Notices
996 Forum 1999-2005
Sponsored by:

2002 996 c4 - Brake pads & Rotors

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-04-2013 | 04:12 PM
  #1  
rysagreg's Avatar
rysagreg
Thread Starter
Intermediate
 
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 46
Likes: 1
From: Mesa, Arizona
Default 2002 996 c4 - Brake pads & Rotors

Hi All -
My brake sensor warning light came on this week. I am going to replace front and rear pads, rotors and sensors. Street only, no track. Currently I notice there is way too much brake dust. Here is what I am thinking and could use some advice: I saw a post and comments on here from ECU Tuning and looked into a brake kit for approx $800. It is Sebro rotors (the rotors with the small air holes) front & back, and Hawk ceramic pads (front and rear) and they throw in the sensors. Are the hawk ceramic pads okay for daily driver, street only? Brake dust issues? Anything else I may be missing or should look into?
Thanks everyone...
Old 10-05-2013 | 01:47 AM
  #2  
Hurdigurdiman's Avatar
Hurdigurdiman
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 3,079
Likes: 25
From: Ephrata, PA, USA now. Originally from the UK
Default

Hey others may say differently but I just did my rear rotors due to an inspection failure and have been pricing up and deciding before doing the job myself. I settled for the same rotors Sebro (with advice from several posters) and I think you made a good choice. Ceramic pads are supposed to be the best from what I read. Brake dust?,,,,,,, I can't say anything about that. Dust can be washed off and all pads must loose particles of dust as they wear. There are 4 great videos on this page if you are doing the job yourself. https://rennlist.com/forums/996-foru...-tutorial.html
I changed my back pads about a year back so they didn't need changing. However I needed to take the car out on a braking run to break the old pads into the new rotors. They work just fine now and the car stops on a dime as usual again.

Last edited by Hurdigurdiman; 10-05-2013 at 02:14 PM.
Old 10-06-2013 | 03:02 AM
  #3  
white out's Avatar
white out
Three Wheelin'
 
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 1,392
Likes: 5
From: San Diego
Default

Hawk HPS is a great pad. Easy on rotors, low dust, quiet, very good at fade resistance. I use them on all my cars and just put a set on my girlfriend's VW.

Last edited by white out; 10-07-2013 at 03:29 AM.
Old 10-06-2013 | 09:25 PM
  #4  
targa996's Avatar
targa996
Pro
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 737
Likes: 3
From: Silicon Valley
Default

I looked at ceramic pads versus metallic versus carbon last year for my bmw. Quick summary .. Metallic is cheapest , bites well from cold , makes black dust , perf drops off at high temp ( like on track) . Ceramic needs to warm up a bit to bite, lighter color dust so does not stick/show as much, wears longer and easier on the rotors in light use, performs better at temperature, low noise. Carbon works best at high temp .. Good for track, potentially noisy, most expensive, does not bite as well cold.

I used pagid/textar standard metallic pads (same as Porsche oem). Dust doesn't bother me and I'm not hard on the brakes. Ok for light track use. I put akebono ceramics on front of BMW.. Light dust, works well, quiet, but you can notice longer to bite on first couple of stops from cold. I'd only go with carbon if it was primarily track car and driven hard ...
Old 10-06-2013 | 10:19 PM
  #5  
5CHN3LL's Avatar
5CHN3LL
Race Director
 
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 10,422
Likes: 214
From: SOcialist republic of CALifornia
Default

After a day of mountain driving, I'd advise you to avoid the carbon pads unless you REALLY need the extra bite. My ears are still ringing.



Quick Reply: 2002 996 c4 - Brake pads & Rotors



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 01:07 AM.