Notices
996 Forum 1999-2005
Sponsored by:

making rear wing fixed in up position

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-16-2012, 10:42 PM
  #61  
KrazyK
Drifting
 
KrazyK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Texas
Posts: 3,217
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 12 Posts
Default

I hate to say it but that would really be ashame. It just wont be a Porsche anymore.
Old 12-16-2012, 11:56 PM
  #62  
white out
Three Wheelin'
Thread Starter
 
white out's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: San Diego
Posts: 1,392
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

why? because the engine would no longer be a pile of **** AND it would make power on par with 996T...
Old 12-17-2012, 12:23 AM
  #63  
white out
Three Wheelin'
Thread Starter
 
white out's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: San Diego
Posts: 1,392
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Update on the rear wing:

I removed the cables which hold the wing up and used bolts to hold the wing in the up position. If the bolts are removed, the wing will slide down into the lowered position. This dropped a few pounds (3-5) from the trunk lid.



Old 12-17-2012, 03:46 AM
  #64  
DreamCarrera
Drifting
 
DreamCarrera's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: A twisty backroad in PA
Posts: 2,115
Received 128 Likes on 80 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by white out
why? because the engine would no longer be a pile of **** AND it would make power on par with 996T...


I read this entire thread and was actually in your corner up until the "pile of ****" comment...I do find it very funny that you may not know that many chebby LSs grenade...HAHA...Gooood luuuck!!!
Old 12-17-2012, 09:50 AM
  #65  
white out
Three Wheelin'
Thread Starter
 
white out's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: San Diego
Posts: 1,392
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by DreamCarrera


I read this entire thread and was actually in your corner up until the "pile of ****" comment...I do find it very funny that you may not know that many chebby LSs grenade...HAHA...Gooood luuuck!!!
You can't seriously tell yourself that the LS1 has anywhere near the amount of mechanical failures as the 3.4 M96 in 100% stock form (IMS bearings, oval pistons, cracked cylinder heads, leaking spark plug boots, AOS failure, cracked blocks).

The 3.4M96 is a joke of an engine; in reliability and ability to make power.
Old 12-17-2012, 10:19 AM
  #66  
KrazyK
Drifting
 
KrazyK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Texas
Posts: 3,217
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 12 Posts
Default

White Out, your beginning to sound like your not a Porsche fan. Why the heck did you buy one?
Old 12-17-2012, 10:32 AM
  #67  
white out
Three Wheelin'
Thread Starter
 
white out's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: San Diego
Posts: 1,392
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

I'm definitely not the only Porsche fan who isn't a fan of the 3.4M96.

I bought it as a cheap daily driver and did the engine swap to make the car reliable, cheap maintenance, and add some power.
Old 12-17-2012, 11:35 AM
  #68  
KrazyK
Drifting
 
KrazyK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Texas
Posts: 3,217
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 12 Posts
Default

Just think what you could have done to a 3.4 for the same money. Jake R. engine for example. you dont think they can make the 3.4 Reliable? Now your gonna have a mismatched hybrid? What the ?????
Old 12-17-2012, 12:16 PM
  #69  
Capt. Obvious
Rennlist Member
 
Capt. Obvious's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Gig Harbor, WA
Posts: 3,943
Received 1,471 Likes on 810 Posts
Default

This LSX swap will cost about 1/4th of having the 3.4 built for power.

It's just a car.
Old 12-17-2012, 01:33 PM
  #70  
white out
Three Wheelin'
Thread Starter
 
white out's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: San Diego
Posts: 1,392
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by KrazyK
Just think what you could have done to a 3.4 for the same money. Jake R. engine for example. you dont think they can make the 3.4 Reliable? Now your gonna have a mismatched hybrid? What the ?????
A mismatched hybrid, WTF is that?

You're off your rocker if you think that a 3.4 will ever be able to compete with an LS1. M96 is good for making coffee tables, not reliable power.

FYI, my car had a working M96 with new RMS, upgraded IMS bearing; Fabspeed exhaust; and Fabspeed intake.


This:



Looks better than this:
Old 12-17-2012, 01:40 PM
  #71  
KrazyK
Drifting
 
KrazyK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Texas
Posts: 3,217
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 12 Posts
Default

IMHO, an engine swap, hybrid conversion is more suited to an old Jeep or something. The second picture keeps the car a Porsche. Personally, I dont get it. why mess up a good car?

"Hybrid" is Renegades description. Not mine.


This LSX swap will cost about 1/4th of having the 3.4 built for power.

It's just a car.
Even if your cost estimate was true (which its not), with the 3.4 it would still be a Porsche.
Old 12-17-2012, 02:17 PM
  #72  
bordin34
Pro
 
bordin34's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Urbana ,MD
Posts: 550
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

You've probably seen this thread before since you are doing the conversion. If you haven't check it out it has some great info in it.
http://ls1tech.com/forums/conversion...onversion.html
Old 12-17-2012, 03:12 PM
  #73  
white out
Three Wheelin'
Thread Starter
 
white out's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: San Diego
Posts: 1,392
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by KrazyK
IMHO, an engine swap, hybrid conversion is more suited to an old Jeep or something. The second picture keeps the car a Porsche. Personally, I dont get it. why mess up a good car?

"Hybrid" is Renegades description. Not mine.

Even if your cost estimate was true (which its not), with the 3.4 it would still be a Porsche.
How does adding horsepower/torque and lowering reliability issues mess up a good car? I don't get it?

My total cost for the swap. . . How about you post up the cost of the 3.4 build, install, etc and I'll post up my costs.

Originally Posted by bordin34
You've probably seen this thread before since you are doing the conversion. If you haven't check it out it has some great info in it.
http://ls1tech.com/forums/conversion...onversion.html
I've spoken with him a few times regarding some aspects of the build.
Old 12-17-2012, 10:58 PM
  #74  
KrazyK
Drifting
 
KrazyK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Texas
Posts: 3,217
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 12 Posts
Default

I dont know if the Chevy is anymore reliable than a propery built 3.4 but like everyone said, its your car. JR is able to get "reliable power" out of an M96 engine.

Im sure yours will be unique because you dont see many. No offense by "Hybrid". Thats a Renegade term. Best of luck.
Old 12-18-2012, 12:05 AM
  #75  
white out
Three Wheelin'
Thread Starter
 
white out's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: San Diego
Posts: 1,392
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Their business name is Renegade Hybrids, nowhere else does it call the car a hybrid. They do use the term "conversion" often though. Nowhere does it say "mismatched hybrid" as you referred to the swap. If it makes you feel better, we can refer to it as the bastard build. I'm cool with that.

Continuing to think that the M96 can ever be as reliable as an LS1 (or any small block LSx) is unrealistic.. The LSx is one of the most reliable engines in existence; where the M96 has a stigma worse than the Corvair.

As for power, the LS1 in my car will make around 320rwhp/340rwtq as it sits. If I went with a simple cam/valve spring/pushrod upgrade, 400whp isn't far away; longtube headers are $180 on eBay (another 20whp/tq). In case you're not good with math, that's about 70whp/150wtq over the M96 before mods. And all for less money than upgrading an IMS bearing if the M96 isn't blown up.


Quick Reply: making rear wing fixed in up position



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 08:29 AM.