Notices
996 GT2/GT3 Forum 1999-2005
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:
View Poll Results: I want my GT2/GT3 engine in:
Front
2
1.29%
Back
51
32.90%
Middle
99
63.87%
I don't care
3
1.94%
Voters: 155. You may not vote on this poll

If mid engine were a possibility in GT2/GT3

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-30-2006, 04:00 PM
  #16  
Larry Herman
Rennlist
Basic Site Sponsor
 
Larry Herman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Columbus, NJ
Posts: 10,432
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

I want it in the rear (boy that just doesn't sound right ). Call me old fashioned, but I much prefer not to see what I am going to hit if I go flying off the track. With a mid-engined car it's 50/50 as to which way you go in.
__________________
Larry Herman
2016 Ford Transit Connect Titanium LWB
2018 Tesla Model 3 - Electricity can be fun!
Retired Club Racer & National PCA Instructor
Past Flames:
1994 RS America Club Racer
2004 GT3 Track Car
1984 911 Carrera Club Racer
1974 914/4 2.0 Track Car

CLICK HERE to see some of my ancient racing videos.

Old 10-30-2006, 04:27 PM
  #17  
icon
Three Wheelin'
 
icon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Longboat Key, FL
Posts: 1,698
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Larry Herman
I want it in the rear (boy that just doesn't sound right ). Call me old fashioned, but I much prefer not to see what I am going to hit if I go flying off the track. With a mid-engined car it's 50/50 as to which way you go in.
i thought missionary was the old fashion way
hey! i have no problem w/ you guys that like it in the rear though larry!

good thing they don't put the engine in the rear on that vfr!
i would think 50/50 would be better in a car for optimum handling, not to mention less wear on one end.
also if it's 50/50 it's less likely to go either way.

btw shouldnt we also have a front mid option in the poll?
assuming you mean rear mid by mid-engine.
Old 10-30-2006, 04:40 PM
  #18  
Holger B
Race Car
 
Holger B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: SF
Posts: 3,945
Received 87 Likes on 34 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Larry Herman
I want it in the rear (boy that just doesn't sound right ). Call me old fashioned, but I much prefer not to see what I am going to hit if I go flying off the track. With a mid-engined car it's 50/50 as to which way you go in.
Must be all that "Brotherly Love"... (Let fly with the SF jokes )
Old 10-30-2006, 05:52 PM
  #19  
MJSpeed
The Rebel
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
MJSpeed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: South Florida
Posts: 5,390
Received 40 Likes on 26 Posts
Default

Mid engine cars are just awesome when it comes to balance...most if not all purpose built racing P-cars have been mid-engine for that reason...
Old 10-30-2006, 06:04 PM
  #20  
Cupcar
Rennlist Member
 
Cupcar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: California Boardwalk, Skanderborg Denmark
Posts: 3,693
Received 100 Likes on 68 Posts
Default

I think the main reason is the low polar moment of inertia of a mid engine design which leads to quicker turn in and response.
Old 10-30-2006, 07:48 PM
  #21  
Larry Herman
Rennlist
Basic Site Sponsor
 
Larry Herman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Columbus, NJ
Posts: 10,432
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Having learned on a mid-engined car, I can tell you that they are not the handling panacea that many think they are. Below the limit they are nimble and responsive and really feel perfectly balanced. But they have a dark side, because at the limit they are wicked little beasts. That balance and low polar moment means that the slight understeer you feel can immediately switch to oversteer if the rear tires decide that they have had enough. Does the term "snap spin" mean anything to you?

911s by contrast do things much more slowly, and the rear-engine bias means that the car will always have a tendency to want to go to oversteer. That does not make them better, just more predictable.

Just like a street GT3 is easier to drive at the limit than a Cup Car is, I can tell you from experience that a rear engine (or front engine) car is easier at the limit than a mid-engined car is.
Old 10-30-2006, 08:15 PM
  #22  
perfectlap
Race Director
Thread Starter
 
perfectlap's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: NJ
Posts: 16,265
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

^that seems to be the prevailing belief as well. But obviously we are talking different levels of driving skill between a weekend warrior and a paid full time professional. Porsche teams feel the professional driver can handle the lesser warning with mid engine while still reaping the rewards of that config, more to gain than to lose if you will. A sentiment shared by Ferrari and others in racing.
For more everyday "regular guys" the rewards may not be as big while running the risk of going off.
More to lose than to gain.
At the limit my take is that its not really a question of the rear engine having better predictability than mid enigne becuase that rear configuration pretty much requires it. If the 911 had poor to average predictiablity AND pendulus cornering who would go for that?
Sort of like betting on making a mistake vs. not.
Old 10-30-2006, 08:56 PM
  #23  
Cupcar
Rennlist Member
 
Cupcar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: California Boardwalk, Skanderborg Denmark
Posts: 3,693
Received 100 Likes on 68 Posts
Default

The GT1 was a "911" but Norbert Singer made it mid-engined for it's purposes, he could have left it rear engined.

Was the GT1 really still a 911 or the first "Cayman"?

Porsche went to a lot of trouble to make it mid-engined, so their must be some benefits to racers as described above.
Old 10-30-2006, 09:39 PM
  #24  
Larry Herman
Rennlist
Basic Site Sponsor
 
Larry Herman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Columbus, NJ
Posts: 10,432
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Cupcar
Porsche went to a lot of trouble to make it mid-engined, so their must be some benefits to racers as described above.
There is no question that mid-engined is faster. The point is that at full boogie it isn't easier to drive, it's tougher.
Old 10-30-2006, 09:53 PM
  #25  
GT3 Chuck
Rennlist Member
 
GT3 Chuck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Fresno, Ca
Posts: 972
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

having had a 914-6.....I'm with Larry on this one...
Old 10-30-2006, 09:59 PM
  #26  
Larry Herman
Rennlist
Basic Site Sponsor
 
Larry Herman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Columbus, NJ
Posts: 10,432
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by GT3 Chuck
having had a 914-6.....I'm with Larry on this one...
You mean you're against me sometimes?
Old 10-30-2006, 10:16 PM
  #27  
GT3 Chuck
Rennlist Member
 
GT3 Chuck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Fresno, Ca
Posts: 972
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Larry Herman
You mean you're against me sometimes?
not yet bro!
Old 10-30-2006, 11:39 PM
  #28  
JBH
Addict
Rennlist Member
 
JBH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Putnam Valley, NY
Posts: 3,259
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I would say don't make a judgment against mid-engine based on the 914. It's short wheelbase does indeed make it a demon at the limits. Given a longer wheelbase, like the new 911s, your opinion might be quite different.
Old 10-31-2006, 12:06 AM
  #29  
Cupcar
Rennlist Member
 
Cupcar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: California Boardwalk, Skanderborg Denmark
Posts: 3,693
Received 100 Likes on 68 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by GT3 Chuck
having had a 914-6.....I'm with Larry on this one...
I found my 914/6 GT to be the best handling car I've owned, wish I still had it.

Old 10-31-2006, 12:09 AM
  #30  
38D
Nordschleife Master
 
38D's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: About to pass you...
Posts: 6,670
Received 833 Likes on 418 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by GT3 Chuck
having had a 914-6.....I'm with Larry on this one...
Me 2. My 914 was evil at the limit.

Now, having driven a Boxster S on the track, it was certainly easier to drive than the 914. But all mid engined cars are still tricky to pilot at full bore. The low polar moment means the car can turn on a dime, and sometimes spins on a dime as well. Pro teams use mid engine layouts because they are easier to setup and more consistent in all corner types. Plus, they have full time staff to help setup the car and get it just right.


Quick Reply: If mid engine were a possibility in GT2/GT3



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 12:26 PM.