'04 Carrera base: How much confidence should I have in a straight shot
#17
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Sounds like you need a GT2RS.
Better yet, register for a DE and enjoy what the car does best. I think you will like the sensation of hard cornering, braking AND accelerating better than only one of the 3.
Better yet, register for a DE and enjoy what the car does best. I think you will like the sensation of hard cornering, braking AND accelerating better than only one of the 3.
#18
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
This is not to say I'm not happy with the Carrera. When considering what to purchase, the other bigger engined cars had drawbacks that drove me to the Carrera.
1. Mileage. The gas mileage on the 3.6L 6cyl isn't great (compared to a 4 cyl) but it has to be a lot worse in a V8 or V10.
2. Configuration. The rear engine feels a lot better, like it's pushing you forward rather than the front engine/rwd configuration that feels like the drivetrain is having to push its' own engine in the front (hard to articulate)
3. Handling. Rarely does the opportunity to race surface. More frequently I enjoy the fact that I almost never brake when going into a turn, even at 90 degrees
4. Appearance. I prefer the 911 look and so do the ladies. Although I've been extremely disappointed ever since Porsche emasculated the 911 by offering that measly pop-up spoiler in lieu of the classic whale tail
1. Mileage. The gas mileage on the 3.6L 6cyl isn't great (compared to a 4 cyl) but it has to be a lot worse in a V8 or V10.
2. Configuration. The rear engine feels a lot better, like it's pushing you forward rather than the front engine/rwd configuration that feels like the drivetrain is having to push its' own engine in the front (hard to articulate)
3. Handling. Rarely does the opportunity to race surface. More frequently I enjoy the fact that I almost never brake when going into a turn, even at 90 degrees
4. Appearance. I prefer the 911 look and so do the ladies. Although I've been extremely disappointed ever since Porsche emasculated the 911 by offering that measly pop-up spoiler in lieu of the classic whale tail
#20
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Did you happen to use the Google machine and type "0-60 times"? It's like magic.
![Name: Search.jpg
Views: 133
Size: 52.2 KB](https://rennlist.com/forums/attachments/996-forum/515367d1298575108-04-carrera-base-how-much-confidence-should-i-have-in-a-straight-shot-search.jpg)
Just sayin'
-td
#22
Burning Brakes
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Most races are not fought on the track or on winding roads. The most likely scenario is car A pulls alongside car B on an open stretch of road, they take off until one is clearly ahead. This is also done at stoplights when there is open road ahead.
The turbo is really the car to get. It has both the maneuvering that Porsche is known for along with enough acceleration that can compete with the big boys.
2300cc may be right in that I bought the wrong car. I should've held out (read saved up) for a turbo
The turbo is really the car to get. It has both the maneuvering that Porsche is known for along with enough acceleration that can compete with the big boys.
2300cc may be right in that I bought the wrong car. I should've held out (read saved up) for a turbo
#23
Racer
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 288
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Did you happen to use the Google machine and type "0-60 times"? It's like magic.
Attachment 515367
Just sayin'
-td
Attachment 515367
Just sayin'
-td
![bowdown](https://rennlist.com/forums/graemlins/bowdown.gif)
#24
Racer
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 288
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#25
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I just think it's interesting. Most well tuned motors have comparable fuel mileage if they're making the same power. I imagine a Corvette driven at part throttle to make only 320hp would get far better fuel mileage than a 996 at full throttle. This is probably why the Corvette gets incredible mileage on the highway if you can keep from getting on it, the car's barely idling at 70-80mph in 6th. I think I've seen as high as 35mpg on a long trip. I've never seen more than 28-39mpg in any 996. Oddly, the GT3 seems more fuel efficient than the C2 or the turbo...
#26
Racer
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 288
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I just think it's interesting. Most well tuned motors have comparable fuel mileage if they're making the same power. I imagine a Corvette driven at part throttle to make only 320hp would get far better fuel mileage than a 996 at full throttle. This is probably why the Corvette gets incredible mileage on the highway if you can keep from getting on it, the car's barely idling at 70-80mph in 6th. I think I've seen as high as 35mpg on a long trip. I've never seen more than 28-39mpg in any 996. Oddly, the GT3 seems more fuel efficient than the C2 or the turbo...
#27
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I just think it's interesting. Most well tuned motors have comparable fuel mileage if they're making the same power. I imagine a Corvette driven at part throttle to make only 320hp would get far better fuel mileage than a 996 at full throttle. This is probably why the Corvette gets incredible mileage on the highway if you can keep from getting on it, the car's barely idling at 70-80mph in 6th. I think I've seen as high as 35mpg on a long trip. I've never seen more than 28-39mpg in any 996. Oddly, the GT3 seems more fuel efficient than the C2 or the turbo...
-td
#28
Burning Brakes
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
The best I get with cruise set is 25 MPG. You want to talk about a PIG. The Viper. I did a drive with a few about a year ago. We stopped for gas TWICE. I never even filled during the entire trip.
#30
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
3. Handling. Rarely does the opportunity to race surface. More frequently I enjoy the fact that I almost never brake when going into a turn, even at 90 degrees
4. Appearance. I prefer the 911 look and so do the ladies. Although I've been extremely disappointed ever since Porsche emasculated the 911 by offering that measly pop-up spoiler in lieu of the classic whale tail
4. Appearance. I prefer the 911 look and so do the ladies. Although I've been extremely disappointed ever since Porsche emasculated the 911 by offering that measly pop-up spoiler in lieu of the classic whale tail
The "classic" whale tail is only classic on the Turbo; the original 930 was equipped as such to fit an intercooler and improve high-speed stability. Since you like both whale tail and bench racing, a newer Turbo has the look and bragging rights you seek. I, for one, prefer the truly classic 911 rear profile sans wing. You can always raise your spoiler and pull the fuse, or go for an aerokit if you want to keep it classy.
And those poor ladies, surely they regret choosing your 911 and you over the Vipers and Vettes, then getting back to your place and discovering your handle is "Mister Quickie."
![Stick Out Tongue](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/smilies/tongue.gif)