Notices
996 Forum 1999-2005
Sponsored by:

2002 996 C4: Bore Score, Valves or?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-03-2016, 09:14 PM
  #46  
Flat6 Innovations
Former Vendor
 
Flat6 Innovations's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Cleveland Georgia
Posts: 6,968
Received 2,282 Likes on 899 Posts
Default

The only way an intake could make this occur is if the MAF sensor is placed outside the air inlet path enough to reduce the sensor reading. If this happens fuel trim can be added, making for a rich engine, and that causes smoke and oil consumption.

Check short and long term fuel trim with the engine at 180F coolant temp, and 200F oil temp, at idle, with the AC off. Report the readings.
Old 11-03-2016, 09:29 PM
  #47  
Schnell Gelb
Drifting
 
Schnell Gelb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 2,333
Likes: 0
Received 23 Likes on 18 Posts
Default

He mention aftermarket CAI.
I wonder if part of the intake after the MAf is slightly disconnected ?It isvery difficult to visually check this -hence my enthusiasm for the smoke test.
Old 11-03-2016, 09:43 PM
  #48  
Flat6 Innovations
Former Vendor
 
Flat6 Innovations's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Cleveland Georgia
Posts: 6,968
Received 2,282 Likes on 899 Posts
Default

No, I question is the MAF sensor is located in the primary air stream of the intake. Most of these are not, and it leads to issues.
Old 11-03-2016, 11:32 PM
  #49  
Bradstock
Advanced
Thread Starter
 
Bradstock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 95
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Flat6 Innovations
No, I question is the MAF sensor is located in the primary air stream of the intake. Most of these are not, and it leads to issues.
The plot thickens! Thanks for your input; I will look into this tomorrow and report back.
Old 11-04-2016, 12:28 AM
  #50  
Bradstock
Advanced
Thread Starter
 
Bradstock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 95
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

FYI here's a shot of my engine bay so you can see the intake. Not positive it's Fabspeed as I don't have records of that from the previous owner and there are so many lookalikes. Not sure if this is helpful in answering the MAF sensor question, and I'm planning to discuss with the mechanic tomorrow.
Old 11-04-2016, 12:29 PM
  #51  
dporto
Rennlist Member
 
dporto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: L.I. NY
Posts: 6,779
Received 1,154 Likes on 791 Posts
Default

That's a stock airbox with the "orange cap" mod... basically stock, sans the airbox resonator chamber...
Old 11-04-2016, 12:44 PM
  #52  
5CHN3LL
Race Director
 
5CHN3LL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: SOcialist republic of CALifornia
Posts: 10,423
Received 211 Likes on 155 Posts
Default

(and thus the MAF is where it should be re: the airstream from the airbox)

If you decide to get rid of the aftermarket parts, I know a guy who might buy the CF cap.
Old 11-04-2016, 12:49 PM
  #53  
DTMiller
Rennlist Member
 
DTMiller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Summit Point, probably
Posts: 3,566
Received 272 Likes on 160 Posts
Default

Fabspeed indeed calls that a "Cold Air Upgrade Kit" for the low low price of $245 (plus shipping).



http://www.fabspeed.com/996-carrera-...r-upgrade-kit/

A cold air intake would look like this:


Old 11-04-2016, 01:29 PM
  #54  
Schnell Gelb
Drifting
 
Schnell Gelb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 2,333
Likes: 0
Received 23 Likes on 18 Posts
Default

Mr. Miller,
Thanks for posting this glorious photo. Hopefully it is also effective.
Old 11-04-2016, 02:01 PM
  #55  
Bradstock
Advanced
Thread Starter
 
Bradstock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 95
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Thanks everyone. I relayed all your comments about the MAF etc..; mechanic still suggested I replace it with the stock airbox intake boot (part # 99611022157) as it's cheap and may improve the problem. I'm ordering one today and will keep you posted.

Schnell, the existing "upgrade kit" intake is in great condition and I'm happy to sell it; email me at bbens at hotmail for more details.
Old 05-24-2017, 06:23 PM
  #56  
Bradstock
Advanced
Thread Starter
 
Bradstock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 95
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Update 5.5 months later: finally brought the car to Cape Auto in Orange County CA (generally well-regarded here) for an oil change and to help diagnose the frequent but brief left-exhaust cold-start white smoke. They first said that these flat 6 engines by their nature often smoke a bit on cold start, as many have said.

After service and road test/inspection, Cape said the car appears to be in excellent shape, runs well with everything within spec. They found no particles on the cut-open oil filter nor on the magnetic drain plug, RKAT measured 0.6 (perfect .00) VRA measured 1.03 (perfect 1.0). Car still burns a quart of oil every 2-3K miles (within spec I understand), otherwise no issues. The PPI/compression test/leakdown tests 5K miles ago all had excellent results.

I spent a bit more on this car to find a good one ($27K 5/2016 on this well-optioned C4 Cab with 40K miles and excellent service records) and this is the only real flaw I've been able to find. Of course bore scoring is still a possibility, but absent other symptoms both I and the tech at Cape Auto wonder if it's worth pursuing. This is the 3rd shop who has looked at it and I'm now of the mind to stop worrying and enjoy this beast. Thoughts?
Old 05-24-2017, 06:34 PM
  #57  
extanker
Banned
 
extanker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,161
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

yes a quart of oil every 2/3 k is within spec.................for now .....but if you are driving it normal it is too much and it will only get worse ,i bet the first owner beat it up some how
Old 05-24-2017, 06:41 PM
  #58  
Woodman71
Rennlist Member
 
Woodman71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 1,525
Received 246 Likes on 127 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Bradstock
Thoughts?
Sorry if you mentioned this in the thread but have you had it boroscoped?
Old 05-24-2017, 06:41 PM
  #59  
Schnell Gelb
Drifting
 
Schnell Gelb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 2,333
Likes: 0
Received 23 Likes on 18 Posts
Default

Imho - drive it,enjoy it, keep the preventative maintenance up to your current high standard with an Indie you have evidence is trustworthy and competent. Use the correct oil for a slightly worn engine and do replace oil+filter frequently. Ask your Indie about the spin-on filter upgrade? UOA every 10,000 miles to track any deterioration. Not expensive and useful data.Watch for differences developing between Bank 1&2 in the leakdown tests you do over time.

Originally Posted by Bradstock
Update 5.5 months later: finally brought the car to Cape Auto in Orange County CA (generally well-regarded here) for an oil change and to help diagnose the frequent but brief left-exhaust cold-start white smoke. They first said that these flat 6 engines by their nature often smoke a bit on cold start, as many have said.

After service and road test/inspection, Cape said the car appears to be in excellent shape, runs well with everything within spec. They found no particles on the cut-open oil filter nor on the magnetic drain plug, RKAT measured 0.6 (perfect .00) VRA measured 1.03 (perfect 1.0). Car still burns a quart of oil every 2-3K miles (within spec I understand), otherwise no issues. The PPI/compression test/leakdown tests 5K miles ago all had excellent results.

I spent a bit more on this car to find a good one ($27K 5/2016 on this well-optioned C4 Cab with 40K miles and excellent service records) and this is the only real flaw I've been able to find. Of course bore scoring is still a possibility, but absent other symptoms both I and the tech at Cape Auto wonder if it's worth pursuing. This is the 3rd shop who has looked at it and I'm now of the mind to stop worrying and enjoy this beast. Thoughts?
Old 05-25-2017, 12:44 AM
  #60  
dan_189
Race Car
 
dan_189's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 3,747
Received 127 Likes on 112 Posts
Default

If the MAF is indeed at fault/in question as Jake mentioned maybe its the removal of the resonator box as this makes mention that it does more than just reduce intake noise:



This is also why i've been sceptical regarding the orange cap mod/removing the Helmholtz resonator.

Also as DT has mentioned OP has the fabspeed "CAI" the other image with the two pods is their "competition" intake. I'm not a fan of either for various reasons.


Quick Reply: 2002 996 C4: Bore Score, Valves or?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 08:15 AM.