Notices
996 Forum 1999-2005
Sponsored by:

"N" rated sidwall tires?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-05-2012, 11:36 PM
  #1  
tedfromohio
Instructor
Thread Starter
 
tedfromohio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Ohio
Posts: 198
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default "N" rated sidwall tires?

Am looking for new 18" tires for my 996 and am wondering if the "N" rating is still a requirement. Have been considering the Michelin Pilot Sport A/S but they don't seem to be "N" rated. Neither do the Conti's which last summer seemed to be a Rennlist favorite - am I missing something?

Any other recommendations I should be thinking about?

Thanks!

Ted
Old 02-05-2012, 11:47 PM
  #2  
Dennis C
Rocky Mountain High
Rennlist Member
 
Dennis C's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Colorado
Posts: 17,426
Received 1,445 Likes on 901 Posts
Default

Your 996 is well beyond the factory warranty, so the N rating doesn't really matter. N spec tires are the ones that Porsche tested with your car and they live up to the Porsche performance standards. That doesn't mean that non N-spec tires won't live up to that standard, they simply haven't been tested by Porsche. I've heard great things about the Michelin Super Sports, and they aren't N rated...
Old 02-05-2012, 11:52 PM
  #3  
street rod
Drifting
 
street rod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: DFW
Posts: 2,270
Received 250 Likes on 172 Posts
Default

I am on my second set of Pilot Sport A/S on my A3. Very nice tires. Way better than my previous Pirellis.
Old 02-06-2012, 12:18 AM
  #4  
SLVRBLT
Intermediate
 
SLVRBLT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Trackside, USA
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I recently replaced my Pirelli hoops with Conti Extreme Contact D/W. I put a pretty detailed review on tire rack about them. They have a 280 treadwear rating vice the 220/240 of nearly every other brand available. Traction rating of A which is also on par with the Michelin and Pirelli and the others.

I have put nearly 6k miles on them and have driven in warm, cold and wet conditions with no traction issues and they look like new. They also warm up pretty quickly. The car handles great with them and the ride quality has definitely improved. On the Pirelli's pretty much anything below 60 dg I could throw it sideways at will. Although it was tons of fun, it could get ugly fast. And in the rain, just plain scary

For the money I don't think they can be beat. I will be installing another set when they are worn out.

Interested in hearing what others have to say.
Old 02-06-2012, 12:23 AM
  #5  
dotframe
Pro
 
dotframe's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Austin,Tx
Posts: 726
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Default

Sumitomo HTR ZIII here and I couldn't be happier!! Don't think they are rated N though.
Old 02-06-2012, 12:26 AM
  #6  
fpb111
Rennlist Member
 
fpb111's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Northern NJ
Posts: 5,539
Received 95 Likes on 71 Posts
Default

Both the
Hankook Ventus K110 $844 set (4)
And the
Sumitomo HTR Z 111 $598 set (4)
Have been good tires for the $$, especially if you don't use them for track events.
Old 02-06-2012, 01:06 AM
  #7  
SSST
Drifting
 
SSST's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Bastrop By God Texas
Posts: 2,255
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

The N-spec has to do with the weight rating on the tire. Since the motor is in the back, that is where all the weight is as opposed to a normal car with the weight in the front.

N-spec tires are engineered to take the extra weight in the rear. As long as the weight rating on the rear tires exceeds the rear axel weight, you will be safe. Performance may be affected though as Nspec tires rear tires have stiffer sidewalls.

BTW. I have the Hankooks which are N-rated. I like them as well as the Pilot Sports that came on the car, and they are half the price.
Old 02-06-2012, 09:39 AM
  #8  
rpm's S2
Drifting
 
rpm's S2's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Apex, NC
Posts: 2,632
Received 15 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SSST
The N-spec has to do with the weight rating on the tire. Since the motor is in the back, that is where all the weight is as opposed to a normal car with the weight in the front.

N-spec tires are engineered to take the extra weight in the rear. As long as the weight rating on the rear tires exceeds the rear axel weight, you will be safe. Performance may be affected though as Nspec tires rear tires have stiffer sidewalls.

BTW. I have the Hankooks which are N-rated. I like them as well as the Pilot Sports that came on the car, and they are half the price.
Exactly. N-rating is more than just bs marketing.
Old 02-06-2012, 10:07 AM
  #9  
Dennis C
Rocky Mountain High
Rennlist Member
 
Dennis C's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Colorado
Posts: 17,426
Received 1,445 Likes on 901 Posts
Default

When did the Hankooks become N rated? They aren't listed on the most recent Porsche bulletin for approved tires...
Old 02-06-2012, 10:16 AM
  #10  
soverystout
Three Wheelin'
 
soverystout's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Downingtown, PA
Posts: 1,553
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SSST
The N-spec has to do with the weight rating on the tire. Since the motor is in the back, that is where all the weight is as opposed to a normal car with the weight in the front.

N-spec tires are engineered to take the extra weight in the rear. As long as the weight rating on the rear tires exceeds the rear axel weight, you will be safe. Performance may be affected though as Nspec tires rear tires have stiffer sidewalls.

BTW. I have the Hankooks which are N-rated. I like them as well as the Pilot Sports that came on the car, and they are half the price.
Uh, I have the Hankooks, they are not N-rated.
Old 02-06-2012, 10:32 AM
  #11  
Zookie
Nordschleife Master
 
Zookie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Toronto, Dubai, Kuwait & Bombay
Posts: 6,978
Received 86 Likes on 65 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by soverystout
Uh, I have the Hankooks, they are not N-rated.
not for the 911 but maybe the Cayanne
Old 02-06-2012, 10:43 AM
  #12  
soverystout
Three Wheelin'
 
soverystout's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Downingtown, PA
Posts: 1,553
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Zookie
not for the 911 but maybe the Cayanne
Nope. Not for the Cayenne either
Old 02-06-2012, 10:46 AM
  #13  
SSST
Drifting
 
SSST's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Bastrop By God Texas
Posts: 2,255
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

My bad. I guess technically the Hankooks aren't N spec, but they have the same rear load rating and a sloghtly higher front load rating as the N spec PS2.

Back to my OP just be sure to check the load ratings if going with tires not designated as N-spec
Old 02-06-2012, 12:33 PM
  #14  
cardsrule
Pro
 
cardsrule's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Phoenix AZ
Posts: 526
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SSST
The N-spec has to do with the weight rating on the tire. Since the motor is in the back, that is where all the weight is as opposed to a normal car with the weight in the front.

N-spec tires are engineered to take the extra weight in the rear. As long as the weight rating on the rear tires exceeds the rear axel weight, you will be safe. Performance may be affected though as Nspec tires rear tires have stiffer sidewalls.

BTW. I have the Hankooks which are N-rated. I like them as well as the Pilot Sports that came on the car, and they are half the price.
Where did you here that?
Old 02-06-2012, 12:58 PM
  #15  
SSST
Drifting
 
SSST's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Bastrop By God Texas
Posts: 2,255
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by cardsrule
Where did you here that?
I think I read it in the Essential 996 Companion. I can't be sure though.

You can probably Google it and find something.


Quick Reply: "N" rated sidwall tires?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 09:50 AM.