Notices
996 GT2/GT3 Forum 1999-2005
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Anybody get their new Car and Driver?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-11-2005, 10:43 AM
  #46  
trumperZ06
Burning Brakes
 
trumperZ06's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 855
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

WOW !!! The C-6 Z06 is drawing interest across the WEB !

Lots of negative comments here on a car that NO ONE has driven or seen on a track ! This thread seems to be turning into a bashing contest of Porsche vs. Vette.

The Z06 wasn't designed as a "cruiser" and the orginial model didn't offer many Foo Foo options! But the C-5 Z06 did do one thing Remarkably well, it EARNED the respect of a knowledgable group of enthusiasts who track their cars

Those of us who TRACK our cars at places like Road Atlanta, VIR, etc., seem to have a greater appreciation for one another's sportscars, and we really enjoy running with other vechicles!

The Porsche 944 Turbo remains popular, and is still competitive, even being 20 years old. It's drive train lay-out is simular to the latest Vettes! IMO... The 944 probably is the most neutural handling stock car ever offered by Porsche!

Remarkable coincidence.... Hhmmmmmm.

For those of you who are doubting GM's engineering capability, come on out and see how the current Z06 does runnng with Porsches, Ferrari's etc.! Oh, and by the way... Our reliability has been OUTSTANDING !

Now imagine adding another 81 cubic inches, ~ 95 hp./~75 ft.lbs torque with better brakes and cooling! Awesome thought, huh HUH !
Old 01-11-2005, 01:44 PM
  #47  
Wachuko
Professor of Pending Projects
Rennlist Member
 
Wachuko's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 9,891
Received 23 Likes on 22 Posts
Cool

I never liked Corvettes until now (well... the 1957 was/is also a beauty imho). The C6 changed my mind and looking at the Z06 oh well .

But these cars do not replace each other... meaning that I love the looks and feel of the Porsche (911, 951, etc.) but also happen to like the new Vette a lot. I cannot see myself ever without a Porsche so for now the 951 and the 964 will do and I will try to keep them and just add a Corvette to the stable

BTW, here are some photos of the Z06:



Let me find a few more to post.
Old 01-11-2005, 01:49 PM
  #48  
Wachuko
Professor of Pending Projects
Rennlist Member
 
Wachuko's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 9,891
Received 23 Likes on 22 Posts
Cool

Here we go...








And one last one:



If I had enough money... this would share the garage with a GT3, F360, American Iron Horse Tejas, and an Aston Martin DB9
Old 01-11-2005, 03:35 PM
  #49  
Mikey
Racer
 
Mikey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 365
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by rwg
The 2004 z06 was $52k. The 2004 z06 Commemorative Edition was $57k. Your source appears to be way off.
Actually my source works for Chevy, and offered me the employee price (which I refused.) The MSRP is meaningless for a Z06, they were giving away the cars last year.

Originally Posted by rwg
It makes a huge difference whether the weight is in front or behind the rear axle. That's the whole point of the polar moment of inertia.
So if you think a few inches in front or behind the axle is huge, then you agree having the motor in the front can't be right.


Originally Posted by rwg
Why do you think Porsche used a mid-engine configuration for their best car?
Their best car is the GT3 not the Carrera GT. The Carrera GT is a supercar. it can't be really compared to anything other than may be the McLaren F1 and Enzo.

Originally Posted by rwg
Why do you think Porsche holds the Boxster back?
Just to tease Ferrari.

Originally Posted by rwg
That "$hity" configuration has done quite well around the race track. In its five years, the Corvette C5-R racing program took 35 victories in 55 races, four American Le Mans Series championships and three double victories at the 24 Hours of Le Mans. Any car that has 500hp will have the capability to lose traction on the street regardless of where the engine lies.
Track cars are optimized in every possible way, by shifting weight around, etc. The C5-R has almost nothing in common with the street car except the general shape and would never pass the safety requirements for a street car.

Originally Posted by rwg
Interesting that those dropouts in Detroit built the 2001 and 2002 z06 which won JD Power's "best premium sports car in inital quality" for both years. Mercedes won it in 2003.
People that buy expensive cars are more vocal. The Z06 guys are dead, so they can't complain.

Originally Posted by rwg
I don't even have a z06 but I respect all sports cars regardless of what badge they have on the hood. GM is very serious about making a world class sports car with the c6 z06 and it sounds like they have done a great job. The more competition there is in the sports car world the better it is for us as consumers. I hope the z06 lights a fire under Porsche's ***. My 03 Boxster S was considered a significant redesign with an 8hp bump, 2 cupholders, a glove box, and a glass rear windshield among other very minor things. Give me a break. While I consider Porsches to be amazing sports cars, Porsche risks alienating customers like me who value price and performance more than the badge on their hood.
I value my life more than cupholders. Go buy the new Z06 and report back when it falls apart in 12,000 miles and try not to kill yourself (or someone else) in the mean time.

Last edited by quartermile; 01-11-2005 at 08:05 PM.
Old 01-12-2005, 11:07 PM
  #50  
Cupcar
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
Cupcar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: California Boardwalk, Skanderborg Denmark
Posts: 3,693
Received 100 Likes on 68 Posts
Default

As I read the posts I am amazed at the amount of tribal behavior there is out there.

Some will categorically not drive Japanese or American cars since they do not have the "tribal image" one desires to associate with.

Too bad a product can't stand on it's virtues alone in today's world.
Old 01-13-2005, 12:05 AM
  #51  
macfly
Three Wheelin'
 
macfly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: LA, CA
Posts: 1,475
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

As I read the posts I am amazed at the amount of tribal behavior there is out there.

Some will categorically not drive Japanese or American cars since they do not have the "tribal image" one desires to associate with.

Too bad a product can't stand on it's virtues alone in today's world.


Yep, there are a lot of very blinkered and narrow minded folks out there when it comes to automotive capability. I think the Z06 will be an absolute hoot to drive, and I can't wait to have a go in one!
Old 01-13-2005, 12:14 AM
  #52  
msch
Instructor
 
msch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: CA
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Personally, I think the new Z06 is astounding. Enough to make me sell my porsche for one? Probably not, but I think it's a great car anyways. I agree that there is a lot of tribal behavior out there.

One thing is true though, I think porsche isn't heading in the right path at the moment. Although, i'm curious to see how that C7s fairs out...

Oh and maybe someone can enlighten me on this, I thought that corvette was copying the 951's engineering in the 80's - 90s? Could be wrong though...
Old 01-13-2005, 12:17 AM
  #53  
Cupcar
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
Cupcar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: California Boardwalk, Skanderborg Denmark
Posts: 3,693
Received 100 Likes on 68 Posts
Default

Pontiac had a rear mounted transmission on the Pontiac Le Mans of 1963, Ferrari has used transaxels since the 60's.

So the rear mounted gearbox is not new.
Old 01-13-2005, 12:33 AM
  #54  
MetalSolid
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
MetalSolid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 1,643
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I would never buy a regular Corvette, but I saw the C6 Z06 at the LA Autoshow, and on top of it's performance specs it also looks impressive. At the projected ~$68K price point I'd get this car over any current Porsche except the GT2, GT3, Carrera GT...

Porsche should just go ahead and use that Cayenne engine properly and shoehorn it into the Boxster Coupe RS.
Old 01-13-2005, 12:57 AM
  #55  
Cupcar
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
Cupcar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: California Boardwalk, Skanderborg Denmark
Posts: 3,693
Received 100 Likes on 68 Posts
Default

If Porsche were building cars following their old paradigm we would have an all aluminum bodied car with a magnesium engine and transmission, forged alloy wheels and a forged aluminum suspension....and a 911 that weighed around 2600 pounds.

Instead we get from the new Porsche an all steel body (well, an aluminum hood) with engine, suspension and wheels of cast aluminum weighing in at over 3100 pounds.
Old 01-13-2005, 01:57 AM
  #56  
GrantG
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
GrantG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Denver
Posts: 18,148
Received 5,083 Likes on 2,865 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by msch
Oh and maybe someone can enlighten me on this, I thought that corvette was copying the 951's engineering in the 80's - 90s? Could be wrong though...
The Ferrari Daytona 365GTB/4 had that layout (front engine rear transaxle) in 1967 and I don't think it was the first. Still, it is a pretty nice layout
Old 01-13-2005, 12:43 PM
  #57  
Mikey
Racer
 
Mikey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 365
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Before choosing the GT3 this was my short list in early 2004 (in order of preference):

1. Ford GT
2. Gallardo
3. F360 CS

So I walked into a Ford dealership in Mission Valley! As you approach the showroom there is this rotten smell in the air and the path is littered with cheap dirty minivans, utility trucks and SUVs. In the showroom some “tribal people" from south of the border (no offense intended to anyone) drooling over a Mustang and the Harley Davidson truck with the popdown DVD player. Within a nanosecond the used car salesman type with the yellow tie and overhung gut materializes. I am dressed in shorts and a Polo shirt and I could tell he was eyeing the Ford Escort for me. “OMFG you want the Ford GT !!!!” and I was surprised he actually took this seriously. Within 10 seconds there are five other people including the sales manager, and she is trying to a shove the GT down my throat to the tune of $200K.

After that and prior to the Leipzig trip with Ben (CGT pre-delivery) it was an EASY choice between the 360CS and Gallardo and following the trip it was ONLY GT3. It is almost impossible to appreciate how incredible the GT3 is unless you have been to the Porsche track with factory drivers and witness the performance and endurance of this machine.

FYI the Ford GT was recently recalled for life threatening safety issues and Japan has nothing remotely close to a Ford GT.

http://www.detnews.com/2004/autosins...utos-37905.htm

Now if you doubt my safety claims about the Z06 have a close look at the frame “protecting” the driver in the picture above. Compare that to a full steel cage or the CGT CF cockpit for a really good laugh. They compromised YOUR life for 0 to 60 times buddy and they are laughing all the way to the bank.
Old 01-13-2005, 04:58 PM
  #58  
e6tme
Rennlist Member
 
e6tme's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: USofA
Posts: 321
Received 9 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by quartermile
FYI the Ford GT was recently recalled for life threatening safety issues and Japan has nothing remotely close to a Ford GT.

http://www.detnews.com/2004/autosins...utos-37905.htm

Now if you doubt my safety claims about the Z06 have a close look at the frame “protecting” the driver in the picture above. Compare that to a full steel cage or the CGT CF cockpit for a really good laugh. They compromised YOUR life for 0 to 60 times buddy and they are laughing all the way to the bank.
I really don't understand your alarmist attitude about the Z06 and Ford GT being "life threatening." I looked at the above picture... so? Are you an engineer that has studied the structure and alloy used to make a claim that it is any more or less safe than the roof structure in a 911?

There haven't been any failures on the Ford GT, the recall is preemptive, so why is it "life threatening?"

I could make some equally baseless argument about a 911 being less safe than a Z06 in a front end collision because it doesn't have a big lump of an engine in front to absorb the impact...
Old 01-13-2005, 05:20 PM
  #59  
Cupcar
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
Cupcar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: California Boardwalk, Skanderborg Denmark
Posts: 3,693
Received 100 Likes on 68 Posts
Default

I imagine Porsche is totally compromising many lives by producing a 911 Cabriolet without a roll bar.

If anyone is laughing on the way to the bank it's Porsche with the highest per unit profit of any car manufacturer.
Old 01-13-2005, 05:37 PM
  #60  
Holger B
Race Car
 
Holger B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: SF
Posts: 3,945
Received 87 Likes on 34 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by e6tme
I could make some equally baseless argument about a 911 being less safe than a Z06 in a front end collision because it doesn't have a big lump of an engine in front to absorb the impact...
I'm no engineer, but I'm willing to bet that big crush zone in the front of the 911 is among the safest of any car on the road today. It's all about absorbing energy...


Quick Reply: Anybody get their new Car and Driver?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 01:08 AM.