Convert the engine to non-egas?
#16
I'd think you'd want to score the DME that came with the updated motor to make everything as easy as possible. 99's don't have the MOST system so I don't know if you need a data net system or not on the 7.2 ver of software.
I know that there are a whole host of other sensors that the newer DME type reads which would have to be taken into account - more so if there is PSM involved and the orig chassis didn't have that option, (not may 99's do).
It maybe easy for a person like Jake to do this swap, but everything comes with a cost. I'm sure you could put an F1 engine in a 99 and there is always someone to say thats easy as well - so long as the bank draft clears of course...
I know that there are a whole host of other sensors that the newer DME type reads which would have to be taken into account - more so if there is PSM involved and the orig chassis didn't have that option, (not may 99's do).
It maybe easy for a person like Jake to do this swap, but everything comes with a cost. I'm sure you could put an F1 engine in a 99 and there is always someone to say thats easy as well - so long as the bank draft clears of course...
#17
So is it really that easy?
Just take the T/B and plenum off your '99 M96 and slap it onto a 2001/2002 ish 3.6L?
Going back to Doug's question, how does the 5.2.2 DME deal with VCam+, or does that engine swap it also include a new 7.2 DME (and immo, alarm, instrument, etc... ) ???
What about wiring harness/etc.
Just take the T/B and plenum off your '99 M96 and slap it onto a 2001/2002 ish 3.6L?
Going back to Doug's question, how does the 5.2.2 DME deal with VCam+, or does that engine swap it also include a new 7.2 DME (and immo, alarm, instrument, etc... ) ???
What about wiring harness/etc.
#18
non e-gas 3.4 DME = 5.2 - Vario Cam
e-gas 3.4 DME = 7.2 - Vario Cam
e-gas 3.6 DME = 7.8 - Vario Cam Plus and MOST bus.
The biggest difference between the 5.2 and the 7.2 DME's is the e-gas, both are set up for Vario Cam. So the swap between these is basically just the Throttle Body and the Plenum. Swapping for a 3.6 Vario Cam Plus engine is far more complex. It needs the 7.8 DME to control the Vario Cam Plus, and the 7.8 is a MOST bus system, not compatible with much of the wiring, the instruments, etc. etc. Also has no return fuel line.
So for the DIY crowd stick with 3.4 cable and e-gas.
e-gas 3.4 DME = 7.2 - Vario Cam
e-gas 3.6 DME = 7.8 - Vario Cam Plus and MOST bus.
The biggest difference between the 5.2 and the 7.2 DME's is the e-gas, both are set up for Vario Cam. So the swap between these is basically just the Throttle Body and the Plenum. Swapping for a 3.6 Vario Cam Plus engine is far more complex. It needs the 7.8 DME to control the Vario Cam Plus, and the 7.8 is a MOST bus system, not compatible with much of the wiring, the instruments, etc. etc. Also has no return fuel line.
So for the DIY crowd stick with 3.4 cable and e-gas.
#19
non e-gas 3.4 DME = 5.2 - Vario Cam
e-gas 3.4 DME = 7.2 - Vario Cam
e-gas 3.6 DME = 7.8 - Vario Cam Plus and MOST bus.
The biggest difference between the 5.2 and the 7.2 DME's is the e-gas, both are set up for Vario Cam. So the swap between these is basically just the Throttle Body and the Plenum. Swapping for a 3.6 Vario Cam Plus engine is far more complex. It needs the 7.8 DME to control the Vario Cam Plus, and the 7.8 is a MOST bus system, not compatible with much of the wiring, the instruments, etc. etc. Also has no return fuel line.
So for the DIY crowd stick with 3.4 cable and e-gas.
e-gas 3.4 DME = 7.2 - Vario Cam
e-gas 3.6 DME = 7.8 - Vario Cam Plus and MOST bus.
The biggest difference between the 5.2 and the 7.2 DME's is the e-gas, both are set up for Vario Cam. So the swap between these is basically just the Throttle Body and the Plenum. Swapping for a 3.6 Vario Cam Plus engine is far more complex. It needs the 7.8 DME to control the Vario Cam Plus, and the 7.8 is a MOST bus system, not compatible with much of the wiring, the instruments, etc. etc. Also has no return fuel line.
So for the DIY crowd stick with 3.4 cable and e-gas.
Thanks in advance.
Cheers,
TomF
#20
Reviving an old thread. I am considering putting in a lower mile 3.4 in my 2000 C4 Tip cab and am wondering if I need to get the exact same engine or if I can use a 3.4 from the same era, if I swap the ancillaries. My engine is at 125K and is getting a bit tired. I have found several non gas 99s for sale that might work. Also, does it make a difference whether the engine is a MT or Auto? Or a C4 or C2? Finding the exact same configuration might be a challenge.
Thanks in advance.
Cheers,
TomF
Thanks in advance.
Cheers,
TomF
If you say get an E-Gas engine then you have to convert it to non E-gas by moving the non E-Gas hardware from the original engine to the new engine.
What it would take to make an engine from a manual equipped car into one suitable for a Tip equipped car I'm not at all able to say. Maybe not much but you should know before you leap...
BTW, the Pelican parts site has a section on engine swapping. I haven't checked but you could to see if this is covered.
Oh, is the engine in your car really *tired*? 125K miles is not that many miles and sometimes the tiredness of the engine is more in the mind of the owner than real.
#21
Macster,
Thanks for your comments. My car developed an intermix issue a couple of years ago and has been sitting (flushed and drained) ever since. Family, work and a major house remodel have gotten in the way.
I suspect it is the usual head cracking issue that the 2000s were prone to. I have a spare set of heads, so I can either go the route of replacing one or both the heads, or do an engine refresh or rebuild. Alternatively, I can "drop" in a used engine. Next week, I am going to take it down to a reputable indy the has replaced just one head for a friend on his 3.4, solving the intermix issue. If it turns out to be a reasonable cost to remedy, I will probably go that route as the engine was really tight and trouble-free before the intermix issue.
Cheers,
TomF
Thanks for your comments. My car developed an intermix issue a couple of years ago and has been sitting (flushed and drained) ever since. Family, work and a major house remodel have gotten in the way.
I suspect it is the usual head cracking issue that the 2000s were prone to. I have a spare set of heads, so I can either go the route of replacing one or both the heads, or do an engine refresh or rebuild. Alternatively, I can "drop" in a used engine. Next week, I am going to take it down to a reputable indy the has replaced just one head for a friend on his 3.4, solving the intermix issue. If it turns out to be a reasonable cost to remedy, I will probably go that route as the engine was really tight and trouble-free before the intermix issue.
Cheers,
TomF