Notices
996 Forum 1999-2005
Sponsored by:

Should I buy? '03 911 or '01 TT

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-14-2010 | 02:24 PM
  #16  
kennyPride's Avatar
kennyPride
Thread Starter
Instructor
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
From: Californication
Default

Pete, what do you mean "playing with the words". thanks
Old 05-14-2010 | 02:34 PM
  #17  
Barn996's Avatar
Barn996
Race Director
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 11,801
Likes: 14
From: Kittery, Maine
Default

TT - Audi TT, Tourist Trophy(bike race event). Porsche Turbo(yes, this one has 2 turbos).
Old 05-14-2010 | 10:15 PM
  #18  
kennyPride's Avatar
kennyPride
Thread Starter
Instructor
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
From: Californication
Default

Guys, I saw the TT today. No bad on the outside (body straight, paint in good condition, no obvious damage). I got the car up on a hoist (no sweating, oil leaks except RT Turbo housing was sweating and no structual damage). But the interior was not kept up. Just worn and dirty. I couldn't understand how someone could show a car in that condition. This bothered me as I wondered what else is wrong with the car. Problems noted: Airbag and seatbelt light on; Rt door window regulator issue as window would not close tight; slight 'clunking' when manual shifting hard (possible Tip Trans mount); also Rt/Ft tire worn but Lt/Ft in with ok wear (possible alignment issue). But the engine purred and pulled strong! The price is enticing but I don't want a 30K project car. So I passed. Thanks everyone for your help. Kenny
Old 05-15-2010 | 01:31 PM
  #19  
Macster's Avatar
Macster
Race Director
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 19,032
Likes: 256
From: Centerton, AR
Default

Originally Posted by kennyPride
Guys, I saw the TT today. No bad on the outside (body straight, paint in good condition, no obvious damage). I got the car up on a hoist (no sweating, oil leaks except RT Turbo housing was sweating and no structual damage). But the interior was not kept up. Just worn and dirty. I couldn't understand how someone could show a car in that condition. This bothered me as I wondered what else is wrong with the car. Problems noted: Airbag and seatbelt light on; Rt door window regulator issue as window would not close tight; slight 'clunking' when manual shifting hard (possible Tip Trans mount); also Rt/Ft tire worn but Lt/Ft in with ok wear (possible alignment issue). But the engine purred and pulled strong! The price is enticing but I don't want a 30K project car. So I passed. Thanks everyone for your help. Kenny
Good job. Now you know. And now you have more knowledge for the next car you encounter.

That the seller didn't bother cleaning the car up might suggest the seller neglected the car. Or it might be a sign the seller is just ready to sell and could be weak on the price.

I sold my VW Golf TDi without cleaning it out very well. The interior was not trashed or worn out -- and the rest of the car in good condition cause I had the car serviced regularly -- but I just didn't get around to finding the time to have the car detailed before people started calling about the car and I ended up selling the car to a woman and apologizing for the condition of the car's interior when she handed me the check.

Sincerely,

Macster.
Old 05-18-2010 | 01:51 AM
  #20  
VGM911's Avatar
VGM911
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,219
Likes: 3
From: CURRENT: Audi TT / Audi A3
Default

Originally Posted by Sneaky Pete
HA! Kenny....I think VGM is playing with the words.
As the previous owner of 3 Audi TTs, the term "TT" is imbedded in my brain as a reference to a specific Audi model.

I've always called the Porsche turbo by the name under which it's marketed: "Turbo." The back end says "Turbo" and that's why I've grown comfortable calling it a Porsche Turbo.

All of that said, however, the Turbo is an awesome car. Absolutely a stunning achievement for Porsche in all its iterations over the years. Good luck in your search, Kenny.
Old 05-18-2010 | 02:11 AM
  #21  
Pac996's Avatar
Pac996
Drifting
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,919
Likes: 3
From: Aiea, HI
Default

An audiTT was pulling onto the hwy with me already there and it looked like a scrunched boxer. I guess its a porsche wanna be. Anyway the turbo porsche is a healthy beast. I'd go turbo but your time waiting to get one would be longer unless lucky enough to catch one popping up.......errr sorry you live mainland and not a little island in the pacific. You should be able to find something pretty quick.
Old 05-18-2010 | 02:19 AM
  #22  
Edgy01's Avatar
Edgy01
Poseur
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 17,720
Likes: 246
From: Santa Barbara, CA
Default

What you saw in the 996 turbo tells you that the current owner has decided not to throw more money into it. Remember that any turbo will run you roughly twice as much to maintain as a normal N/A Carrera. There are more things that can and will break, and more things to move when you have to go in to do routine maintenance. What I am seeing with the 996 turbo generation of cars are many buyers of these cars because their purchase prices are reasonable--but you have to really factor in the operating costs. If you are in North America you can't really exploit the speed potential of the turbo anyway--but you appear willing to invest in the maintenance of one without the opportunity to really push it to its limits legally. The price range you cite is broad and there are many opportunities out there for a better car and without having to then sink more and more money into it once you get it.
Old 05-18-2010 | 03:39 AM
  #23  
kennyPride's Avatar
kennyPride
Thread Starter
Instructor
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
From: Californication
Default

Guys good discussion re: Turbo vs normally aspirated 911. I was considering the Turbo because of the "bulletproof" block (GT1) and the kaboom factor of the non-Turbo (IMS). Given I'm looking for a Tip (I'm in my 50's now), the plain Carrera is plenty car for me. I'd like to hear if the concensus is that the Carrera is more economical to maintain than the Turbo (remember the Kaboom factor).
Old 05-18-2010 | 05:47 AM
  #24  
Macster's Avatar
Macster
Race Director
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 19,032
Likes: 256
From: Centerton, AR
Default

Originally Posted by kennyPride
Guys good discussion re: Turbo vs normally aspirated 911. I was considering the Turbo because of the "bulletproof" block (GT1) and the kaboom factor of the non-Turbo (IMS). Given I'm looking for a Tip (I'm in my 50's now), the plain Carrera is plenty car for me. I'd like to hear if the concensus is that the Carrera is more economical to maintain than the Turbo (remember the Kaboom factor).
All other things being equal the Turbo's going to cost more to maintain.

There's more to a Turbo. AWD. More complex engine, mainly Turbos. Oil change a bit more involved. Turbo has dry sump and requires draining oil from engine crankcase, oil tank, and each of the turbo oil sumps. Engine compartment a bit more packed so it takes more time to do anything that requires going in the engine compartment.

For instance, I had the plugs changed in my 03 Turbo a few weeks back and the rear bumper cover had to come off and the intercoolers had to be removed to gain access to the plugs. This probably added an hour's labor to the job over and above what the plug job would have cost had I a NA Carrera.

Hard to quantify the risk of an IMS failure. Course the Turbo has well two turbos and one of these could fail. They appear to be quite reliable though given regular oil changes and proper treatment -- mainly allowing the engine to idle a bit before shutting it off.

Regular oil/filter servicing real important for both cars and in fact all vital fluids. Those Tips are nice but are not drive and forget. Treat a Tip to a regular fluid/filter change every once in a while. Take the owners manual interva and cut it by 2/3rds to 1/2 to be safe.

Oh, Turbo can really go through the gas. Just filled up tonight. 227 miles mixed driving, though 70% or so highway driving. Mileage: 19.4mpg. V-Power. $3.339/gallon. Nearly $40 to fill up the tank.

Tire life likely shorter with the Turbo. And tires might be more expensive to start with cause they're bigger, IIRC.

If running costs a big consideration, an important factor then the non-turbo-charged car the better choice.

Just don't test drive a Turbo before you buy the Carrera.

Sincerely,

Macster.
Old 05-18-2010 | 07:18 AM
  #25  
Pac996's Avatar
Pac996
Drifting
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,919
Likes: 3
From: Aiea, HI
Default

Originally Posted by Macster

Just don't test drive a Turbo before you buy the Carrera.
Excellent advice.
Old 05-18-2010 | 02:22 PM
  #26  
kennyPride's Avatar
kennyPride
Thread Starter
Instructor
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
From: Californication
Default

Mac, I did test drive a Turbo, and it literally took my breath away. Its got punch from about 3000 rpms to red line. Really a different class of car, but the price differential puts them in play (at least to purchase), maintenance maybe another story. Oh yeah the Qtr Panel Turbo scoops are eye catching. O
Old 05-18-2010 | 05:47 PM
  #27  
roadsession's Avatar
roadsession
Three Wheelin'
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,774
Likes: 28
From: MA -
Default

my brother has a 01 996 Turbo. I have an 02 996 C4.
In normal driving, he and I both prefer my car. It has plenty of power and speed, handling is great and very practical daily driver, and is a bit softer with the rutted out roads in Boston.

On the highway we both prefer the Turbo.

There, just made it harder?
Old 05-18-2010 | 09:22 PM
  #28  
2K7TTMIA's Avatar
2K7TTMIA
Drifting
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,005
Likes: 21
Default

Originally Posted by kennyPride
Guys good discussion re: Turbo vs normally aspirated 911. I was considering the Turbo because of the "bulletproof" block (GT1) and the kaboom factor of the non-Turbo (IMS). Given I'm looking for a Tip (I'm in my 50's now), the plain Carrera is plenty car for me. I'd like to hear if the concensus is that the Carrera is more economical to maintain than the Turbo (remember the Kaboom factor).
Address the IMS issue on a C2 or C4S Tip, do a little upgrade to exhaust / intake / ECU Flash and I think you'll be plenty happy with driveability and performance.
IMO, the added maintenance on a Turbo will cost more$ per mile.



Quick Reply: Should I buy? '03 911 or '01 TT



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 08:12 PM.