Notices
996 Forum 1999-2005
Sponsored by:

09 Cayman S superceeds the 996

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-20-2008, 02:02 PM
  #46  
newton982
Instructor
 
newton982's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: NYC/FL
Posts: 212
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

As long as you enjoy driving your car 996, 3.4 or 3.6, no big deal. If you want to have the fastest, you've got to be willing to spend the $ to upgrade every few years or so. Anything that does sub-5s 0-60, 170mph + top speed and handles well is quick enough in my opinion.

One of these days, I wouldn't be too surprised if Accords/Camrys are in the 300/320hp range!
Old 11-20-2008, 05:39 PM
  #47  
SH || NC
Drifting
 
SH || NC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Cary NC
Posts: 3,049
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JimB
When the makers of sportscars worry more about perserving an image than out engineering the competition, their cars stop being dream cars!
Regardless of what Porsche does to a Boxster, my 911 C4S doesn’t stop being my dream car.
Old 11-20-2008, 08:01 PM
  #48  
redridge
Nordschleife Master
 
redridge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 7,446
Received 62 Likes on 49 Posts
Default

Where is that video of a Cayman S vs 99 Carrera 4.... and the Carrera won. It was here 2-3 months ago.
Old 11-20-2008, 08:07 PM
  #49  
washington dc porsche
Drifting
 
washington dc porsche's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Prince George's County, MD
Posts: 2,481
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Camry's, Accords, and Maxima's are pretty close to that now.

Originally Posted by dreamtripper007
As long as you enjoy driving your car 996, 3.4 or 3.6, no big deal. If you want to have the fastest, you've got to be willing to spend the $ to upgrade every few years or so. Anything that does sub-5s 0-60, 170mph + top speed and handles well is quick enough in my opinion.

One of these days, I wouldn't be too surprised if Accords/Camrys are in the 300/320hp range!
Old 11-20-2008, 10:05 PM
  #50  
ivangene
Parts Specialist
Rennlist Member
 
ivangene's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 16,326
Likes: 0
Received 24 Likes on 17 Posts
Default

this really blossomed into a big read....
Old 11-20-2008, 10:23 PM
  #51  
jumper5836
Nordschleife Master
Thread Starter
 
jumper5836's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: great white north
Posts: 8,533
Received 72 Likes on 48 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ivangene
this really blossomed into a big read....
hey don't blame me, I just wanted to mark the end of the 996 era.
Best bang for the buck is a a basic 996 stripped of all but a steering wheel and gear shifter.
Old 11-21-2008, 01:00 AM
  #52  
450knotOffice
Racer
 
450knotOffice's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Mission Viejo, CA
Posts: 487
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jumper5836
...
Best bang for the buck is a a basic 996 stripped of all but a steering wheel and gear shifter.
My 996 may very well end up as my spec car eventually.
Old 11-21-2008, 01:47 AM
  #53  
BrandX
Instructor
 
BrandX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: V3H 3R4
Posts: 193
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mooty
hey john.
i did both, 996c2 to cay s.
i am faster in cay s for sure. the difference is most dramatic at BW and SP. at TH and LS, the tq of C2 has some advantages over cay.

i had less prob (reliability and durability issues) in the C2 vs cay s.

if they put GT3 motor, LSD and a better gear box in the cay. all of my GT3's will be on the block.
What did he say??
Old 11-21-2008, 09:20 AM
  #54  
gota911
Newbies Hospitality Director
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
gota911's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Winston-Salem, NC
Posts: 18,084
Likes: 0
Received 34 Likes on 33 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by BrandX
What did he say??
BW, SP, TH, and LS are all race tracks

BW = Button Willow
SP = I can't remember
TH = Thunder Hill
LS = Laguna Seca
Old 11-21-2008, 12:17 PM
  #55  
BrandX
Instructor
 
BrandX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: V3H 3R4
Posts: 193
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Oh, got it - thanks. SP must be Sears Point.
Old 11-21-2008, 04:37 PM
  #56  
quickxotica
Rennlist Member
 
quickxotica's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: San Francisco & parts north
Posts: 1,013
Received 197 Likes on 88 Posts
Default

I agree none of this matters... you just gotta drive the one that makes you happiest. I only sold the Cayman S 'cause I needed back seats for the kid. But the bonus is the 996 has surprised me by being more fun (IMHO) on the track.

At Sears Point my best laptimes in the Cayman S were in the 1:55.6 to 1:56.0 range; (stock CS on 888 tires). Same track last month in the (new to me) '03 996 C2 I managed to run 1:55.1. Again, stock car but this time on MPSCups. The Cayman had the PASM suspension. The 996 has US M030 and factory Aerokit (fwiw).
At TH my Cayman S did 2:07.7 on 888's, whereas my 996 did an easy 2:09.0 on STREET TIRES on my first day with it. FWIW.

But my data is meaningless: I'm no Pro. Who knows which is truly faster? I think it's too close to call.

My point is simply that I'm having as much (or maybe more) fun in the 996 as I was in the CS.... therefore I don't think 996 owners need to worry about whether or not the new DFI Cayman S is going to "supercede" their ride. I'm certainly not losing any sleep over it.
Old 11-21-2008, 05:19 PM
  #57  
Jake Ok
Burning Brakes
 
Jake Ok's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 883
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Kind of like what happened with BMW when the 335i came out, the E46 M3 were outcast. But I still can't get over the looks of the Cayman.



Quick Reply: 09 Cayman S superceeds the 996



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 07:31 AM.