Notices
996 Forum 1999-2005
Sponsored by:

pss9'S VS. pss10'S, Opinions?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-10-2008 | 11:24 PM
  #1  
Dharn55's Avatar
Dharn55
Thread Starter
Drifting
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,528
Likes: 175
From: Glenview, IL
Default pss9'S VS. pss10'S, Opinions?

After almost 8 years and 48,000 miles the shocks on my 2000 C4 Cab are getting pretty bad, ride just isn't what it used to be. Recently one of the rear shocks started leaking so now it is time for an upgrade. I had been considering a set of PSS9's for some time now. Until the release of the PSS10's the best prcing I had seen on PSS('s for a C4 was about $1,800 + shipping. Now I can get a set for less than $1,700, delivered. However, the Tirerack has a set of the PSS10's for a C4 for just over $2,300 delivered. So about a $600 difference. the question is, is it worth it to pay the extra for the PSS10's. One more setting, easier to adjust, and a more linear progression on the settings are the major differences.

So are their any opinions out there ( I know there is usually a derth of opinions around here)?

Last edited by Dharn55; 05-10-2008 at 11:25 PM. Reason: CORrECT TITLE
Old 05-11-2008 | 12:14 AM
  #2  
redridge's Avatar
redridge
Nordschleife Master
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 7,446
Likes: 63
Default

I dont think the 10's have a huge advantage over the nine... especially if your gonna set it and forget it. Think of it this way. Your install price will be $400 on the 9 and $1600 hundred on the 10.
Old 05-11-2008 | 09:49 AM
  #3  
gofor28off's Avatar
gofor28off
Racer
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 263
Likes: 0
From: Ontario, Canada
Default

Why would there be such a difference in installation cost?
Old 05-11-2008 | 01:23 PM
  #4  
ArneeA's Avatar
ArneeA
Drifting
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,422
Likes: 1
From: 91x15
Default

Originally Posted by gofor28off
Why would there be such a difference in installation cost?
I think what redridge is saying is that there's virtually no difference between the two parts that warrant the large price difference, therefore, the large price difference paid would end up being labor.
Old 05-11-2008 | 06:33 PM
  #5  
GaryAZ's Avatar
GaryAZ
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 5,349
Likes: 287
From: Scottsdale, AZ
Default

Originally Posted by Dharn55
One more setting, easier to adjust, and a more linear progression on the settings are the major differences.
If those are the "advantages" I don't see the point. I've had PSS9s for over 2 years. You can adjust them from softer than stock to firmer than is comfortable for most people (I don't mind "full firm" but passengers tend to gripe). Easier to adjust? I don't think PSS9s are difficult. The rears are simple. For the fronts, I'm jacking the car anyway to switch wheels for the track so no big deal. If it's easier to adjust ride height, I'm not sure that’s an advantage since any ride-height change should be accompanied by an alignment. More linear progression? Don't understand that one.

What does one more setting really mean? Is is actually stiffer or softer than the PSS9s or is it "Mine goes to Eleven" marketing fluff?

Some comments: It's fun to play with the damping but to me the most significant change to the car's handling came from the lowered ride height (less nose dive under braking) and the ability to dial in a little more negative camber. On the street I don't like the fronts to be "full firm". If you have to brake hard on a rough surface, stiff front shocks send you into the ABS very quickly.

With a lowered car you must be conscientious. Don't let rear tires "descend" from a curb simultaneously. I smacked the oil pan once. Only a small scratch resulted but I had to swallow my heart down out of my throat.



Quick Reply: pss9'S VS. pss10'S, Opinions?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 03:04 AM.