Notices
996 Forum 1999-2005
Sponsored by:

Maintenance Costs: 996 Carrera vs Saab 9-3 Viggen (or other cars in general)

Old 04-07-2017, 04:30 PM
  #46  
Kalashnikov
Three Wheelin'
 
Kalashnikov's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 1,470
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

For 1999 quickest cars. Carrera is #4 on the list, matching the 0-60 times for Diablo Roadster.

http://sportscarstandings.com/Top-10-Fastest-Cars/1999
Old 04-07-2017, 05:50 PM
  #47  
5CHN3LL
Race Director
 
5CHN3LL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: SOcialist republic of CALifornia
Posts: 10,423
Received 211 Likes on 155 Posts
Default

Heh. 0-60 times reached diminishing returns what, a decade ago?

I'm glad the world has people for whom half-a-tenth less to 60MPH is worth another $50K, or $150K, or $500K...but I don't think I'll ever be one of 'em.
Old 04-12-2017, 02:05 PM
  #48  
curtsr
Advanced
 
curtsr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Posts: 96
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by curtsr
They are super cars, but they are not Supercars. I share your enthusiasm for the 996 but, respectfully, to say that the 996 (even a TT) is a Supercar is just too much of a stretch.

My C4S's performance (fuel mileage aside ) pales compared to my CTT-S and no self-respecting Supercar should get spanked by an SUV of the same vintage.

YMMV lol...
Originally Posted by 5CHN3LL
Well, for the sake of being accurate: the 996 was considered an everyday supercar in 1999. Of course, 300HP in a 3,000 pound package in 2017 is no longer supercar territory.

None of the SUVs I drove in 1999 did 0-60 in 5 seconds...
My C4S is an '03 and my Cayenne an '05 so my frame of reference was that time frame but I suppose that in the 90's the Supercar bar was lower. My '95 NSX was lauded as an "exotic" and "supercar" but to me it never approached that pantheon- until it got FI and tripled it's original 272 HP output. That changed the personality of the car considerably and while not necessarily all for the better in my mind it made it more "super".

Originally Posted by Kalashnikov
For 1999 quickest cars. Carrera is #4 on the list, matching the 0-60 times for Diablo Roadster.
0-60 times are great benchmarks but that really isn't entirely what the term "supercar" means to me. Curb appeal is a large part too IMHO. Roll up anywhere in the Diablo Roadster and then make the same entrance in a 996 and I just don't think you'll get the same reception. Jaws will slacken and possibly hit that same curb at the sight of the Diablo but the 996 probably wouldn't be received the same way. Top speed is another benchmark that's another virtually worthless stat but it serves to help sort out the pecking order.

Originally Posted by 5CHN3LL
Heh. 0-60 times reached diminishing returns what, a decade ago?
Agreed but it's meaningful for bench racing.

Don't get me wrong I really enjoy and appreciate my 996. It's a sweetheart and with the yellow widebody a looker in its own right but I suppose deep down I'm just too pragmatic.
Old 04-12-2017, 02:32 PM
  #49  
TonyTwoBags
Three Wheelin'
 
TonyTwoBags's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 1,946
Likes: 0
Received 17 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

A local guy posted something a few months back about the 0-60 in his 981 Boxster being "ok". I reminded him that 981s & Pcars in general shine between 60 and 160, nevermind the stoplight stats.
Old 04-12-2017, 05:59 PM
  #50  
5CHN3LL
Race Director
 
5CHN3LL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: SOcialist republic of CALifornia
Posts: 10,423
Received 211 Likes on 155 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by TonyTwoBags
A local guy posted something a few months back about the 0-60 in his 981 Boxster being "ok". I reminded him that 981s & Pcars in general shine between 60 and 160, nevermind the stoplight stats.
What are you talking about? The 996 is a drag mo-sheen! The way the engineers use wheel hop and clutch smoke - instead of some ***** "launch mode" button - to get the 996's unbridled fury down to the road is sheer genius. You wouldn't think a neck-snapping, kidney-bursting torque monster like the M96 could be tamed with such seemingly barbaric techniques, but the end result is completely driveable.
Old 04-12-2017, 06:31 PM
  #51  
TonyTwoBags
Three Wheelin'
 
TonyTwoBags's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 1,946
Likes: 0
Received 17 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

Wheel hop & clutch smoke is very apt for 996 'burnouts'

Maybe we're just doing it wrong & need to go buy Hellcats & Skynyrd tats.
Old 04-12-2017, 06:54 PM
  #52  
808Bill
Rennlist Member
 
808Bill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Kauai
Posts: 8,054
Received 805 Likes on 543 Posts
Default

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=...52180690,d.cGc

Old 04-12-2017, 08:24 PM
  #53  
5CHN3LL
Race Director
 
5CHN3LL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: SOcialist republic of CALifornia
Posts: 10,423
Received 211 Likes on 155 Posts
Default

Yes, and the Tiburon that has two turbocharged engines does great burnouts.

(Obviously they spent the real money on the Tiburons and not the potatocam used to film this mess.) The seemingly inexplicable appearance of a man in drag - including pearls - @ :55 makes the video that much more special.
Old 04-12-2017, 09:41 PM
  #54  
PeaCar
Intermediate
 
PeaCar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The Saab is a better made car, lasts a lot longer, and doesn't tend to suffer from as many catastrophic engine failures. The other thing, the Viggen as you know, outperforms the 996 in mid range acceleration, so you aren't buying a "faster car" unless driving 160mph+ is a requirement lol. The 9-5 Aero and Viggen are phenomenal values considering the peanuts it costs to buy one.

The Saab B235 engines can sludge up, but generally only if oil changes have been missed. If the car has a perfect service history, you will struggle to find a better made car that will last as long. The world is filled with Saabs that have 500,000+ on their original engines. Very very few Porsches have managed that.

Now a late Saab 9000 Aero with a 5-speed...with some minor mods you have a car that will outperform a 996 and make a lot of Porsche fans very very angry.

You will spend a lot more when things go wrong on a 996. These cars are plagued with issues in comparison. I mean really...I owned a lot of Saabs, 2000s era Porsches are very disappointing, especially compared to 1980s Saabs which last forever.

Expect a large uptick in stress and expenses, you've been warned.

And to this day, I have never driven a car as fun as a classic Saab 900 turbo, good god...that road feel is on par with an Aircooled 911.
Old 04-12-2017, 09:48 PM
  #55  
dan_189
Race Car
 
dan_189's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 3,744
Received 125 Likes on 110 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by PeaCar

Expect a large uptick in stress and expenses, you've been warned.
Also time spent on rennlist reading about all the other 996 issues people are facing and hoping it doesn't happen to you...

Then you go to the garage, admire for a second and then drive and you smile because it's all worth it

Also you can be happy that the manufacturer that made your car is still in existence :-p
Old 04-12-2017, 10:15 PM
  #56  
PeaCar
Intermediate
 
PeaCar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by dan_189
Also time spent on rennlist reading about all the other 996 issues people are facing and hoping it doesn't happen to you...

Then you go to the garage, admire for a second and then drive and you smile because it's all worth it

Also you can be happy that the manufacturer that made your car is still in existence :-p
^ 996 ownership experience summed up.
Old 04-13-2017, 12:37 AM
  #57  
FRUNKenstein
Rennlist Member
 
FRUNKenstein's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Overland Park, KS
Posts: 6,013
Received 297 Likes on 171 Posts
Default

Let's not forget he's talking about buying an $11,000 car, fellas. For all of the dire warnings, his maximum loss on the car is about $5k if the engine lets loose and he sells the carcass as a roller.

A set of Sumi HTRZIIIs for the rear: $133 each at Tirerack. Add shipping/mounting/balancing and you're at well under $400 for the set. That's plenty of tire for a $11k 996.

And $5k for maintenance? I know it's possible. But I haven't spent anywhere near that over the past 4+ years total on my two 996s combined.

Don't overthink it. Fix stuff WHEN it breaks, not because it MIGHT break. There's a good chance you'll drive that car for 2 or 3 years with minimal maintenance and sell it for what you paid for it.

And compared to the 2 Land Rovers I've owned, the 996s have been like freaking Honda Accords reliability-wise.
Old 04-13-2017, 01:37 AM
  #58  
TonyTwoBags
Three Wheelin'
 
TonyTwoBags's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 1,946
Likes: 0
Received 17 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by PeaCar
And to this day, I have never driven a car as fun as a classic Saab 900 turbo, good god...that road feel is on par with an Aircooled 911.
People sleep on those cars, but they are fun as hell. The 996 only passes it at higher speed. A 900 turbo out of tight corners is a feeling to remember.

Tried to nudge my dad towards buying the black CE 93 turbo on Bring A Trailer last month, but failed. We both tracked the auction up til the end though, so there's hope.
Old 04-13-2017, 03:29 AM
  #59  
m3driver
Racer
 
m3driver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 473
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by PeaCar
The Saab is a better made car, lasts a lot longer, and doesn't tend to suffer from as many catastrophic engine failures. The other thing, the Viggen as you know, outperforms the 996 in mid range acceleration, so you aren't buying a "faster car" unless driving 160mph+ is a requirement lol. The 9-5 Aero and Viggen are phenomenal values considering the peanuts it costs to buy one.

The Saab B235 engines can sludge up, but generally only if oil changes have been missed. If the car has a perfect service history, you will struggle to find a better made car that will last as long. The world is filled with Saabs that have 500,000+ on their original engines. Very very few Porsches have managed that.

Now a late Saab 9000 Aero with a 5-speed...with some minor mods you have a car that will outperform a 996 and make a lot of Porsche fans very very angry.

You will spend a lot more when things go wrong on a 996. These cars are plagued with issues in comparison. I mean really...I owned a lot of Saabs, 2000s era Porsches are very disappointing, especially compared to 1980s Saabs which last forever.

Expect a large uptick in stress and expenses, you've been warned.

And to this day, I have never driven a car as fun as a classic Saab 900 turbo, good god...that road feel is on par with an Aircooled 911.
apparently you've never driven a Chevy celebrity
Old 04-13-2017, 09:52 AM
  #60  
JimmyB
Rennlist Member
 
JimmyB's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: DC
Posts: 451
Received 45 Likes on 31 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by PeaCar
The Saab is a better made car, lasts a lot longer, and doesn't tend to suffer from as many catastrophic engine failures. The other thing, the Viggen as you know, outperforms the 996 in mid range acceleration, so you aren't buying a "faster car" unless driving 160mph+ is a requirement lol. The 9-5 Aero and Viggen are phenomenal values considering the peanuts it costs to buy one.

The Saab B235 engines can sludge up, but generally only if oil changes have been missed. If the car has a perfect service history, you will struggle to find a better made car that will last as long. The world is filled with Saabs that have 500,000+ on their original engines. Very very few Porsches have managed that.

Now a late Saab 9000 Aero with a 5-speed...with some minor mods you have a car that will outperform a 996 and make a lot of Porsche fans very very angry.

You will spend a lot more when things go wrong on a 996. These cars are plagued with issues in comparison. I mean really...I owned a lot of Saabs, 2000s era Porsches are very disappointing, especially compared to 1980s Saabs which last forever.

Expect a large uptick in stress and expenses, you've been warned.

And to this day, I have never driven a car as fun as a classic Saab 900 turbo, good god...that road feel is on par with an Aircooled 911.
+900

I must have had 14 or 15 Saabs. Started with a 1974 99, then seven or eight 900s, half of them turbocharged, three of them convertibles. Current one is a last-of-the-line '94, ruby red with tan top. It's beautiful. And they're starting to fetch serious money - a one-owner car just made $18k on BAT. There's another one up now which I'll watch with interest.

Years back I had a 9000 CSE with the light pressure turbo which was fantastic for road trips. Replaced it with my first ever brand new car, a Cosmic Blue 9-5 Aero wagon, which might still perhaps be the best car I've ever owned.

RIP Saab - getting all misty-eyed here

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: Maintenance Costs: 996 Carrera vs Saab 9-3 Viggen (or other cars in general)



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 04:04 PM.