Notices
996 Forum 1999-2005
Sponsored by:

DE; what to modify next??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-06-2009, 02:32 PM
  #16  
Van
Rennlist Member
 
Van's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Hyde Park, NY
Posts: 12,008
Received 93 Likes on 63 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Rob996
I would really appreciate your advice and thoughts on the next logical and intelligent modifications? I do use the car as a summer daily driver.

1. Race seats with five point harness. that i will use only for DE events

2. Suspension upgrade, Bilstein PSS10, new antisway bars with drop and toe links. (open to other suspension brands besides bilstein) Ive heard and read mixed reviews about them.

3. All four rotors have spider cracks, and will need to be replaced shortly, should i go for the Performance Friction dimple 2 piece rotors, or just keep buying the OE or Zimmermann cheaper rotors, as the wear pretty fast with the Pagid pads.


My next event is on Monday and Tuesday at WGI, and I go sleep dreaming about the best lines around the track...

Any comments and thoughts will be most appreciated?

Thanks for your time
I would do those items in this order: 1, 3, 2.

Do GT3 seats first (I think they're just fine for a daily driver) and a harness bar and harnesses. Not only is it a safety thing, but your car control abilities will go up since you no longer need to "hold" yourself in the seat by bracing your knees and elbows against the door/center console.

Then, upgrade to good brake pads. If you like, you can do fancier rotors, too - they might last longer between replacements, but they'll also cost more money. What we want to achieve with a track brake setup is a setup where you'll never experience brake fade, the grip will be strong and the modulation will be excellent.

And, after you've done those 2 things, then I'd focus on the suspension. I have the X74 and think it's really good. I've also heard good things about the PSS10. The addition of GT3 adjustable sway bars to either one is probably also good.

All the rest is just seat time. Drive in the rain. Drive in the dry. Try new tracks. Get more instruction.
Old 10-06-2009, 05:12 PM
  #17  
racer
Drifting
 
racer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Virginia
Posts: 2,981
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Do you use the back seat? Then race seats/ GT3 seats will render that useless. Swapping seats for the few events/year becomes a real PITA as well. A rollbar/harness bar doesn't help either.

How many total track days have you done?

Going to R comps, without an aggressive alignment, you will begin to chew up the outside shoulders. You will want to find more negative camber to preserve your tires.

Safety is a slippery slope.. Once race seats and harnesses go in, the arguement for a rollbar/cage comes into play. That becomes big money. The counter argument is, is it safe to drive such a car, particularly with a cage, on the street?
Old 10-06-2009, 05:27 PM
  #18  
quickxotica
Rennlist Member
 
quickxotica's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: San Francisco & parts north
Posts: 1,010
Received 189 Likes on 85 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Van
I would do those items in this order: 1, 3, 2.

Do GT3 seats first (I think they're just fine for a daily driver) and a harness bar and harnesses. Not only is it a safety thing, but your car control abilities will go up since you no longer need to "hold" yourself in the seat by bracing your knees and elbows against the door/center console.

Then, upgrade to good brake pads. If you like, you can do fancier rotors, too - they might last longer between replacements, but they'll also cost more money. What we want to achieve with a track brake setup is a setup where you'll never experience brake fade, the grip will be strong and the modulation will be excellent.

And, after you've done those 2 things, then I'd focus on the suspension. I have the X74 and think it's really good. I've also heard good things about the PSS10. The addition of GT3 adjustable sway bars to either one is probably also good.

All the rest is just seat time. Drive in the rain. Drive in the dry. Try new tracks. Get more instruction.
+1 on Van's advice: 1) Safety: seats & bolt-in roll bar (or harness bar if you'll need to remove it between events), HANS device, fire suit, etc, then 2) X74 suspension package & GT3 (street) front lower control arms, then 3) better Pagid pads (RS14 is my fave), 4) X51 oil pan.

Then stop! Do much more and you'll kill your street-usability entirely.
Old 10-07-2009, 01:38 AM
  #19  
RamVA
Racer
 
RamVA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 332
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jumper5836
Cool, I would suggest though now learn to car with the R-compounds and then start with the suspension next season or when your used to the new tires and the new capabilities.
I would do suspension before R-comps.
Old 10-07-2009, 01:39 PM
  #20  
himself
Rennlist Member
 
himself's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 3,736
Received 37 Likes on 28 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RamVA
I would do suspension before R-comps.
LOL. Way to read the thread!

Post #1:
Originally Posted by OP
I have ... Michelin Pilot Sport Cups
lol Probably lack of coffee!

-td
Old 10-07-2009, 11:26 PM
  #21  
RamVA
Racer
 
RamVA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 332
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by himself
LOL. Way to read the thread!

Post #1:

lol Probably lack of coffee!

-td
I read it.

1 - Someone's going to look up this thread in the future
2 - That's the way I feel, and
3 - I think the OP should buy suspension.

I drink plenty of coffee.
Old 11-09-2009, 11:15 AM
  #22  
Rob996
Pro
Thread Starter
 
Rob996's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Northeast
Posts: 512
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Thanks for all your input, and thoughtful recomendations to my post...
I have had many conversations with my indy mechanic regarding the actual costs and perceived benefits and advantages of each upgrade. He did mention one extra addon item that has'nt been mentioned in this post, Install Mode camber plates at the same time as the PSS10's minimum in the front, since the OE rubber suspenion mounts are probably shot, and dont give you the same turn in and steering response.
If the goal is to maintain a balance between a car that performs well on and off the track, and also retain some value and appeal in re-selling the car. Usually the more a car is modified for track, you reduce the amount of potential buyers, and hinder the price you will get. I'm not selling now, but my bucketlist includes a move up to a GT3 .
Thanks again to all of you..

PS, i love the headlights on my 996
Old 11-09-2009, 12:17 PM
  #23  
Darren
Burning Brakes
 
Darren's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Malvern, Pa.
Posts: 1,050
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Rob996
He did mention one extra addon item that has'nt been mentioned in this post, Install Mode camber plates at the same time as the PSS10's minimum in the front, since the OE rubber suspenion mounts are probably shot, and dont give you the same turn in and steering response.
Yup, good suggestion (sperical upper strut mount/aka camber plate), but only if you're really pushing hard on the track. The spherical bearings on the camber plates will wear out after 5-10,000 miles of normal driving on the street. It's an added cost and hassle, and like everything else, it's a trade off. The bearings themselves are $40 or so each, maybe 2 hours shop time to remove them and press in new bearings. Then you'd need to realign the car also. Figure that is a $500 bill every 10,000 miles.

Many people do well with the rubber upper mounts. I was running 265/315 Michelins and driving in the instructor group and the rubber would rip out after a couple of events (and then it starts rattling), so they didn't work so well for me. With smaller tires or driving slower, they would last longer.
Old 11-09-2009, 01:55 PM
  #24  
quickxotica
Rennlist Member
 
quickxotica's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: San Francisco & parts north
Posts: 1,010
Received 189 Likes on 85 Posts
Default

For 60% street use, I would avoid all-metal upper strut mounts. Too crashy/loud for my taste with the bad roads we have around here. If you go X74 instead of PSS10, the X74 come pre-asembled with fresh upper mounts, matching bumpstops, etc. It's all plug-and-play. Disadvantages of X74 are that they're not threaded so you can't really corner-balance the car, and you'll need to combine them with GT3 front lower control arms to get enough negative camber. But as far as a ride/handling compormise for your usage pattern, X74 would be great. And as a side benefit, since the shocks aren't adjustable, you'll always know they're perfectly matched to the springs! :-)
Old 11-09-2009, 02:48 PM
  #25  
Darren
Burning Brakes
 
Darren's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Malvern, Pa.
Posts: 1,050
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by quickxotica
For 60% street use, I would avoid all-metal upper strut mounts. Too crashy/loud for my taste with the bad roads we have around here. If you go X74 instead of PSS10, the X74 come pre-asembled with fresh upper mounts, matching bumpstops, etc. It's all plug-and-play. Disadvantages of X74 are that they're not threaded so you can't really corner-balance the car, and you'll need to combine them with GT3 front lower control arms to get enough negative camber. But as far as a ride/handling compormise for your usage pattern, X74 would be great. And as a side benefit, since the shocks aren't adjustable, you'll always know they're perfectly matched to the springs! :-)
I disagree -- the all-metal (spherical) upper strut mounts are not crashy/loud for the street as long as you don't have your struts set to ultra stiff. IMHO the PSS9/10 suspension rides BETTER on the street with the spherical upper mounts than the stock suspension does. The stock suspension is CRAP. The PSS9/10 suspension handles the oscillations much better (it's a much better damper).

I don't understand changing the struts if you can't adjust the ride height/corner balance.

Also, the PSS suspension has valving that is perfectly matched to the springs, on all settings, which is sort of the point of the thing. You need to adjust them for conditions not for the spring rate.
Old 11-09-2009, 05:50 PM
  #26  
Rob996
Pro
Thread Starter
 
Rob996's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Northeast
Posts: 512
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

The indy actually said he would not install the Bilsteins if i didnt do the upper mounts at the same time, as he felt it was onlt half the solution, although said he would accept leaving the OE rear mounts. I had serious concerns of going with solid mounts, especially with the crappy roads we have, and the sound of metal on metal makes me feel like my filings in my teeth will fall out before getting home.

John, I had done some research into the X-73 suspension, and looked like a good option until it came time to understanding the shocks and sway bars as separate components, and how sway bars can mask the performance of the shocks in locking each side together. There was also the question of corner balancing, and adjustability. Ride height on my 996 drives me a little crazy, as i find the car way too high especially in the front, and the PSS help remedy that issue. Although i'm still concerned about metal suspension mounts, it seems counter-intuative.

My indy hasnt steered me wrong yet, and will take the leap of faith.
Old 11-09-2009, 06:15 PM
  #27  
Darren
Burning Brakes
 
Darren's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Malvern, Pa.
Posts: 1,050
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Hopefully your mechanic knows who pays him, otherwise you probably need a different one. Everything is a compromise, it's your compromise. Ask him to guarantee that the spherical bearings won't fail in 10,000 miles. Whether you use camber plates or the stock mounts, either one will have durability issues -- sphericals fail on the street, the rubber stock mount will fail on the track (eventually). Again unless you are a really fast driver in the fastest groups, you'll probably be fine with the rubber mounts until you get that fast

I'm not sure your point about the shocks and sway bars working differently on the X-73 suspension. All components in any suspension need to be sized appropriately to work together. That isn't different from one package to another.
Old 11-10-2009, 04:22 PM
  #28  
Rob996
Pro
Thread Starter
 
Rob996's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Northeast
Posts: 512
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Darren, You were absolutely correct about the limited lifespan of the spherical bearings, and my Indy confirmed that they will need to be replaced periodically depending on use and wear, and had no willingness to guarentee these bearings. Since i use the car on the street and track either stock mounts or camber plates will fail eventually, but the rubber will be more comfortable and quiet until i get faster on the track. I am running either Blue or Black run groups depending on the PCA region. My last event was at WGI October 12-13th in Black with NiagaraPCA. From the clolr of the leaves in your picture it looks like you were there at the same time.
Thanks again for your advice.
Old 11-10-2009, 08:43 PM
  #29  
quickxotica
Rennlist Member
 
quickxotica's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: San Francisco & parts north
Posts: 1,010
Received 189 Likes on 85 Posts
Default

Darren - agreed that the stock suspension sucks. When I changed mine to new X74 parts it was a massive improvement.
Rob - I was upfront about the limitations of the X74/X73 kits. They are not anywhere near as adjustable as a threaded-body coilover setup, obviously. I chose X74 in part because I wanted a factory-approved suspension rather than aftermarket. I've done aftermarket coil-overs before (not PSS9/10 stuff, but anyway I wanted a set-it-and-forget it suspension this time). But let me just add one more thing: if you hate the high stock ride height, rest assured that X74 is plenty low enough. I'm at 25.5 inches from floor to top center of wheel arch, F&R. So that single criteria probably shouldn't factor into your choice between the two alternatives. Both will get you low enough. Other factors already mentioned by others are more important.
Good luck.
Old 11-10-2009, 09:14 PM
  #30  
AudiOn19s
Race Car
 
AudiOn19s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Columbus OH
Posts: 4,511
Received 48 Likes on 38 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Darren
Yup, good suggestion (sperical upper strut mount/aka camber plate), but only if you're really pushing hard on the track. The spherical bearings on the camber plates will wear out after 5-10,000 miles of normal driving on the street.
IDK. While I won't argue the fact that the bearings will wear out over time, the OEM GT3 mouts are on all street driven GT3's, many having much more than 10k miles and you never hear complaints about them wearing out or making noise. Never had an issue with noise with the GT3 monoballs on my 996 but they didn't have that many miles on them.

I've had a set of ground control Monoball camber plates on my M3 for about 17K miles with no sounds from them.

I think the quality of the bearing and build quality of the plate can have a big effect here. I had Schnell camber plates on my 996 and they started to make noises after 100 miles and I got pissed and took them off.

Andy

p.s. I've got a set of GT3 monoballs sitting in my basement if anyone is interested.


Quick Reply: DE; what to modify next??



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 11:47 AM.