Notices
996 Forum 1999-2005
Sponsored by:

3.4L vs. 3.6L

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-13-2010, 11:54 AM
  #1  
fjr_wertheimber
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Smile 3.4L vs. 3.6L

What are anyone's thoughts on the early 3.4L cars, versus the later 3.6L cars? Worth the extra money for the 3.6L? Either one more durable than the other? Anything to watch out for in particular, one over the other?

Bearing in mind that I'm going into this expecting to do the LN IMS upgrade, RMS, water pump, the orange cap upgrade, the 3.6L exhaust hack/mod, magnetic oil drain plug, and LN spin-on oilfilter upgrade with filter magnet as soon as possible after getting the vehicle... anything else I should expect/plan on doing?

Oh, and anyone know of any good deals or looking to sell a 996 sometime around late Jan/early Feb next year? Should be getting back from Iraq around then... (so I'll finally be able to and drive a nice car again... although not at the same time, obviously... LOL )

Thanks in advance for the help/tips/info!
Old 10-13-2010, 12:00 PM
  #2  
papachili
Advanced
 
papachili's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Lakewood Ranch, Florida
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Spend the money to get the newest you can. You will end out with factory updates and owner updates that you wont have to perform yourself/pay for. I have a 2004 996 Aero (3.6L) with 75,000 and have never replaced a single thing other than oil and a clutch at 45k miles.

and...THANK YOU for your service!
Old 10-13-2010, 01:35 PM
  #3  
03911TT
Instructor
 
03911TT's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Orlando, Florida
Posts: 213
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Agree with poster above, buy the newest you can afford. I've been very pleased with the 3.6
Old 10-13-2010, 01:55 PM
  #4  
Barn996
Race Director
 
Barn996's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Kittery, Maine
Posts: 11,801
Received 14 Likes on 12 Posts
Default

There are still lots of 3.4s around (I own one) that are great cars, but if your budget allows, buy the newest one you can realistically afford (including upgrades as mentioned). I haven't driven a 3.6 so I can't advise you on that, but either 911 is a keeper in my book. Do a search on this forum for comparisons of the MK1 and the MK2s and you'll find plenty of good reading. Thanks for your service and stay in touch so we can follow your Porsche choice early next winter.
Old 10-13-2010, 02:10 PM
  #5  
oneyedjack
Advanced
 
oneyedjack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I would have to agree that the 3.6 is the better choice. I have driven several 3.4L and they always make me feel like I made the right choice. Nothing wrong with the 3.4 engines, they are fine cars. I just prefer my 3.6. I may be biased though my car has the X51 3.6L
Old 10-13-2010, 02:22 PM
  #6  
Todds911
Instructor
 
Todds911's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Philadelphia SW Suburbs
Posts: 220
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I agree. Get the 3.6 if you can.

I've owned a 99, which had no problems. I also have read to stay away from the 99 3.4's (there are no official stats, but many believe these were the most prone to grenading).

I think the market prices all this in accordingly. 99's are generally cheaper than 00's, all else equal, and MKI's are generally cheaper than MKII's - and IMO not just because of the age of the car.

You could also getting a 3.4 and then the IMS upgrade with the savings. Others have mentioned this. Although there are many other non-engine upgrades that go along with the 3.6s models.
Old 10-13-2010, 03:30 PM
  #7  
OZ951
Three Wheelin'
 
OZ951's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Sydney
Posts: 1,657
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

I have a 3.4 manual and a 3.6 Tip. I like driving the 6spd better, but am spending a fair bit of money on exhaust, and intake to recover some extra Hp which is already there on the 3.6. I have also gone with the IMS upgrade for piece of mind.
Old 10-13-2010, 03:50 PM
  #8  
Barry Lenoble
Instructor
 
Barry Lenoble's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Selden, NY
Posts: 131
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Hey,

What is your budget? If you have 30K to spend then get a newer car with the 3.6. If you have 20K I would recommend a really nice 3.4 over a later but more beat up 3.6. Take your time, there are lots of cars to choose from.

Barry
Old 10-13-2010, 09:27 PM
  #9  
jrgordonsenior
Nordschleife Master
 
jrgordonsenior's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Vacuuming Cal Speedway
Posts: 7,306
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

I beat up 3.6's including X51's all the time on the track with my little 3.4 (270 rwhp). It's basically stock with just a GIAC street flash and 3.8 manilfolds. Very torquey motors, I get out off the corners faster than them though the 3.6's pull me at the top end. The transmissions are beefier from 02' on....
Old 10-14-2010, 02:15 AM
  #10  
Ahmet
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Ahmet's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Cary NC
Posts: 3,523
Received 33 Likes on 25 Posts
Default

Correct me if I'm wrong but the 3.6 makes more power everywhere, and they also respond better to modifications... I personally have enjoyed my MK2 car, but the engine is hardly the only reason to go for a later car. That said if I were doing it over, I'd probably either go for MK2 or if that wasn't in the budget, find an LSD equipped 99 car.
Old 10-14-2010, 02:53 AM
  #11  
Pac996
Drifting
 
Pac996's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Aiea, HI
Posts: 2,919
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

3.4 vs 3.6 ?
If you get the 3.6 and then Schofield or Kaneohe I'll help you figure out if the 3.4 is better
Old 10-14-2010, 03:07 AM
  #12  
fjr_wertheimber
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

LOL @ Pac996... I actually almost got a slot at Schoefield last year... A buddy of mine dropped his retirement paperwork and got me slotted to replace him... Sweet job, totally sham, right on the beach... but then DA rejected his retirement paperwork, so the job went away... Oh, well...
Old 10-14-2010, 02:21 PM
  #13  
rwiii
Rennlist Member
 
rwiii's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 769
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

The reason to buy the 3.6 over the 3.4 is the drink holder. Duh.
Agree with the advice about buying the newest you can afford but I have a 99 that I bought almost two years ago with 60K. I now have 75k and have only bought a cab top actuator (or something like that). All the other work has been at my option so based on MY experience I wouldn't fear a '99 if that's what's in your budget. I also fashioned a drink holder solution.
Old 10-14-2010, 02:25 PM
  #14  
Marc Gelefsky
Super Moderator
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
Marc Gelefsky's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 1998
Location: Northern New Jersey
Posts: 16,142
Likes: 0
Received 23 Likes on 19 Posts
Default

The glovebox in the 3.6 adds 8 Horsepower
Old 10-14-2010, 05:45 PM
  #15  
fjr_wertheimber
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Originally Posted by Marc Gelefsky
The glovebox in the 3.6 adds 8 Horsepower
Yes, but that's only if you get the X51 glovebox or if you use the hack to connect it to the center console...


Quick Reply: 3.4L vs. 3.6L



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 01:58 AM.