Notices
996 Forum 1999-2005
Sponsored by:

Perspective on 996

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-20-2010, 11:27 AM
  #1  
nick49
Drifting
Thread Starter
 
nick49's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Out West
Posts: 2,006
Received 24 Likes on 16 Posts
Default Perspective on 996

Interesting take on the 996, from an article posted on the 997 forum.

http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/por...e-911-996-3-4/

Having owned a Boxster for over 8 years and a 996 for nearly 7, I can't step up and defend Porsche on this one. I will say, that I think the Boxster and 996 are great cars and in over 40 years of car ownership including many semi exotics, the 996 Cab was my favorite.
Old 08-20-2010, 11:36 AM
  #2  
Marc Gelefsky
Super Moderator
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
Marc Gelefsky's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 1998
Location: Northern New Jersey
Posts: 16,142
Likes: 0
Received 22 Likes on 18 Posts
Default

This comment was particularly inane...

If you had purchased two Porsches in a row — a 1998 Carrera 2S for $75,000 and a 1999 Carrera 2 for $75,000 — and put 50,000 miles on each, you would find that the 1998 car would command an easy $50K in PCA classifieds, but the 1999 would struggle to fetch $20K.

How to you compare value on a 1998 993 C2S, a pretty rare and desirable car with a plane jane 99 996?
pretty sure the 993's are not fetching as much $$ as they used to anyways but still.
Old 08-20-2010, 11:52 AM
  #3  
chsu74
Rennlist Member
 
chsu74's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: CT
Posts: 9,615
Received 312 Likes on 260 Posts
Default

First, I love my 996 aero.

However, from a consumer's perspective: Would you rather buy a car that Porsche was losing their shirt on with producing that particular car or one that made so much money where it allowed them to R&D new products?
Old 08-20-2010, 12:02 PM
  #4  
Divot
Much missed
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
Divot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: In my exclusive Cayenne
Posts: 18,023
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

I have to disagree with you here. I don't care if they make more money for R&D when I buy a product. I would rather see them lose their shirt, so I get a better value. The 996 is a better value, imho.
Old 08-20-2010, 12:08 PM
  #5  
frisbee91
Three Wheelin'
 
frisbee91's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Delaware, USA
Posts: 1,685
Likes: 0
Received 66 Likes on 50 Posts
Default

The author of that article seems particularly bitter. He must've got burned pretty bad on some repair down the line. Quite a rant, but it sure seems biased.
Old 08-20-2010, 12:11 PM
  #6  
LVDell
Nordschleife Master
 
LVDell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Tobacco Road, NC
Posts: 5,225
Likes: 0
Received 28 Likes on 23 Posts
Default

Ah for f@ck's sake, not this crap again. Another doomsday article on a small percentage of 9X6 owners have suffered what guys like this claim plague the line. And to compare a mass produced 996 with a total redesign to a small production 993 that was the 40 year evolution of perfecting the non water cooled outdated motor is just ignorant. If the 996 was produced in the same number the 993 was, we wouldn't be having this discussion.

Buy one or don't. If you are in the market, articles like this are your best friend. You can get so much for the money it's not even funny. The 996 is better than the 993 in every way (except current pricing).
Old 08-20-2010, 12:15 PM
  #7  
himself
Rennlist Member
 
himself's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 3,736
Received 37 Likes on 28 Posts
Default

Guys sounds like he complains about everything and the 996 was on his radar this time. Disregard it.

-td
Old 08-20-2010, 12:19 PM
  #8  
roadsession
Three Wheelin'
 
roadsession's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: MA -
Posts: 1,765
Received 21 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

I have to laugh when I read articles like this. It is an article written by a human - not based on FACT - but largely based upon his literary freedom to write his sentiments. And then people take them to be facts.

There are so many silly factual errors all lined up to make his case - that it would take longer than I have time to address.

Agree with 'himself' - disregard it. Drive your car and enjoy it. If you commiserate with him, then sell your car and be done with it, if you don't own a 996 yet and believe him, don't buy it.
Old 08-20-2010, 12:30 PM
  #9  
P7
Advanced
 
P7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I read this article yesterday along with all the comments from different people - I did not want to post it here as it got me really upset and did not want to upset other 996 owners. Even though I bought my 02 996 two months ago and was familiar with all the potential issues as I have been on this forum for a long time, I have to say that I got really upset after I read all this especially the part of cutting corners in production. I beleive articles like this will help tank the prices of 996s even more - oh well - that's life

My car is a cpo for 2 years and I will worry about it after that but for now, I am enjoying the unique driving experience
Old 08-20-2010, 12:45 PM
  #10  
mikey55
Intermediate
 
mikey55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Kansas
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I've been driving Porsches on and off since I got my first one in 1971, a 1959 356. I had four more in the 70s, including one 912. Then I took some time off for the family and last February got my 1999 996. Since I got it, after some initial maintenance, I have put 11K miles on it and not even burned a quart of oil. The car is solid, reliable, fast, a joy to drive and I don't regret getting it one whit.

This June I drove it to the west coast, from Kansas, with my Granddaughter with no difficulties, even after my brother took it out on the "Bay Road" for some cornering and sliding. In one more month, my wife and I will take it on another 6K trip.

The horror stories I read here are certainly not my experience.
Old 08-20-2010, 12:56 PM
  #11  
papachili
Advanced
 
papachili's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Lakewood Ranch, Florida
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I've purchased new a 1982 Targa, purchased new a 1991 C4...and just purchased a used 2004 996 (taking full advantage of current pricing) and its by far the best of the 3. Faster, more efficient, everything works...i purchased it with 65k miles and have added 5k in just 2 months with a few road trips. While some have truly had a bad experience with the 996...I think the real numbers are no where near as horrifying as presented. Bad news sells. I just read a post where 996 owners have heart problems every time they hear a noise...just knowing it must be the bearing failure finally happening to them. SAD...if and when my bearing fails, Ill have it fixed. In the mean time I am driving the SH!^ out of my new toy and IT is enjoying every minute of it as much as I am!!
Old 08-20-2010, 01:25 PM
  #12  
rpm's S2
Drifting
 
rpm's S2's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Apex, NC
Posts: 2,632
Received 15 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

While I generally like and read TTAC, the simple factual errors in this article really hurt its credibility... RMS leaks cause $15,000 engine replacements? And the author just ignores the fact that the 911 series has always had issues with reliability... remember stretching timing chains and exploding air boxes? What about the 3.6 motors in the 964 that Porsche decided did not need a main gasket?

Comparing any Porsche to more mass-market consumer vehicles is just not relevant. Sadly, the lease-happy financial programs of the 996 era pushed the car out of dealerships at a rate unseen in previous 911 models. A much high percentage were driven daily (the kind of mileage that kills sports cars), and subsequent owners just don't put the money in maintenance. This reality must also be a part of the 996 discussion.

As for Porsche quality - you have only to look at the rock solid reliability of the Cayenne series to see that these guys can build a car. But when asked to create an uncompromising high performance vehicle, one must make trade offs between reliablity and performance. The cutting edge is a dangerous place.
That said, many of the criticisms related to interior parts quality and commonality with the Boxster are true. Every buyer/owner just has to make their own calculation and move forward. I think the members of this forum have chosen wisely.
Old 08-20-2010, 01:38 PM
  #13  
Marc Gelefsky
Super Moderator
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
Marc Gelefsky's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 1998
Location: Northern New Jersey
Posts: 16,142
Likes: 0
Received 22 Likes on 18 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by rpm's S2

As for Porsche quality - you have only to look at the rock solid reliability of the Cayenne series to see that these guys can build a car..

Cayenne's most definitely have their issues as well.
But all cars do!
Old 08-20-2010, 01:46 PM
  #14  
Dennis C
Rocky Mountain High
Rennlist Member
 
Dennis C's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Colorado
Posts: 17,430
Received 1,447 Likes on 902 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Marc Gelefsky
Cayenne's most definitely have their issues as well.
But all cars do!
Yeah, the Cayenne guys would get a kick out of that...

I have found our 996 and our Cayenne to be some of the most reliable cars we have ever owned.
Old 08-20-2010, 02:09 PM
  #15  
redridge
Nordschleife Master
 
redridge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 7,446
Received 62 Likes on 49 Posts
Default

the author is way off.... must be that time of the month. Most of the people who hates the 996 never even drove one, let alone owns one.


Quick Reply: Perspective on 996



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 06:14 PM.