmau
Advanced
 
robertsmau's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I've got a 2005 X5 4.4i V8 and it tows my BMW 328i on a steel trailer with no problem. It also happens to be my wife's daily driver and she loves it. Unfortunately, we will be selling it when our third child is born in a few weeks and the need for a 3rd row will overpower the love of the BMW. It already has the class III hitchso if you're interested shoot me an email.
Old 08-21-2009, 08:57 PM
  #28  
rodneyr
Three Wheelin'
Thread Starter
 
rodneyr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Darien, CT
Posts: 1,264
Received 159 Likes on 110 Posts
Default

Finally a BMW owner with an application of towing that uses the car as a daily driver. I am convinced a Cayenne will be a better tow vehicle, but I really want the answer to be BMW. Yes, I know that is a little silly, but my wife would be more confortable driving an X5 vs a Cayenne.

In looking at the prices of a Cayenne S vs. X5 xDrive48i the BMW is around $4K less. The Cayenne has a bigger motor(385hp vs. 350hp), but gets the same gas mileage.

Looking at the new X5 xDrive35d (diesel) is even a better value, but only has a 3.0 6 cyl turbocharged engine with a ton of torque (425). The big benefit for this car is the gas milage of 26 mpg vs. 19mpg for the other two cars. I am guessing with the 6 cyl diesel I will run into issues already discussed.

Also, I really like the $0 maintenance cost for the BMW vs. $$$ for the p-car. When I walk into my BMW dealer they say are your "wipers a little squeaky" and offer free replacements. Also, I get my choice of a new 3 series or X3. When I go into service my Porsche I pay $$$$ and get a Camary loan-a-car.

Thanks for all the good comments and feedback.

So the story continues...
Old 08-21-2009, 09:00 PM
  #29  
LVDell
Nordschleife Master
 
LVDell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Tobacco Road, NC
Posts: 5,225
Likes: 0
Received 28 Likes on 23 Posts
Default

I agree 100%. The idea of $0 maintenance costs and the torque of the diesel is very appealing as a tow vehicle.
Old 08-21-2009, 11:17 PM
  #30  
Dave S
Rennlist Member
 
Dave S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: New York, USA
Posts: 257
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Not sure of answer on this but check the suspension for the air springs on the X5. If memory serves me correctly the V8 has the self leveling option and the 6 cyl does not. I tow with a Range Rover and have found the self leveling to be a critical improvement vs. the land cruiser I used years ago.


Quick Reply: Tow Vehicle BMW X5 3.0 or Cayenne



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 04:42 AM.