Notices
996 Forum 1999-2005
Sponsored by:

2003 rebuilt engine, good or bad?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-10-2012, 01:34 PM
  #16  
dan212
Rennlist Member
 
dan212's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: NYC
Posts: 1,647
Received 121 Likes on 87 Posts
Default

If the engine was rebuilt by Porsche - or even a quality dealer, it will be logged. Just do a CarFAX on the VIN if your own dealer can't tell you (and they should).

I'd run from a strange car that had major work that was unlogged.

i'd check that the rebuild was actually done though. The engine bay may have been steam cleaned. If the whole car looks immaculate, you have a well cared for car, if the engine bay was singled out for cleaning, they may be cleaning up leaks and thats a caution..

But start by doing a CarFAX..
Old 01-10-2012, 02:30 PM
  #17  
washington dc porsche
Drifting
 
washington dc porsche's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Prince George's County, MD
Posts: 2,481
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

The Service Advisor at Porsche or Carmax?

Also, it seems the question should be "should I buy a car that "looks" like its engine has been rebuilt" because at this point the dealer "claims" they don't even know, which is odd in itself.

Originally Posted by Hermdog
When the serve advisor pulled up the car on the computer, he said that there was no information on the vehicle. He could not explain why and said it was strange and had never seen that before.
Old 01-10-2012, 02:54 PM
  #18  
Hermdog
Track Day
Thread Starter
 
Hermdog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

WP0CA29943S653530 is the vehicle vin. I am getting the car back this afternoon and will post the engine vin.
Old 01-10-2012, 03:33 PM
  #19  
Topaz330ci
Burning Brakes
 
Topaz330ci's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Posts: 1,073
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Reman engine installed by Porsche is a good thing!
Old 01-10-2012, 03:42 PM
  #20  
kromdom
Drifting
 
kromdom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: SoCal
Posts: 2,242
Received 16 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Hermdog
WP0CA29943S653530 is the vehicle vin.
Register @ Renntech and then use this: http://www.renntech.org/forums/content/vin_decoder/ (will not tell you much though).
If the reman engine has been serviced anywhere by any Porsche dealer, then I am guessing running the "NEW" VIN should at least show something

Curious why/what made you take the car to a Porsche dealer AFTER you bought the car?

Originally Posted by Porsche87
I guess in your case PPI would mean Post Purchase Inspection.
Sad but true.

OP: Water under the bridge now (hopefully lesson learned for the future) but best to research/ask/inquire/investigate/consult, etc. BEFORE buying anything. Probably could have spared yourself the apprehension. And not dampen your ownership experience. Best of luck.

P.S. Better late than never:
https://rennlist.com/forums/996-foru...ing-guide.html

https://rennlist.com/forums/911-foru...immermann.html

Last edited by kromdom; 01-10-2012 at 05:55 PM.
Old 01-10-2012, 04:03 PM
  #21  
fpb111
Rennlist Member
 
fpb111's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Northern NJ
Posts: 5,539
Received 95 Likes on 71 Posts
Default

http://www.autocheck.com/consumers/g...&WT.mc_id=5001

$$ to get report
AutoCheck found 13 records for this 2003 Porsche 911 Carrera / Carrera 4!
VIN:WP0CA29943S653530
Engine:3.6L H6 MPI
Style / Body:Cabriolet 2D
Country of Assembly:Germany
Old 01-10-2012, 04:31 PM
  #22  
Hermdog
Track Day
Thread Starter
 
Hermdog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Kromdom, Carmax has a 5 day return policy. I can return the car for any reason within 5 days of purchase. I am within those 5 days. I would not have purchased the vehicle had it not been for that stipulation. This entire thread is in light of determining whether I should keep the car. Fpb...is the autocheck different than a carfax. The carfax comes up totally clean.
Old 01-10-2012, 05:55 PM
  #23  
Hermdog
Track Day
Thread Starter
 
Hermdog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Just got the engine vin logray: M96/03AT66568624

Dealer says its mechanically perfect and no bodywork. The only problem is that the top was neglected and needs replacement. Its cosmetic if I can live with the looks of it...
Old 01-10-2012, 06:27 PM
  #24  
logray
Three Wheelin'
 
logray's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Nor Cal
Posts: 1,851
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

M96/03 = 3.6L

AT = re-manufactured

665 = 2005 year engine

68624 = sequence number

This is a rebuilt engine from 2005. It might have the larger 22mm unservicable IMS bearing (without complete engine teardown) which is stronger than the original single row bearing and about as strong as the original dual row bearing from 1999 and 2000 cars.

So pretty much the 2003 car has an rebuilt engine from 2005, when it was put in would be dictated by service records.
Old 01-10-2012, 06:58 PM
  #25  
dennis hiip
Rennlist Member
 
dennis hiip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 248
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I've read that factory rebuilds come complete with all the new goodies: AC, alt. water pump, coils, starter. etc. I think you scored. Install the IMS Guardian if IMS not serviceable and enjoy.
Old 01-10-2012, 08:11 PM
  #26  
Hermdog
Track Day
Thread Starter
 
Hermdog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

You guys have been great! Thanks a bunch for all the help. Like I said, the car drives fantastic and the engine sounds like new. Can I ask what was the problem with the non-servicable IMS issue is? Is there any way to find out if it has the problematic bearing? Also, the top is going to need replacing. The fabric is pretty worn and although it closes and seals, the fabric does not totally sit in the door groves. How much is it to replace a top? I can do the top later...
Old 01-10-2012, 08:22 PM
  #27  
logray
Three Wheelin'
 
logray's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Nor Cal
Posts: 1,851
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

In looking at that sequence number it's a pretty good bet that the engine has the larger bearing.

All cars have a "problematic bearing", so to speak, it's a supposed design flaw with this engine. Yours happens to have one that is pretty strong, stronger than most (except for 1999-2000 MY) but not as strong as the LNE retrofit ceramic hybrid.

But the experts say that only 10% of cars will be affected in 90,000 miles. Plenty of cars on the road beyond that with their original bearings.

The only issue with that larger bearing is it can't be replaced without tearing the engine completely apart.

Which some say is not a problem, but the experts say this bearing is a service wear item and should be replaced or at least inspected every 40-60k miles.

edit: I want to say that a new top was like $1-2k range, unless someone else replies before me I'll get more detail later.
Old 01-10-2012, 08:38 PM
  #28  
Hermdog
Track Day
Thread Starter
 
Hermdog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The car has 35k miles on it and I would bet that I am not going to have it past 90k so I am not going to worry about it unless you suggest putting in the 'guardian'.

I just called my local porsche garage about the top. They quoted me 1550 for a new top. Damn dealer quoted me at 3700. Unbelievable.

Because of your help, I feel much better about keeping the ride!
Old 01-10-2012, 09:12 PM
  #29  
logray
Three Wheelin'
 
logray's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Nor Cal
Posts: 1,851
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Stealers do compete if you shop around, and typically DIY is even less.

As for the IMS guardian, I personally think the idea is awesome. For $400 you can have some serious peace of mind. Not just for the bearing, but also for the rest of the internal ferro-magnetic engine components.

This is stuff used in helicopters and airplanes, not cars... so it's pretty far ahead of it's time in that respect.

Also a correction on my earlier post, the engine was made in 2005, and it was later re-manned. However from that data it's not possible to tell when (after 2005) it was remanned. That data is in some internal Porsche database. In any case, most people regard a re-manned engine as a good thing and has many benefits as has been pointed out, even if it has an unserviceable bearing.

ENJOY THE RIDE!
Old 01-10-2012, 09:19 PM
  #30  
kromdom
Drifting
 
kromdom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: SoCal
Posts: 2,242
Received 16 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

As others have already pointed out, the reman engine turned out to be an unexpected bonus for you.

Instead of a new softtop, consider a hardtop for now (used ones in great shape for around $500). Or try the salvage yards for used softops.
NOTE: car below is NOT mine but I do have a removable hardtop for car



Quick Reply: 2003 rebuilt engine, good or bad?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 09:18 PM.