Notices
996 Forum 1999-2005
Sponsored by:

Race Car Update

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 7, 2008 | 07:38 AM
  #16  
MarkM's Avatar
MarkM
Thread Starter
Burning Brakes
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 858
Likes: 0
From: Atlanta, GA
Default

Jim, yes I have a bet with Matthew on that, but I am confident it will be one of the lightest on the track regardless of the net weight. What did you get your old car down to?

One of the really nice things about the matter cage is that it only weighed about 60 lbs before the door bars were added, so total should be well under 75.

Not many options left on the weight, except for removing the bumper shocks, or whatever they call them on a waterpumper.

Remember, those door panels are saving me at least 100 lbs per side! And don't even get me started on the helium in the tires.
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2008 | 11:59 AM
  #17  
Ray S's Avatar
Ray S
Ironman 140.6
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 13,794
Likes: 12
From: North Carolina
Default

Originally Posted by MarkM
Since there are only 3 weeks before the Road Altanta race, I stopped by to check on the car progress today.

Attached are some great pictures that highlight the attention to details my mechanic has.
Cool Car Mark!!! I'm very jealous.....

I plan to turn my own 996 into a race car in a few years (after it's done performing DD duties) so I really enjoy seeing your pics.
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2008 | 12:00 PM
  #18  
JimB's Avatar
JimB
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 2,569
Likes: 4
From: MN
Default

Originally Posted by MarkM
Jim, yes I have a bet with Matthew on that, but I am confident it will be one of the lightest on the track regardless of the net weight. What did you get your old car down to?

One of the really nice things about the matter cage is that it only weighed about 60 lbs before the door bars were added, so total should be well under 75.

Not many options left on the weight, except for removing the bumper shocks, or whatever they call them on a waterpumper.

Remember, those door panels are saving me at least 100 lbs per side! And don't even get me started on the helium in the tires.
Mark,
In club race form my car was about 2800 without ballast. That was with two seats and carpet in the passenger area but no carpet on the drivers side, no door panels, no window on the drivers side, light carpet (felt) in back, no mufflers, no cats, no airbags, all the insulation behind the plastic removed, etc. My wheels were very light one piece forged magnesium BBS racing wheels.

I had an Optima battery which would have been a little heavier and my cage was heavier. You should be close but I wouldn't bet too much on being under 2800.
Jim
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2008 | 01:36 PM
  #19  
Riad's Avatar
Riad
Chandler!
Rennlist Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 52,996
Likes: 37
From: Nashville, TN
Default

What are you transporting a kidney?
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
Bonnet.jpg (103.0 KB, 270 views)
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2008 | 01:42 PM
  #20  
judd944's Avatar
judd944
Rennlist Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 3,990
Likes: 7
From: Lexington, KY !!!!
Default

Seal gray and Boxster red! great Combo! I have not seen that on a 911. got any pics of the car before vs after the transformation?
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2008 | 01:59 PM
  #21  
JimB's Avatar
JimB
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 2,569
Likes: 4
From: MN
Default

Originally Posted by riad
What are you transporting a kidney?
That's his lunch. Those enduros get long.
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2008 | 02:02 PM
  #22  
Trj's Avatar
Trj
Addict
Rennlist Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,238
Likes: 52
Default

Originally Posted by JimB
That's his lunch. Those enduros get long.
Jim what headers/muffler/cat set up did you run on you x51. Thanks
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2008 | 02:14 PM
  #23  
JimB's Avatar
JimB
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 2,569
Likes: 4
From: MN
Default

Originally Posted by Trj
Jim what headers/muffler/cat set up did you run on you x51. Thanks
I had straight pipes with the stock X51 headers.
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2008 | 02:15 PM
  #24  
Trj's Avatar
Trj
Addict
Rennlist Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,238
Likes: 52
Default

Did you loose low end torque out of turns?
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2008 | 03:12 PM
  #25  
JimB's Avatar
JimB
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 2,569
Likes: 4
From: MN
Default

Originally Posted by Trj
Did you loose low end torque out of turns?
Yes. The car had no torque below 4500 rpms, but above 4500 it screamed. We actually had a design to put a moveable flap in the exhaust that would add backpressure at lower rpms and open up above 4500 but we never got it working. I figured as soon as I perfected it PCA would outlaw it anyway. It would have freaked the corner workers out. Coming out of the corner the car would have had a muffled, hissing sound then all of a sudden it would have opened up and roared. Oh well. Damn I put a lot of effort into that car.
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2008 | 03:16 PM
  #26  
MarkM's Avatar
MarkM
Thread Starter
Burning Brakes
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 858
Likes: 0
From: Atlanta, GA
Default

Jim, sounds like a poor man's turbo setup. I like it!
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2008 | 03:30 PM
  #27  
Trj's Avatar
Trj
Addict
Rennlist Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,238
Likes: 52
Default

Jim, thanks pm sent.
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2008 | 03:48 PM
  #28  
BillJ's Avatar
BillJ
Rennlist Member
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 870
Likes: 16
From: Charlotte, NC
Default

Originally Posted by JimB
Yes. The car had no torque below 4500 rpms, but above 4500 it screamed. We actually had a design to put a moveable flap in the exhaust that would add backpressure at lower rpms and open up above 4500 but we never got it working. I figured as soon as I perfected it PCA would outlaw it anyway. It would have freaked the corner workers out. Coming out of the corner the car would have had a muffled, hissing sound then all of a sudden it would have opened up and roared. Oh well. Damn I put a lot of effort into that car.
Have a buddy that is using an aston martin variable exhaust valve that is electical and vaccuum activated. May want to look into it as he plumbed it inline himself...
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2008 | 03:53 PM
  #29  
JimB's Avatar
JimB
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 2,569
Likes: 4
From: MN
Default

Originally Posted by BillJ
Have a buddy that is using an aston martin variable exhaust valve that is electical and vaccuum activated. May want to look into it as he plumbed it inline himself...
You can actually buy in-line butterfly valves from Summit Racing but they take way too long to open and close. I wonder if that's what your friend used.
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2008 | 04:26 PM
  #30  
BillJ's Avatar
BillJ
Rennlist Member
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 870
Likes: 16
From: Charlotte, NC
Default

Nope - he used the stock aston martin (vantage maybe) part that is part of the exhaust system. When tooling around at low RPM it stays closed, but when you get on it the valve opens and lets the exhaust run free. It has both an electrical and vaccuum hookup which indicates that it may respond to both quick depression of the throttle (electrical) and increases pressure (vaccuum/mechanical) which may get around the delay given that the electrical impulse will move much faster than the mechanical one...I will give him a call and get more info.
Reply



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 03:28 PM.