Notices
996 Forum 1999-2005
Sponsored by:

IMS retrofit problem

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-01-2010 | 11:09 AM
  #46  
Jake Raby's Avatar
Jake Raby
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 779
Likes: 4
From: Cleveland GA USA
Default

Originally Posted by juankimalo
Jake, I am one of your clients.

I purchased the special extracting bearing tool, and 2 packages (bundle) of spin oil adaptor + billet oil filter + magnetic drain plug from you for a friend of mine and me

I'm going to do the retrofit, but I finally decided to proceed to do a similar task :

I ordered to make a reinforced hand made bearing support to a professional lathe operator. He's going to make a 12 mm high quality steel bolt instead of the 8 mm OEM bolt, and asked him to adapt the 3 flange end piece to the new bolt caliber as showed before in other message (from soloporscher barracuda).


This is a pic in which you can see the bearing support design:



I'll get it done tomorrow, and after that, I'll leave my car to my confident specialist mechanic.

I'm going to report this "custom made retrofit kit installation", and you'll have news...



After reading and talking to several oil experts, I decided to complete "the engine protection" with Valvoline Racing 5W50

I'll never use Mobil 1 at all. There is a huge difference.
Another excellent oil to protect your engine is Motul 300V 5W40


Carles is a very high reputed soloporsche fellow, and we are very glad to follow his explanations.

regards from Spain
So you are replacing the HD center stud that came with the bearing kit? I would strongly recommend against that as the unit thats provided is NOT the OEM bolt, it was designed especially for the retrofit bearing kit.

Please do not modify the kit, doing so could compromise the entire effort. Bigger isn't better.
Old 03-01-2010 | 11:14 AM
  #47  
Shark Attack's Avatar
Shark Attack
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 11,013
Likes: 66
From: Southern Utah
Default

Why would you modify the one that comes with the kit? IIRC I think it is larger diameter.....
Old 03-01-2010 | 11:19 AM
  #48  
Chris996's Avatar
Chris996
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 782
Likes: 7
From: Northern VA
Default

Anyone confer with the following quote? I am getting ready to do the IMS upgrade and wanted to know if I need to check for TDC 1 or TDC 4 after locking TDC. My documentation is saying TDC1.


Quote:
The only way I know for sure is to pull the cam plugs and check, Jake might know another way. But if you are only doing the IMS flange/upgrade it should not matter if 1 is TDC or 4 is TDC.
Rick
Old 03-01-2010 | 11:23 AM
  #49  
Shark Attack's Avatar
Shark Attack
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 11,013
Likes: 66
From: Southern Utah
Default

Back to his original mistake,

Why cant he pull the tensioners, put the flang back on. Put the tenstions back in? Do the chains become that loose that they have jumped teeth at this point?
Old 03-01-2010 | 11:24 AM
  #50  
Shark Attack's Avatar
Shark Attack
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 11,013
Likes: 66
From: Southern Utah
Default

Originally Posted by Chris996
Anyone confer with the following quote? I am getting ready to do the IMS upgrade and wanted to know if I need to check for TDC 1 or TDC 4 after locking TDC. My documentation is saying TDC1.
If that is the case, I was just damn lucky
Old 03-01-2010 | 11:54 AM
  #51  
cpalacin's Avatar
cpalacin
Thread Starter
Track Day
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
From: Barcelona - Spain
Default

Originally Posted by Shark Attack
Back to his original mistake,

Why cant he pull the tensioners, put the flang back on. Put the tenstions back in? Do the chains become that loose that they have jumped teeth at this point?

I was just asking me the same question. But I supose it's only to be completly sure, isn't it?
Old 03-01-2010 | 12:34 PM
  #52  
juankimalo's Avatar
juankimalo
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 952
Likes: 42
From: Madrid (Spain)
Default

Originally Posted by Jake Raby
So you are replacing the HD center stud that came with the bearing kit? I would strongly recommend against that as the unit thats provided is NOT the OEM bolt, it was designed especially for the retrofit bearing kit.

Please do not modify the kit, doing so could compromise the entire effort. Bigger isn't better.
No, I have no you retrofit kit
My bearing support is custom made
The bearing I'm going to use is a single row hybrid ceramic from SKF with the same meassure as the OEM one
And I'll get the 3 flange piece modified to being passed through the 12 mm bolt
I'm not modifying your kit

Thanks Jake

Originally Posted by cpalacin
I was just asking me the same question. But I supose it's only to be completly sure, isn't it?
Sorry, I pulled the attention of your question
Old 03-01-2010 | 12:43 PM
  #53  
Jake Raby's Avatar
Jake Raby
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 779
Likes: 4
From: Cleveland GA USA
Default

OK, just wanted to clarify. If its not a kit then pay no attention to what I said :-)
Old 03-01-2010 | 12:52 PM
  #54  
Shark Attack's Avatar
Shark Attack
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 11,013
Likes: 66
From: Southern Utah
Default

Originally Posted by cpalacin
I was just asking me the same question. But I supose it's only to be completly sure, isn't it?
If you put it back in this way, turn it over by hand and see what you have. Sure would be nice if someone could elaberate and share their knowledge on this that knows the internals of the engine a little more than you or I.
Old 03-01-2010 | 01:08 PM
  #55  
Jake Raby's Avatar
Jake Raby
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 779
Likes: 4
From: Cleveland GA USA
Default

If the engine is rotated without tensioners in place the cam timing will be compromised, more than likely. If the tensioners are removed but the engine or camshafts are not rotated the timing should stay OK.

BUT my recommendation has to be that the cam timing be verified. Generally when the IMS ends up in a position like what has been pictured the timing must be reset. These engines have very little piston/ valve clearance and timing deviations must be taken seriously before start up.
Old 03-01-2010 | 01:59 PM
  #56  
Shark Attack's Avatar
Shark Attack
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 11,013
Likes: 66
From: Southern Utah
Default

Jake thank you. You always seem to proceed with caution when giving advice and I understand why. All a person can do is listen to what you have to say and make his choices from there.

If he does get the flang back on, if he turns it by hand 2+ rotations and doesnt get interfearance, is it safe to say he may be ok? Or can their be interfearance when the engine is at RPM that is not there when turing by hand?
Old 03-01-2010 | 02:26 PM
  #57  
Ritter v4.0's Avatar
Ritter v4.0
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 4,344
Likes: 99
From: Nassau, Bahamas and Duluth, Ga.
Default

Its worth checking (ask my last mechanic):
Attached Images  
Old 03-01-2010 | 02:35 PM
  #58  
Shark Attack's Avatar
Shark Attack
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 11,013
Likes: 66
From: Southern Utah
Default

Leaning tower of Valve
Old 03-01-2010 | 03:15 PM
  #59  
Jake Raby's Avatar
Jake Raby
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 779
Likes: 4
From: Cleveland GA USA
Default

The interference may not be noted when the engine is spun over by hand, when the variocam alters valve timing issues that were not present when static can then show up.
Old 03-01-2010 | 03:54 PM
  #60  
Shark Attack's Avatar
Shark Attack
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 11,013
Likes: 66
From: Southern Utah
Default

Originally Posted by Jake Raby
The interference may not be noted when the engine is spun over by hand, when the variocam alters valve timing issues that were not present when static can then show up.
ewwwwwww... with that said. I wouldnt even chance it... I would just make sure its right... No room for boo boo's there.

Damn you vario cams!
I damn thee!


Quick Reply: IMS retrofit problem



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 04:22 AM.