Notices
996 Forum 1999-2005
Sponsored by:

How to disable oil filter bypass

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-13-2018, 07:28 PM
  #16  
Porschetech3
Rennlist Member
 
Porschetech3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Alabama USA
Posts: 6,061
Received 4,325 Likes on 1,961 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by USNA1970
I took apart my stock oil filter canister. The bypass in the bottom of the canister will pop out if you pull on it with plyers. The spring bypass mechanism seemed fully intack and still pretty strong. Meaning, I don't think the spring weakened compared to the new canister I purchased. I really wonder how much bypassing really happens if you don't push the car during cold start. I am saying that old spring still seemed to be seating very firmly.
Correct !. The bypass just pops out of the bottom of the canister. That's the only real problem I have with the factory bypass is it sits in the bottom where any heavy metal debris will also sit. Some filter systems have the bypass at the top which is a much better place to bypass. The bypass can open at cold starts when a large pressure differential is present across the filter until the pressure equalizes across the filter.

To answer the OP question (sorry I missed this thread) about disabling the factory bypass, I have been doing this for years on my 3 m96 cars currently on the road. A 99 Coupe, A 99 Cab, and a 986 (with S engine ). Simply by poping out the bypass, cleaning it, and fill the cup with Loctite E-HP120 epoxy, then let it sit overnite and install. I use the K&N Pro Series PS-7011 cartridge filter $5. high flow, has a good internal strength cage to prevent collapse, haven't had a collapse even using M1 5w-50 or even 15w-50 in winter, and yes I do track these cars.

The only issue with disabling the bypass is that it takes a moment to reach max oil pressure on cold starts.Although I feel with the larger surface area of the K&N PS-7011 vs the Napa 1042(non-pypass filter) with similar density filer media of 25-30 microns, the K&N will reach max pressure quicker.

The issue with pressure loss due to a stopped up filter from dirt and extended change intervals should be a non-issue. Most 996 owners change their oil at much more often intervals.If you drive your car long enough for the oil filter to stop up due to dirt, then you need your 996 taken away from you anyway !!
Old 07-03-2018, 01:39 AM
  #17  
Porschetech3
Rennlist Member
 
Porschetech3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Alabama USA
Posts: 6,061
Received 4,325 Likes on 1,961 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by docmirror
Ok, but I'm going to explain why this still doesn't make sense. I'm not adverse to intriguing solutions to failure, but not sure where this goes.

As its name implies, a scavenge pump draws up fluid from a distant location, and returns it to a well. In the oiling system of an engine, it would take the oil AFTER having gone through the circuit(including all the bearings), and delivering it to the sump, where the mag drain plug resides.

Second, presuming the failure mode is ferrous where a magnet would help, we're talking about scarf from the IMSB, IMS, crankshaft, rods, oil pump housing, or cams. I"m guessing there's more Fe in the engine, but these are the big things that release Fe into the circuit. I can presume that if one of the cylinders begins to come apart(D-chunk), we're done for the day, and even the largest magnet in the world will do no good.

Presumably, we're looking at detritus from the failure prone IMSB as it begins to disintegrate. As the IMS and bearings are below the crankshaft, the majority of the oil windage from the IMS and bearing are going to go right in the sump, not anywhere near the scavenge pumps, as they say - Elvis(oil) has left the pressure circuit. But - I will admit that I have no idea where they are in the engine, it would be strange to find them near, or below the IMS, where they might be suitable to put a magnet for protection. I'm willing to be advised otherwise of course.

Lastly, as I mentioned, a magnet presumes to retain the particles in the engine, where they live on forever until the engine is taken down. I want whatever is in there, to come out of there, and leave via the oil, filter, or mag outside the filter, or manual cleaning of the drain plug. I don't want it to stay in the engine where it's another little time bomb just waiting to be released into the oil circuit again.
I can't believe I missed all this talk about scavenge pumps and magnets (yea it was my idea) and the ferrous debris control , but I did, so my 2 cents..

The scavenge pumps are indeed robust and don't give much trouble....unless a piece of metal goes in and they lock-up, then you have catastrophic failure such as a broken timing chain, bent valves, pistons, rods, block,IMS shaft. The scavenge pump is driven by the cam gear, which is driven by the timing chain, which is driven by the IMS shaft, which is driven by the crankshaft. The clearance in the pumps are very small, and it doesn't take but a small piece to lock it up, and if your extremely lucky the pump snout or cam gear will break, and not the timing chain or IMS. I have seen many that break the timing chain and if at high RPM's it will total the engine.

The metal that usually causes the scavenge pump to lock up comes from the valve lifter, valve spring, or a piece of timing chain roller.

Installing a magnet placed at the inlet of the scavenge pump can keep this from happening and catch the debris from entering the pump. It is not there for filtering purpose, but just for debris control and protection. I think Jake does a similar mod on their FSI engines, but they wouldn't elaborate on it (top secret), but maybe a screen on the inlet of the scavenge pump. At any rate it is a way to eliminate a cause of catastrophic engine failure.
Old 11-21-2019, 09:59 AM
  #18  
2005 996 C4S
Intermediate
 
2005 996 C4S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2019
Location: Walpole NH
Posts: 46
Received 33 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Porschetech3
Correct !. The bypass just pops out of the bottom of the canister. That's the only real problem I have with the factory bypass is it sits in the bottom where any heavy metal debris will also sit. Some filter systems have the bypass at the top which is a much better place to bypass. The bypass can open at cold starts when a large pressure differential is present across the filter until the pressure equalizes across the filter.

To answer the OP question (sorry I missed this thread) about disabling the factory bypass, I have been doing this for years on my 3 m96 cars currently on the road. A 99 Coupe, A 99 Cab, and a 986 (with S engine ). Simply by poping out the bypass, cleaning it, and fill the cup with Loctite E-HP120 epoxy, then let it sit overnite and install. I use the K&N Pro Series PS-7011 cartridge filter $5. high flow, has a good internal strength cage to prevent collapse, haven't had a collapse even using M1 5w-50 or even 15w-50 in winter, and yes I do track these cars.

The only issue with disabling the bypass is that it takes a moment to reach max oil pressure on cold starts.Although I feel with the larger surface area of the K&N PS-7011 vs the Napa 1042(non-pypass filter) with similar density filer media of 25-30 microns, the K&N will reach max pressure quicker.

The issue with pressure loss due to a stopped up filter from dirt and extended change intervals should be a non-issue. Most 996 owners change their oil at much more often intervals.If you drive your car long enough for the oil filter to stop up due to dirt, then you need your 996 taken away from you anyway !!
Hi there, sorry to resurrect an old thread. Great information you are providing here. I was debating getting the LN Engineering spin on to eliminate the bypass however your idea here looks better. This would save money and allow the use of the paper filter which I like for ease of analysis. Would you be able to expand on 2 things for me? You refer to cleaning the bypass, do you use something specific to get all the oil off it to allow adhesion of the locktite product? I haven't looked at this item other than the one time it fell out when i first changed the oil in the car and had to wonder where it came from. You said to fill the cup with locktite, is that the silver little cup on top of it?

Thank you in advance, Not new to working on cars however new to Porsche. I just picked up my first this past June. 2005 996 C4S 26k miles.

Rick
Old 11-21-2019, 04:12 PM
  #19  
Porschetech3
Rennlist Member
 
Porschetech3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Alabama USA
Posts: 6,061
Received 4,325 Likes on 1,961 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 2005 996 C4S
Hi there, sorry to resurrect an old thread. Great information you are providing here. I was debating getting the LN Engineering spin on to eliminate the bypass however your idea here looks better. This would save money and allow the use of the paper filter which I like for ease of analysis. Would you be able to expand on 2 things for me? You refer to cleaning the bypass, do you use something specific to get all the oil off it to allow adhesion of the locktite product? I haven't looked at this item other than the one time it fell out when i first changed the oil in the car and had to wonder where it came from. You said to fill the cup with locktite, is that the silver little cup on top of it?

Thank you in advance, Not new to working on cars however new to Porsche. I just picked up my first this past June. 2005 996 C4S 26k miles.

Rick
Hi, just pop the by-pass out of the plastic can, clean it with brake or carb cleaner then use some rubbbing alcohol on it to remove all the oil. Turn it upside down and fill the plastic cup on the spring side full of epoxy. Fill all around the spring and in the center of the spring untill about level on the cup. Use Loctite E-120hp , it is high temp and oil resistant and adheres to plastic and metal alike. Allow 24 hrs to cure before reinstalling. Simple to do and will stop any oil from bypassing the filter while maintaining the ease of inspection of the filter and retaining the larger capacity filter to allow quicker/more oil flow on cold start compared to the smaller spin on filter element.
Old 11-21-2019, 07:37 PM
  #20  
2005 996 C4S
Intermediate
 
2005 996 C4S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2019
Location: Walpole NH
Posts: 46
Received 33 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Porschetech3
Hi, just pop the by-pass out of the plastic can, clean it with brake or carb cleaner then use some rubbbing alcohol on it to remove all the oil. Turn it upside down and fill the plastic cup on the spring side full of epoxy. Fill all around the spring and in the center of the spring untill about level on the cup. Use Loctite E-120hp , it is high temp and oil resistant and adheres to plastic and metal alike. Allow 24 hrs to cure before reinstalling. Simple to do and will stop any oil from bypassing the filter while maintaining the ease of inspection of the filter and retaining the larger capacity filter to allow quicker/more oil flow on cold start compared to the smaller spin on filter element.
Thank you very much for the reply and clarification. I agree with you 100%. Keep the benefits of the OEM Filter and eliminate the bypass. This has been added to my winter maintenance / upgrade list for while my car is hibernating this winter. I have plenty of time up here in the north east as I wait for them to stop salting the roads... Thanks again!
Old 11-22-2019, 12:18 AM
  #21  
pdxmotorhead
Three Wheelin'
 
pdxmotorhead's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2019
Location: USA/Oregon
Posts: 1,675
Received 393 Likes on 292 Posts
Default

If you do some comparisons,, bigger filter does not always = better performance,,
The bypass in the pump is sufficient, if the filter plugged things have gone way
way wrong already.. IMHO..

A lot of german cars use "wet" filters, it makes a quick easy way to see scarf in the oil..
They also have a common failure,, the silly plastic housings and caps..

My 69 911,, used a standard Spin on filter and it was the same size that is used in a Ford Pickup..
It also was mounted right on the dry sump tank. That held over 2 gallons of oil. (For a 2.0 liter engine.)

I've tried a lot of filter setups on race cars,, standard spin-ons have the least problems in my experience.
You can buy Aluminum replacement cans for some engines that use wet filters,, which is what I did on one car it worked well.

You also have to consider that about a million VW bugs that got the crap drove out of them with nothing
but a screen on the oil pickup make 150 or 200K..

At the end of the day,, OEM filters are a compromise to get the engine to the end of the
warranty and cost the manufacturer the minimum amount of money to do it.
The 996 really is the poster child of a exotic that's design was micromanaged
by accountants..




Old 11-22-2019, 12:43 AM
  #22  
Porschetech3
Rennlist Member
 
Porschetech3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Alabama USA
Posts: 6,061
Received 4,325 Likes on 1,961 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by pdxmotorhead
If you do some comparisons,, bigger filter does not always = better performance,,
The bypass in the pump is sufficient, if the filter plugged things have gone way
way wrong already.. IMHO..
True . I agree, but smaller filter rarely = better performance..

Originally Posted by pdxmotorhead
A lot of german cars use "wet" filters, it makes a quick easy way to see scarf in the oil..
They also have a common failure,, the silly plastic housings and caps..
I've many many of the Plastic canisters off while servicing ,and haven't seen one fail. I even epoxy magnets around the outside of mine for even better filtering..
Old 11-23-2019, 12:35 AM
  #23  
pdxmotorhead
Three Wheelin'
 
pdxmotorhead's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2019
Location: USA/Oregon
Posts: 1,675
Received 393 Likes on 292 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Porschetech3
True . I agree, but smaller filter rarely = better performance..

I've many many of the Plastic canisters off while servicing ,and haven't seen one fail. I even epoxy magnets around the outside of mine for even better filtering..
Well it sorta depends on how you define performance,, smaller filters (Used on most cars now,,, )
Fill quicker, so reduce prime time to the system. The working theory that a lot subscribe to
is that the smaller filters somehow flow less, but I've back pressure tested a couple used on
my Jeep which I can get a tall and short filter for,, no difference.. Not flowing 20w50 anyway,,
The resistance to flow was identical with a analog helic gauge.. Now there is probably different filter media,,
and other unknowns,, so we all go with the most comfortable to us choice..

I've replaced several BMW oil filter caps that cracked in use,, they seem to last safely about 50K miles after that your on the timer..
Now these were all heavily tracked cars.. Similar issue to the E46 and onward cooling systems with the
self destruct mode ,, all the plastic gets brittle and typically by 80 to 100 K miles the whole system needs
yarded off and replaced.. (Those that don't often end up replacing the engine...) Also seen it on a couple boats and tractors..


Old 11-23-2019, 01:42 AM
  #24  
Porschetech3
Rennlist Member
 
Porschetech3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Alabama USA
Posts: 6,061
Received 4,325 Likes on 1,961 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by pdxmotorhead
Well it sorta depends on how you define performance,, smaller filters (Used on most cars now,,, )
Fill quicker, so reduce prime time to the system. The working theory that a lot subscribe to
is that the smaller filters somehow flow less, but I've back pressure tested a couple used on
my Jeep which I can get a tall and short filter for,, no difference.. Not flowing 20w50 anyway,,
The resistance to flow was identical with a analog helic gauge.. Now there is probably different filter media,,
and other unknowns,, so we all go with the most comfortable to us choice..

I've replaced several BMW oil filter caps that cracked in use,, they seem to last safely about 50K miles after that your on the timer..
Now these were all heavily tracked cars.. Similar issue to the E46 and onward cooling systems with the
self destruct mode ,, all the plastic gets brittle and typically by 80 to 100 K miles the whole system needs
yarded off and replaced.. (Those that don't often end up replacing the engine...) Also seen it on a couple boats and tractors..
Yea, the smaller filter will fill quicker if it is empty/dry, but that isn't what I mean by "performance".

I mean given the same filter media, the one with more surface area will deliver better flow, albeit the smaller one may be perfectly adequate, the larger one will be more than adequate when it comes to equalizing pressure differentials. I'm ok with my choice.

I've had many more leaks with spin on filters(other cars) than with the Porsche plastic canisters.Plus I don't like the mess, it was fine when just throwing the spin on in the recycle bin, but cutting it open, not so much. And that is what we all do on these engines , every oil filter gets the eye-ball test..lol
Old 11-23-2019, 01:56 AM
  #25  
pdxmotorhead
Three Wheelin'
 
pdxmotorhead's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2019
Location: USA/Oregon
Posts: 1,675
Received 393 Likes on 292 Posts
Default

I've never had a spin on leak,, and that's a lot of years and cars,, good point there that we all have had different items fail..
And folks do tend to dodge the most familiar problems.

I actually prefer a Oberg, with a remote spin on mounted closed end down.. But its not a uber practical setup on a street car..
Old 11-23-2019, 04:24 AM
  #26  
Porschetech3
Rennlist Member
 
Porschetech3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Alabama USA
Posts: 6,061
Received 4,325 Likes on 1,961 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by pdxmotorhead
I've never had a spin on leak,, and that's a lot of years and cars,, good point there that we all have had different items fail..
And folks do tend to dodge the most familiar problems.

I actually prefer a Oberg, with a remote spin on mounted closed end down.. But its not a uber practical setup on a street car..
Right,I have worked in Dealerships for over 40 years, so I have seen just about everything fail. The first canister type oil filter I had become familiar with the Boxster/996, I wasn't impressed at first, but It grew on me since looking at the filter is so important on the m96 engine.

The biggest problems with the leaks on spin-on filters were caused by the torque spec was always "hand tight" which ended up being way too much or way too little many times.Or assuming the old O-ring came off with the old filter and ending up with a double O-ringed (which won't seal well or for long). I have seen that happen so many times I couldn't count them. I only had it happen to me personally once !!

I lost a race engine (in the final round) back in 1979 due to the old "double O-ring failure" of the spin-on filters FL1HP. Late nite last minute prep, fresh oil and filter ( the old rubber O-ring stuck to the block unnoticed). held up fine until the final round. O-ring let go at 9k rpms in second gear, engine locked up and twisted the crankshaft !!! That was an expensive Second Place Finish Race ....
Old 11-23-2019, 09:02 PM
  #27  
pdxmotorhead
Three Wheelin'
 
pdxmotorhead's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2019
Location: USA/Oregon
Posts: 1,675
Received 393 Likes on 292 Posts
Default

Yep,, its AMAZING how fast a engine is empty when a line or filter comes off.
I always wipe the filter boss clean,, I want to see metal not rubber..

I started out doing oil changes in my early teens and I managed to not screw one up...

I was lucky I started out in a shop that worked on everything from a MG midget to a Kenworth.
Tought me you can't be too comfortable, there is always some engineer that thinks he has a better idea.
Like my 94 Jeep, they came with either a metric or a SAE fitting, adn the darn things will thread on
either one, but only one stays on..



Quick Reply: How to disable oil filter bypass



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 01:24 AM.