Notices
996 Forum 1999-2005
Sponsored by:

Are you a gambler? Would you buy it?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-19-2015, 09:43 PM
  #16  
FRUNKenstein
Rennlist Member
 
FRUNKenstein's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Overland Park, KS
Posts: 6,015
Received 303 Likes on 173 Posts
Default

I believe the bigger bearings have proved to have a less than a 1% failure rate, which is why they were excluded from the IMS settlement. I suspect there is no way to tell which bearing you have without dropping the engine or transmission.
If it has the smaller bearing, concur with swapping it out with the LNE bearing.
I put no stock in the cursed car theory. It's a machine, not a mentally disturbed woman. What are we, freaking gypsies or something?
Old 01-19-2015, 10:01 PM
  #17  
lingpoen
Racer
 
lingpoen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Oceanside, CA
Posts: 363
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

run....
Old 01-19-2015, 10:33 PM
  #18  
c4racer
Pro
 
c4racer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 596
Received 53 Likes on 41 Posts
Default

Yes based on what I'm hearing I would run far fast and far. There are so many no story cars out there for cheap. This one would have to be under $15k for me to even think about thinking about it.
Old 01-19-2015, 10:41 PM
  #19  
Fracture
Rennlist Member
 
Fracture's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: midwest...near the ocean
Posts: 2,014
Received 260 Likes on 180 Posts
Default

the money and mileage is appealing for a reason

the car has been taken apart twice, engine / transmission taken out
stuff gets missed

what is Manhattan Motors reputation for rebuilding motors ?
Old 01-20-2015, 08:20 AM
  #20  
onewhippedpuppy
Rennlist Member
 
onewhippedpuppy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Wichita, KS
Posts: 1,455
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Kalashnikov
Stay away. Cursed cars are like jinx people, you stay the **** away!

Car is on the third engine after 35k miles. That's like a woman divorced 4 times, and you are considering being her 5th husband.
An RMS is not an engine. An RMS is a cheap seal that tends to leak. An RMS is not a big deal. That car is on engine #2.

Originally Posted by prosled8
I only see one major problem with a rebuild at the dealer. Where did they get the specs to rebuild it to? I thought Porsche never published clearances or tolerances for anything in this engine. How would they know of the crank was good? How would they know if the rod bearing clearances were good? How could they possibly pull off a decent rebuild without the specs to do so. They were guessing... I would guess this car hasn't seen its last engine.
Huh? You really think a dealership would rebuild an engine and warranty their work based on guesswork? A dealership has access to more Porsche engine data than any independent. Dealerships also very rarely venture outside of what Porsche recommends, and in the case of M96 rebuilds they almost always replace, not rebuild. So I suspect any parts that needed replacement were actually replaced.

To the OP, it wouldn't concern me. If it's a good running and driving car with a clean bill of health, I would definitely buy it. That's a good price for a C4S.
Old 01-20-2015, 09:21 AM
  #21  
DCJosh
Advanced
Thread Starter
 
DCJosh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 78
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Thanks for every ones input, I still have a little bit of time to wait until my insurance process is finished with my Cayenne so I am still on the hunt.
Old 01-20-2015, 09:24 AM
  #22  
prosled8
Racer
 
prosled8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Ridgway, CO
Posts: 350
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by onewhippedpuppy
Huh? You really think a dealership would rebuild an engine and warranty their work based on guesswork? A dealership has access to more Porsche engine data than any independent. Dealerships also very rarely venture outside of what Porsche recommends, and in the case of M96 rebuilds they almost always replace, not rebuild. So I suspect any parts that needed replacement were actually replaced.
YES! I do think they would do just that.

I have NEVER heard of dealerships having access to engine rebuild specs which is exactly why almost none were "rebuilt" at dealerships. Can you verify that this dealer actually had the specs from Porsche in order to effect a quality rebuild?

The onus is on Porsche, not the dealer. The dealer did what Porsche recommended, even if it was beyond the scope of the shops abilities.

I suspect that if dealer techs had access to rebuild specs for these engines they would have leaked to the public a decade ago. The ONLY specs I have heard of are the ones Raby developed based on experience.

I too would run, not walk from this project car.
Old 01-20-2015, 10:35 AM
  #23  
KrazyK
Drifting
 
KrazyK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Texas
Posts: 3,217
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 12 Posts
Default

Stay away. Cursed cars are like jinx people, you stay the **** away!
I agree. Car is brand new, engine blows at 2459 miles??? WTF?? Then that new engine blows up too??? Sounds like another Christine to me but at least that car repaired itself.
Old 01-20-2015, 10:56 AM
  #24  
Kalashnikov
Three Wheelin'
 
Kalashnikov's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 1,470
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by onewhippedpuppy
An RMS is not an engine. An RMS is a cheap seal that tends to leak. An RMS is not a big deal. That car is on engine #2.



Huh? You really think a dealership would rebuild an engine and warranty their work based on guesswork? A dealership has access to more Porsche engine data than any independent. Dealerships also very rarely venture outside of what Porsche recommends, and in the case of M96 rebuilds they almost always replace, not rebuild. So I suspect any parts that needed replacement were actually replaced.

To the OP, it wouldn't concern me. If it's a good running and driving car with a clean bill of health, I would definitely buy it. That's a good price for a C4S.
What? I will attribute your lack of mathematical aptitude to a long 3 day weekend hangover.

02APR2003 - 2,459 miles, engine replaced (Engine #2 goes in)
03MAY2006 - 22,961 miles, RMS fixed
25AUG2009 - 34,167 miles, engine rebuilt due to IMS failure. (Engine #3 goes in)
Old 01-20-2015, 12:45 PM
  #25  
ditto
Racer
 
ditto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Mass
Posts: 424
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

If the third engine was replaced instead of rebuilt I would have no qualms. The way to differentiate the two is to use the engine serial number. It will look like m96/03SAT665 where the AT means rebuild and the 5 means rebuilt in 2005. If it is engine #2 the last digit will be either 2 or 3, if engine #3 is a factory rebuild it will be 9. There is nothing wrong with buying an old car with a fresh engine unless you are paying for a numbers matching hemi.

To read the engine number take a picture of it with a phone. It can be done without jacking the car up.
Old 01-20-2015, 02:06 PM
  #26  
Mark I
Rennlist Member
 
Mark I's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: West Virginia & NRW Germany
Posts: 576
Received 46 Likes on 27 Posts
Default

I'm with the naysayers, Josh. Too much kale for a pig in a poke. Lots of fish in the sea. Tuck your insurance cash away and look patiently for your next car.
Old 01-20-2015, 03:53 PM
  #27  
DTMiller
Rennlist Member
 
DTMiller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Summit Point, probably
Posts: 3,588
Received 323 Likes on 174 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Kalashnikov

What? I will attribute your lack of mathematical aptitude to a long 3 day weekend hangover.

02APR2003 - 2,459 miles, engine replaced (Engine #2 goes in)
03MAY2006 - 22,961 miles, RMS fixed
25AUG2009 - 34,167 miles, engine rebuilt due to IMS failure. (Engine #3 goes in)
Reminds me of a great exchange from "Sports Night"

I'm fluent in four languages you know.
Four?! You speak French, Spanish and German.
I do pretty good in English as well.
Oh, yeah.
Old 01-20-2015, 04:12 PM
  #28  
KrazyK
Drifting
 
KrazyK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Texas
Posts: 3,217
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 12 Posts
Default

I'm with the naysayers, Josh. Too much kale for a pig in a poke.
My brother claims the correct phrase is "Too much sugar for a dime". Not sure why that makes sense to him but he says it often about my projects.
Old 01-20-2015, 07:49 PM
  #29  
DCJosh
Advanced
Thread Starter
 
DCJosh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 78
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I'm not sure what kale, pigs, sugar and dimes have to do with anything...

But,,,,,,

The temptation is so strong....

Like I said, I am still learning about the car so it is great that I am getting feedback from both sides on what I may be in for.

As an Engineering Automotive Technology major here at Minnesota State, we are encouraged to work on our own cars. I figured, what better way to fill my love of Porsche while at the same time, progressing my knowledge of Automotive Systems?

I have a lot to consider, I will keep you all informed as I go.

Again, thank you for the feed back, it is worthwhile.

Regards,

DC Josh
Old 01-20-2015, 11:43 PM
  #30  
onewhippedpuppy
Rennlist Member
 
onewhippedpuppy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Wichita, KS
Posts: 1,455
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Kalashnikov
What? I will attribute your lack of mathematical aptitude to a long 3 day weekend hangover.

02APR2003 - 2,459 miles, engine replaced (Engine #2 goes in)
03MAY2006 - 22,961 miles, RMS fixed
25AUG2009 - 34,167 miles, engine rebuilt due to IMS failure. (Engine #3 goes in)
Actually I may have been drunk when I posted that. They don't teach us that complex math in engineering school. But I would still buy the damn car if I liked it, they're all a crapshoot.


Quick Reply: Are you a gambler? Would you buy it?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 08:27 PM.