Notices
996 Forum 1999-2005
Sponsored by:

To 4S or not to 4S :)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-13-2012, 12:14 PM
  #1  
desmo907
AutoX
Thread Starter
 
desmo907's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: CT
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default To 4S or not to 4S :)

Considering a few different 1999-2004 (996) car (cab or sunroof) and have driven a 4S (short drive).

Wonder to value of 4S over only 2 wheel drive. I will not be driving in snow...
And also wonder if 4s adds more worries for repairs...

Curious for opinion and/or pointers to other threads...
Thx
Old 09-13-2012, 12:16 PM
  #2  
dotframe
Pro
 
dotframe's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Austin,Tx
Posts: 726
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Default

Its all personal preference. I absolutely love my 4S and am very glad I went with it.
Old 09-13-2012, 01:20 PM
  #3  
Dennis C
Rocky Mountain High
Rennlist Member
 
Dennis C's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Colorado
Posts: 17,569
Received 1,536 Likes on 960 Posts
Default

I love my 4S too and I'm happy I bought it. I'd do it again.

There are pros and cons. Most people (me included) believe it is the best looking variant of the 996 ever produced. It has the wide hips of the turbo, but not the air intakes or the rear spoiler. It preserves the 911 lines better. It's nicely equipped, has upgraded suspension and brakes, etc. On the other side of that coin, it's heavier than a C2 and not quite as quick. It handles a little bit differently. It does have more parts to break, although not much more than a C2.

Ultimately you have to decide what you're looking for in a Porsche. If you plan to track it frequently, you'll probably prefer a C2 or even a GT3. If it's going to be used on the street more, then go with your heart. If you like the look of the C4S, it won't disappoint you.

Last edited by Dennis C; 09-13-2012 at 06:17 PM.
Old 09-13-2012, 01:28 PM
  #4  
SacTownGuy
Racer
 
SacTownGuy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Sacramento, Cali
Posts: 372
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I think the back end on the 4s is well worth the extra money.
Old 09-13-2012, 01:31 PM
  #5  
desmo907
AutoX
Thread Starter
 
desmo907's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: CT
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Thanks... I had not seen the 2wd yet... nor compared them side by side.
I did like the 4S looks... even seemed have body works along the lower sides ..
Old 09-13-2012, 01:54 PM
  #6  
Tuorbillon
Intermediate
 
Tuorbillon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: North Royalton, Ohio
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

S4 is a sexy looking car. I prefer the look of coupe. I'v been looking around and it's lot more expensive than 2WD cars. Some are almost as much as the turbo. It will be little slower due to extra weight.
Old 09-13-2012, 02:24 PM
  #7  
desmo907
AutoX
Thread Starter
 
desmo907's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: CT
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Notice differences in front fairing for 4S across the 996 years. The 2004 I see has more "fins" in front air dams (unless it was an option or add-on). Nor sure I notice much difference from rear...
Old 09-13-2012, 02:38 PM
  #8  
halik
Three Wheelin'
 
halik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Chicago IL
Posts: 1,369
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

AWD, turbo brakes and suspension and generally better optioned than an average narrow body. Tough to beat. Agreed on the cleaner lines without the spoiler.

Also you can get a ton of oem turbo parts for cheap (when people upgrade). I got a 10K mile set of shocks for $250.
Old 09-13-2012, 02:40 PM
  #9  
otto06
Instructor
 
otto06's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: California
Posts: 184
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I love my 4S. The wide a$$ is just sexy and I drive the canyons almost every weekend - the brakes are well worth it. I wasn't sure of the AWD - I prefer RWD cars but I own an '84 Carrera too - so I can get my fix that way.
Old 09-13-2012, 05:39 PM
  #10  
silotwo
Banned
 
silotwo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 770
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

The 4S is a great ride in my opinion, I originally purchased for the looks and the AWD thinking winter since I drive them year round. Didn't expect a much of a functional difference between the 4S and the C2, but the 4S has really grown on me.

In my opinion the 4S is a tad more on the luxury side, great cruiser, great handling, not as quick as the C2 but wind her up and there is plenty of go juice.

The C2 feels a tad quicker and sportier, I notice I tend to drive somewhat more aggressively in the C2 than the 4S.

Trunk space is a downer on the 4S.

I suggest you drive them both, perhaps a few different cars of each, and the right car will most likely find you.

Happy shopping, there can be a lot of fun in the hunt.
Old 09-13-2012, 06:05 PM
  #11  
Mil Mascaras
Advanced
 
Mil Mascaras's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Dallas, Texas 75201
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I have a 4s as well and previously had a Cab Carerra as well. I prefer the looks and ride of the 4s over the regular 996, not to mention the wide back side.
Old 09-13-2012, 07:58 PM
  #12  
Heima996C4S
Advanced
 
Heima996C4S's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: San Diego Ca.
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

IMHO the 996 C4S has one of the best asses Porsche has ever offered... Love my 2004 C4S.
Old 09-13-2012, 08:41 PM
  #13  
yoda888
Racer
 
yoda888's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 327
Received 14 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

What are you buying the car for? Weekend cruiser? Track car? etc..

I had the same dilemma as you!

I originally without a doubt was going to get a 4s! Just love the look of the widebody! However for my purposes and reading the forums, I found a 40th Anniversary to meet my needs better.

My purpose for this car is:
3rd car
random weekend cruiser
HPDE car

The 40th Anniversary fit my needs better because:
x51 motor package (more power!!!!)
LSD (no other 996 has LSD except for GT2/3 I believe)
2wd (vs. 4wd for track and potentially less parts to break)
Bonus: nicer interior than a standard 996

All in all, exactly what someone would want for the track.

What kept me going back and forth between the 4s and the 40th was the widebody! I love that widebody look!

In the end, I got the 40th, because I gave up form for function. But I don't think you can go wrong with the 4s!

Originally Posted by desmo907
Considering a few different 1999-2004 (996) car (cab or sunroof) and have driven a 4S (short drive).

Wonder to value of 4S over only 2 wheel drive. I will not be driving in snow...
And also wonder if 4s adds more worries for repairs...

Curious for opinion and/or pointers to other threads...
Thx
Old 09-13-2012, 08:48 PM
  #14  
Tim Wasmer
Race Car
 
Tim Wasmer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Denver Colorado
Posts: 4,400
Received 46 Likes on 32 Posts
Default

I have a 03 C4. Have had 3 C4S's. Would buy one again Just was not in the budget this time
Old 09-14-2012, 12:24 AM
  #15  
spender
Pro
 
spender's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Calgary, Canada
Posts: 527
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I have a 4S, so I am biased - but do your research and you'll find that the C4S is widely considered to be one of the classic models (by Porsche standards) in the 996 line. Excellence (Porsche magazine) currently has their buyer's guide out, and they rave about the C4S.


Quick Reply: To 4S or not to 4S :)



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 03:01 AM.