Over-rev hit 16,000rpm "money shift" ...possible?? (1999 C4)
#31
Board Certified Porsche Trauma Surgeon
Cayenne Grief Counselor
Rennlist Member
Cayenne Grief Counselor
Rennlist Member
16k overrev is very possible! i know a guy who has a 20k aftermarket tach. http://www.samsmotor.se/koso/tacho.htm
and his money shift sent it to 15k
and his money shift sent it to 15k
#33
Super Moderator
Needs More Cowbell
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Needs More Cowbell
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Your logic would apply for a Type 1 (engine accelerating under fuel/spark control).
It would not be correct for a mechanically induced engine crankshaft rotation.
Example:
Turn ignition off.
Connect tow strap to vehicle
Put vehicle in gear.
Tow vehicle now begins to pull the vehicle and continues.
The tire circumference, speed and gear ratio will determine the engine (crankshaft) RPM, independent of any 'redline' on the tach or 'rev limiter' (engine is off in this case).
It is the same as when you used to have one of those little spring driven mechanical cars as a kid...you would push it against the ground for as long and as fast as you could in order to get the RPM's up as high as possible....mechanically induced over rev.
#34
^ Sorry, but the fact of the matter is, @ 2nd gear, 7200rpm, there is a given wheel RPM. If you shift instantaneously into first and the wheel RPM does not drop (in real life, there will be a slight drop during a shift), then the engine RPM can be calculated by the ratio between 1st and 2nd gear, which is what the previous poster suggested.
The wheel RPM which takes into consideration its diameter, angular velocity, yada yada, can be considered the constant in this situation.
The wheel RPM which takes into consideration its diameter, angular velocity, yada yada, can be considered the constant in this situation.
#35
Burning Brakes
1. Would you even be able to put it in first at that speed (not that I would try)
2. How can you not be sure if you actually did or not a money shift?
2. How can you not be sure if you actually did or not a money shift?
#36
Rennlist Member
No, 1 byte = 8 bits. Not including parity, of course.
Also, Durametric (they claim to read overrevs like PIWIS) only displays range 1 and range 2 for the 996, not actual values.
Third, range two overrevs are not the number of times the car has been overrev'd but how many sparks occurred. i.e. if a car was overreved one time but held there for a while, there could be a huge range 2 overrev number from a single missed shift.
Also, Durametric (they claim to read overrevs like PIWIS) only displays range 1 and range 2 for the 996, not actual values.
Third, range two overrevs are not the number of times the car has been overrev'd but how many sparks occurred. i.e. if a car was overreved one time but held there for a while, there could be a huge range 2 overrev number from a single missed shift.
#37
Super Moderator
Needs More Cowbell
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Needs More Cowbell
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
^ Sorry, but the fact of the matter is, @ 2nd gear, 7200rpm, there is a given wheel RPM. If you shift instantaneously into first and the wheel RPM does not drop (in real life, there will be a slight drop during a shift), then the engine RPM can be calculated by the ratio between 1st and 2nd gear, which is what the previous poster suggested.
The wheel RPM which takes into consideration its diameter, angular velocity, yada yada, can be considered the constant in this situation.
The wheel RPM which takes into consideration its diameter, angular velocity, yada yada, can be considered the constant in this situation.
It is still unclear what happened in this particular case, since the original post seemed to indicate possible 3-1 shift, but it still not clear what may have happened in this case.
#38
Three Wheelin'
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Mission Viejo, CA
Posts: 1,726
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
That's true with nearly all manuals that I've ever driven.
When I drive hard, I'm only concerned about the 4 -> 5 shift...that I might hit 3rd instead.
So....you're not going crazy -- you didn't jam it into 1st.
Also, if you went from 3rd to 2nd -- let's think about that for a minute.
If you would have been at redline in 3rd doing almost ~100mph, is that possible you were going that fast?
Then you went down to 2nd?
But the other poster is right too, the motor would have collapsed right at that moment....
I don't know about their previous repairs, but what the shop is telling you now does not compute in any way.....
#39
Race Car
Incorrect.
Your logic would apply for a Type 1 (engine accelerating under fuel/spark control).
It would not be correct for a mechanically induced engine crankshaft rotation.
Example:
Turn ignition off.
Connect tow strap to vehicle
Put vehicle in gear.
Tow vehicle now begins to pull the vehicle and continues.
The tire circumference, speed and gear ratio will determine the engine (crankshaft) RPM, independent of any 'redline' on the tach or 'rev limiter' (engine is off in this case).
It is the same as when you used to have one of those little spring driven mechanical cars as a kid...you would push it against the ground for as long and as fast as you could in order to get the RPM's up as high as possible....mechanically induced over rev.
Your logic would apply for a Type 1 (engine accelerating under fuel/spark control).
It would not be correct for a mechanically induced engine crankshaft rotation.
Example:
Turn ignition off.
Connect tow strap to vehicle
Put vehicle in gear.
Tow vehicle now begins to pull the vehicle and continues.
The tire circumference, speed and gear ratio will determine the engine (crankshaft) RPM, independent of any 'redline' on the tach or 'rev limiter' (engine is off in this case).
It is the same as when you used to have one of those little spring driven mechanical cars as a kid...you would push it against the ground for as long and as fast as you could in order to get the RPM's up as high as possible....mechanically induced over rev.
Read below what relaxed90 said - he says the same as me.
^ Sorry, but the fact of the matter is, @ 2nd gear, 7200rpm, there is a given wheel RPM. If you shift instantaneously into first and the wheel RPM does not drop (in real life, there will be a slight drop during a shift), then the engine RPM can be calculated by the ratio between 1st and 2nd gear, which is what the previous poster suggested.
The wheel RPM which takes into consideration its diameter, angular velocity, yada yada, can be considered the constant in this situation.
The wheel RPM which takes into consideration its diameter, angular velocity, yada yada, can be considered the constant in this situation.
Exactly.
#40
Burning Brakes
It is possible to mechanically over rev an engine to infinity via a downshift..
My experience with this has proven that its near impossible to get a transaxle into first gear at such high speeds.. It can be done, but it takes effort.
I'll be forcing an engine failure in a few weeks on the dyno just like this and I'll let you know how it comes out.
My experience with this has proven that its near impossible to get a transaxle into first gear at such high speeds.. It can be done, but it takes effort.
I'll be forcing an engine failure in a few weeks on the dyno just like this and I'll let you know how it comes out.
#41
Race Director
It is possible to mechanically over rev an engine to infinity via a downshift..
My experience with this has proven that its near impossible to get a transaxle into first gear at such high speeds.. It can be done, but it takes effort.
I'll be forcing an engine failure in a few weeks on the dyno just like this and I'll let you know how it comes out.
My experience with this has proven that its near impossible to get a transaxle into first gear at such high speeds.. It can be done, but it takes effort.
I'll be forcing an engine failure in a few weeks on the dyno just like this and I'll let you know how it comes out.
Sincerely,
Macster.
#42
Race Director
#43
Race Car
Then, you use destructive testing and a lot of data can be gathered.
Im sure Raby is doing the same but only see what will let go first and determine the weak link of the motor I assume.
#44
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Not that there's a lockout per se, but downshifting into 1st gear at anything over a crawl is very difficult.
That's true with nearly all manuals that I've ever driven.
When I drive hard, I'm only concerned about the 4 -> 5 shift...that I might hit 3rd instead.
So....you're not going crazy -- you didn't jam it into 1st.
Also, if you went from 3rd to 2nd -- let's think about that for a minute.
If you would have been at redline in 3rd doing almost ~100mph, is that possible you were going that fast?
Then you went down to 2nd?
But the other poster is right too, the motor would have collapsed right at that moment....
I don't know about their previous repairs, but what the shop is telling you now does not compute in any way.....
That's true with nearly all manuals that I've ever driven.
When I drive hard, I'm only concerned about the 4 -> 5 shift...that I might hit 3rd instead.
So....you're not going crazy -- you didn't jam it into 1st.
Also, if you went from 3rd to 2nd -- let's think about that for a minute.
If you would have been at redline in 3rd doing almost ~100mph, is that possible you were going that fast?
Then you went down to 2nd?
But the other poster is right too, the motor would have collapsed right at that moment....
I don't know about their previous repairs, but what the shop is telling you now does not compute in any way.....
#45
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
My computer science degree from 1982 says you are correct although in the early days bytes tended to vary in size depending on what chip set your computer was running on.