Notices
996 Forum 1999-2005
Sponsored by:

Please help - about to pull the trigger on this one

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-05-2016, 02:34 PM
  #16  
Slakker
Rennlist Member
 
Slakker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Edmond, OK
Posts: 4,756
Received 245 Likes on 112 Posts
Default

B3 is our resident 996 PI. Nice work B3!

And I agree, "This is not the 996 you are looking for."
Old 12-05-2016, 02:38 PM
  #17  
Bash Hat
Three Wheelin'
 
Bash Hat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: West Hollywood, CA
Posts: 1,449
Received 414 Likes on 193 Posts
Default

B3, are you able to pull up any info on this one I'm looking at? WP0AA29994S621892

Apologies for the thread hijack. Won't happen again....
Old 12-05-2016, 02:55 PM
  #18  
ZuffenZeus
Nordschleife Master
 
ZuffenZeus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Zuffenhausen, Georgia
Posts: 5,268
Received 1,831 Likes on 1,004 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Bash Hat
B3, are you able to pull up any info on this one I'm looking at? WP0AA29994S621892

Apologies for the thread hijack. Won't happen again....

Hey man, I saw that car before in the other thread. Nothing really stands out other than the PO changed out a lot of the factory parts:
1. Factory air box removed to K&N cold air intake. If it were me, I'd put the factory one back on.
2. Original Turbo Twist wheels changed out with 18" GT3 wheel. They're nice and complement car very well. I'd keep them on.
3. Factory installed Bose system removed and a newer Pioneer system installed. I wouldn't trust anything left in the car is genuine Bose. The original Bose IMHO, was an incredible setup that included 12 speaker design with subwoofer and processor/amp. Shame it's gone, but the new system looks really nice.

You really need a picture of the hood sticker in the frunk to know more. But it's a beautiful car. Like the other car, it's really hard to know the service history unless you have invoices from Porsche. The price is right given the miles, but that doesn't mean anything when it comes to the IMS issue.
Old 12-05-2016, 03:01 PM
  #19  
Bash Hat
Three Wheelin'
 
Bash Hat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: West Hollywood, CA
Posts: 1,449
Received 414 Likes on 193 Posts
Default

Thanks B3. I'll try to swing by and take a pic of the sticker.
Old 12-05-2016, 03:06 PM
  #20  
ZuffenZeus
Nordschleife Master
 
ZuffenZeus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Zuffenhausen, Georgia
Posts: 5,268
Received 1,831 Likes on 1,004 Posts
Default

Cool... post the hood sticker and we'll see if it lines up with the car. I just looked over the CarFax... not much to offer. The only concern is the first owner basically drove just 3656 miles in the first 5 years. That may sound like a good thing, but for a M65 based Porsche 996, it's not. Fortunately, the last owner looked like he made it a daily driver and put the majority of the miles on it. The IMS thing (given the history) would concern me. The only way to get a better picture, is to contact the original Porsche dealership that sold the car and see how often it was serviced. Again, very nice car and if you can get some $$$ knocked off the price, it would be a great deal. Cheers!
Old 12-05-2016, 03:16 PM
  #21  
Bash Hat
Three Wheelin'
 
Bash Hat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: West Hollywood, CA
Posts: 1,449
Received 414 Likes on 193 Posts
Default

Thank you B3!!
Old 12-06-2016, 11:34 AM
  #22  
Mike Murphy
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
Mike Murphy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 8,891
Received 1,704 Likes on 1,055 Posts
Default

I decided not to pull the trigger on this one. Thanks to you awesome guys on this forum. There were just too many things that didn't add up. It's not good that the dealer listed options that didn't line up. There were quite a few other warning signs as well.

I called them and asked, "Does this car have Xenon headlights?" They said, "Yes, it does, Xenon headlights." I said that the options code on the car indicates that it doesn't. The sales guy yelled over to the owner, "Xenon headlights, right?" The response was, "Yes, Xenon headlights." The sales guy then said, "I have the 'Porsh' mechanic here right now - he's been doing this 30+ years to answer any questions you have." I said, sure, I'll talk to him. When I got him on the phone, I asked if the car had Xenon headlights and he said, "Yes, it does." I then pointed out that the pictures of the car and options code says otherwise. They both quickly backtracked and said "Halogen."

As for the ticking noise, nobody at the dealership remembers or recalls any ticking noise. The mechanic said that the car just needs to be run due to it sitting, which I tend to agree with when it comes to lifters, in general, but after there were so many inconsistencies and things said by the owner and sales guy, I realized that I couldn't trust anything else that was said about the car.

In the end, though, I'm actually thinking that a 1999 996 is the real car I'm after, because:

1.) They are cheaper
2.) The double-roller IMS bearing appears to be more reliable??
Old 12-06-2016, 11:43 AM
  #23  
ZuffenZeus
Nordschleife Master
 
ZuffenZeus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Zuffenhausen, Georgia
Posts: 5,268
Received 1,831 Likes on 1,004 Posts
Default

hahaha.... you could have kept that going... like,

Um, ok since we've established it doesn't have Xenon lights.
How about this...
1. Where are the washers that you have listed?
2. The Bose stereo system tell me about that again.
3. And, those don't look like OEM Porsche Sport Seats... where are you hiding them?
4. And lastly, please explain all these fancy "additional options" that don't exist on the hood tag or even in the actual car.

hahaha... I could go on and on. I love the line "I have a *Porsch* mechanic here right now - he's been doing this 30+ years". hahaha
Old 12-06-2016, 11:52 AM
  #24  
Mike Murphy
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
Mike Murphy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 8,891
Received 1,704 Likes on 1,055 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by b3freak
Cool...
By the way, how far away are you from Loganville, GA? There's a '99 Cab there... And it's an ultra-rare "S" model! Actually, it was sold yesterday, I just heard...
Old 12-06-2016, 12:20 PM
  #25  
jaetee
Rennlist Member
 
jaetee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Tarpon Springs, FL
Posts: 553
Received 19 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

PM sent...
Old 12-06-2016, 12:21 PM
  #26  
jaetee
Rennlist Member
 
jaetee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Tarpon Springs, FL
Posts: 553
Received 19 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by murphyslaw1978
By the way, how far away are you from Loganville, GA? There's a '99 Cab there... And it's an ultra-rare "S" model! Actually, it was sold yesterday, I just heard...
I'm pretty sure that car was a normal 996 with an S sticker added to the back.
Old 12-06-2016, 03:07 PM
  #27  
dporto
Rennlist Member
 
dporto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: L.I. NY
Posts: 6,788
Received 1,165 Likes on 795 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by murphyslaw1978
By the way, how far away are you from Loganville, GA? There's a '99 Cab there... And it's an ultra-rare "S" model! Actually, it was sold yesterday, I just heard...
"I'm pretty sure that car was a normal 996 with an S sticker added to the back."

I think ML78's reference was strictly tongue in cheek...
Old 12-06-2016, 04:14 PM
  #28  
TonyTwoBags
Three Wheelin'
 
TonyTwoBags's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 1,946
Likes: 0
Received 17 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by murphyslaw1978
In the end, though, I'm actually thinking that a 1999 996 is the real car I'm after.
Just fyi, 99 is probably your lowest cost/mile option for a 996. While the double row 1999 IMSb is the consensus best OEM unit for a 996, it requires a bit of gamble in leaving the ball bearing design in the car. If you buy a 996.2 with a single row that's relatively low mileage and has a well-running engine, you can zap the IMS bearing failure with the solution. More cost without question, and the intermediate shaft itself can still breakdown regardless of the upgraded bearing. But one failure mode removed is one failure mode removed.

It more or less comes down to a question of how important these things are & how much $$ they mean to you:

- extra 0.2L displacement of the 3.6L & accompanying 20hp
- ability to install IMS solution vs. rely on low failure rate of double row 99s
- glovebox in 996.2

more here --> https://rennlist.com/forums/996-foru...d-to-mkii.html

These days I spend time drooling over mk1 aeros and GT3s of both iterations while obsessively scouring the interwebs for parts to make my mk2 C2 just a little more betterer.
Old 12-06-2016, 04:43 PM
  #29  
Mike Murphy
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
Mike Murphy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 8,891
Received 1,704 Likes on 1,055 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by TonyTwoBags
Just fyi, 99 is probably your lowest cost/mile option for a 996. While the double row 1999 IMSb is the consensus best OEM unit for a 996, it requires a bit of gamble in leaving the ball bearing design in the car. If you buy a 996.2 with a single row that's relatively low mileage and has a well-running engine, you can zap the IMS bearing failure with the solution. More cost without question, and the intermediate shaft itself can still breakdown regardless of the upgraded bearing. But one failure mode removed is one failure mode removed.

It more or less comes down to a question of how important these things are & how much $$ they mean to you:

- extra 0.2L displacement of the 3.6L & accompanying 20hp
- ability to install IMS solution vs. rely on low failure rate of double row 99s
- glovebox in 996.2

more here --> https://rennlist.com/forums/996-foru...d-to-mkii.html

These days I spend time drooling over mk1 aeros and GT3s of both iterations while obsessively scouring the interwebs for parts to make my mk2 C2 just a little more betterer.
All great points. I had a 2000 Boxster S and very much enjoyed the larger engine, more torque, etc. I'd say the newer the 911, the better, generally, but the 1999 is an older decade, and has an old-school way about it that draws me to it. I generally try to stay away from the 1st gen of any car, but I haven't heard about too many major issues with the '99s to scare me away.

Also, does the '99 have cup holders? For some reason, I though that they did not.
Old 12-06-2016, 04:46 PM
  #30  
ZuffenZeus
Nordschleife Master
 
ZuffenZeus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Zuffenhausen, Georgia
Posts: 5,268
Received 1,831 Likes on 1,004 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by murphyslaw1978
Also, does the '99 have cup holders? For some reason, I though that they did not.
Rule #1 - Never, ever buy a Porsche for it's cup holders. ha!

seriously, not sure, but I know they didn't come with a glove compartment.




Quick Reply: Please help - about to pull the trigger on this one



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 05:37 PM.