Notices
996 Forum 1999-2005
Sponsored by:

Alignment Specs: Post ROW M030 install

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-15-2003, 04:19 AM
  #1  
02 Blue C2
Advanced
Thread Starter
 
02 Blue C2's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Alignment Specs: Post ROW M030 install

I believe that after the ROW is installed on my C2 it will need to have the alignment adjusted. Two questions related to this:

1) Is the alignment spec differrent for the ROW versus the standard for a 2002 C2?

2) Can anyone post what the ROW spec should be?

Thanks in advance,
Gary


Myersville, MD
18" Turbo Look Wheels
Pirelli PZero N4
PSE (no switch)
Twin Exhaust Tips

Last edited by 02 Blue C2; 07-16-2003 at 02:04 PM.
Old 07-15-2003, 06:31 AM
  #2  
Viken
Keeper of the Truth
Lifetime Rennlist
Member

 
Viken's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: So Cal
Posts: 6,486
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

The only significant difference between USA and ROW M030 alignment specs is the front camber.

USA front camber: 0° ± 15'
ROW M030 front camber: - 15' ± 15'

Not much of a difference, if you ask me.
Old 07-15-2003, 07:36 AM
  #3  
02 Blue C2
Advanced
Thread Starter
 
02 Blue C2's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Viken,
Thanks for the reply. Just to make sure I understand, when you say "USA" confirm your talking about the standard M030 or are you talking about the standard (read non M030) suspension?

Thanks,
Gary
Old 07-15-2003, 08:06 AM
  #4  
Viken
Keeper of the Truth
Lifetime Rennlist
Member

 
Viken's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: So Cal
Posts: 6,486
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally posted by 02 Blue C2
Thanks for the reply. Just to make sure I understand, when you say "USA" confirm your talking about the standard M030 or are you talking about the standard (read non M030) suspension?
USA alignment specs are the same for both standard and M030.
Old 07-15-2003, 10:54 AM
  #5  
fahren affair
Pro
 
fahren affair's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Newport Beach, California
Posts: 685
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Factory alignment settings are just a baseline, they're not set in stone. Before my RoW M030 install, rear camber was 2.5 neg and fronts were 0. It's set this way by the factory to suit the lowest common denominator among Porsche drivers i.e. the ham-fisted idiot who will likely over-drive the car and get into trouble. My settings are now, rear: 1.5 degrees neg, front 1 degree neg. The balance now is good, it's a good compromise between street (low tire wear) and track needs (neutral handling).
Old 07-15-2003, 12:12 PM
  #6  
Viken
Keeper of the Truth
Lifetime Rennlist
Member

 
Viken's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: So Cal
Posts: 6,486
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally posted by fahren affair
Factory alignment settings are just a baseline, they're not set in stone. Before my RoW M030 install, rear camber was 2.5 neg and fronts were 0. It's set this way by the factory to suit the lowest common denominator among Porsche drivers i.e. the ham-fisted idiot who will likely over-drive the car and get into trouble. My settings are now, rear: 1.5 degrees neg, front 1 degree neg. The balance now is good, it's a good compromise between street (low tire wear) and track needs (neutral handling).
That is not true. The factory wants to adhere to their specs per workshop manuals. If yours were off, and if they were set like that by the factory, it was a sure mistake. The 2.5 degree negative camber would chew-up the inner tread in a heartbeat if car is mostly driven on highways.
Old 07-15-2003, 12:33 PM
  #7  
ZBlue996Kam
Pro
 
ZBlue996Kam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Collegeville, PA
Posts: 704
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

My tire (both track and street) wear seems to confirm fahren affair claim that the factory might have 0 camber in front and neg 2 to 2.5 at rear.

Track tires:
Wear even at rear
Wear outer half at front

Street tires:
Wear inner half at rear
wear even at front
Old 07-15-2003, 12:52 PM
  #8  
Loren
Drifting
 
Loren's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Roseville, CA USA
Posts: 2,043
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Here are the specs (per Porsche):

Old 07-15-2003, 12:53 PM
  #9  
02 Blue C2
Advanced
Thread Starter
 
02 Blue C2's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Good feedback guy's.

Loren,
Again you come through with the exact information needed, perfect!!!!

Sorry for all the questions, just trying to understand the basics. Of course it is even more interesting to be able to hear the real world experience on the effects of different settings.



Thanks,

Gary

Last edited by 02 Blue C2; 07-15-2003 at 01:00 PM.
Old 07-15-2003, 12:55 PM
  #10  
Viken
Keeper of the Truth
Lifetime Rennlist
Member

 
Viken's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: So Cal
Posts: 6,486
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally posted by 02 Blue C2
If you have access to the factory specs could you post them for all four corners for me? Do the specs only call out camber or do they speak about caster, toe-in and toe- out as well?
I guess Loren beat us to it.
Old 07-15-2003, 08:00 PM
  #11  
Back-n-Black
Instructor
 
Back-n-Black's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Orlando, Florida
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

After all this talk I'm going for the ROW 30 on my C2 Cab. A bit off topic, but I am interested in what it will cost to have the ROW 30 install (less parts) and aligned by a dealer.

TIA
Old 07-15-2003, 09:49 PM
  #12  
fahren affair
Pro
 
fahren affair's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Newport Beach, California
Posts: 685
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally posted by Viken
That is not true. The factory wants to adhere to their specs per workshop manuals. If yours were off, and if they were set like that by the factory, it was a sure mistake. The 2.5 degree negative camber would chew-up the inner tread in a heartbeat if car is mostly driven on highways.
I stand corrected. i pulled the labor ticket from Andial, and it states 1.5 neg rear camber (2.5 after it was lowered and before realignment). I still contend that factory settings make the car 'safe' not fast. It's meant to 'dumb-down' the car for the widest audience of owners/drivers most of which will never track their cars or want to extract to most from it. My current alignment was based on past experience from 10-yrs of bmwcca DEs and suggestions from rennlisters.
Old 07-16-2003, 07:39 AM
  #13  
Viken
Keeper of the Truth
Lifetime Rennlist
Member

 
Viken's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: So Cal
Posts: 6,486
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally posted by fahren affair
I still contend that factory settings make the car 'safe' not fast. It's meant to 'dumb-down' the car for the widest audience of owners/drivers most of which will never track their cars or want to extract to most from it.
Sure, no one is arguing that. Factory settings are nowhere near ideal for any performance driving other than straight line. I believe the original question was asking for the factory settings and not the ideal ones for a specific type of driving.



Quick Reply: Alignment Specs: Post ROW M030 install



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 04:29 AM.