Notices
996 Forum 1999-2005
Sponsored by:

Just came back from a local Porsche shop - Interesting news (3.4l oiling)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-17-2007, 12:02 PM
  #31  
bk12
Racer
 
bk12's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: So Cal
Posts: 296
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

And I thought I would only have to deal with engineering dept. vs. marketing dept. debates at work.
Old 11-17-2007, 12:31 PM
  #32  
BruceP
Drifting
 
BruceP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,508
Likes: 0
Received 24 Likes on 18 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by AndrewWK
The phrase I used was "number one priority." Might want to read it again. Nothing "socialist" or "consumer-as-victim" about it. Far from it, actually. You are absolutely right there are lots of reasons, I was providing a basic example to give everyone an idea of what really happens. My perspective is (obviously) from the engineering side of things. What the engineer intends and designs is never exactly what makes it into the living room. Just to over simplify things again
Not to split hairs, but from an engineering perspective the "number one priority" is actually cost which, yes, bears on profit, but it's kind of a different problem. Given free rein, engineers could design a car that was awesome at everything, including reliability and durability. But it would be so expensive that nobody would buy it. Every car, even a Bugatti Veyron, has stuff in it that was a product of "how cheaply can we make this non-mission-critical part so we can claw back the cost of that mission-critical part?". Marketing ends up getting involved in this stuff both because marketing has to figure out what price the car can be sold for and, with high volume manufacturers, what the consumer demands or will tolerate. Yes, Porsche makes the biggest unit margins on the planet. But they also only sold an average of 20,000 units a year or so of the 996. That has some real amortization challenges, which can only be solved either by pricing up (which they did as much as they thought they could) or cost cutting where they thought they could get away with it (which they did).

Over a beer, I bet I'd have some Toyota stories you, as an engineer, would enjoy. Their secret weapon, quality wise, is actually production engineering. They aren't brilliant design engineers; what they're brilliant at is engineering production processes. This, I suspect, is the real reason Porsche contracted them on the 996 project. You can only decontent a car so much in the name of margins. A company that had been building cars by hand for 40 years would need some help figuring out how find margins in production efficiency.

Oh, I forgot Toyota's other secret weapon: They leverage their high volume to play unbelievable hardball with suppliers. Try that on 20,000 units a year.
Old 11-18-2007, 06:23 AM
  #33  
rdstemler
Burning Brakes
 
rdstemler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Cape Cod
Posts: 856
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Where can I get one of those 100 mpg carbs??? Will they fit on a Porsche?? How many extra horsepower do you get?? What does it sound like???
Old 11-18-2007, 02:36 PM
  #34  
Chads996
Nordschleife Master
Thread Starter
 
Chads996's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Soowanee, GA
Posts: 5,829
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default UPDATE - More information found.

Greetings all:

As I am scouring the information online, I have come up with some leads to where theTech was getting his information. Interestingly enough, here is what I have found thus far:

Information sources:
Pelican Parts Online parts diagrams (Turbo Oil Return)
Porsche 996/C2/GT3 Workshop manuals

The following Diagrams describe the comparision between the two solutions:

Here is the X51 oiling Kit with the Dual Chamber Pump and oil line.



Here is the Turbo Return/scavenge pump and the location of the oil line. Note - the heat shield requires modification to make the components fit (this is the case with both the X51 & this version). The oil line may very well be a custom component fabricated to work. In my opinion, a braided / reinforced line will work nicely as would a custom bent and threaded tube. Actual factory parts may not be necessarily required to fit the line or make this work. Heat resistance would be advised due to its location next to the header.



Summary - Based upon visual clues, this certainly appears to be a viable option to this very talked about problem with the 3.4L engine. And as far as I can tell, the Turbo's pump would fit and fit in the correct orientation on the motor. Cost for this part could likely be around $450-600 each. And this does not include the machining of the valve cover.

More investigation will happen on Monday when I can speak with more detail to the Tech. I should have even more answers the deeper I get into this. My full intention is to do this modification and possible prepare kits (parts listings that others could use).

Oh, and before I forget...it is also VERY obvious that the use of the X51 oil pan with this mod is VERY recommended.

Stay tuned. More to come.

Chad

Last edited by Chads996; 11-18-2007 at 05:52 PM.
Old 11-18-2007, 03:36 PM
  #35  
redridge
Nordschleife Master
 
redridge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 7,446
Received 61 Likes on 48 Posts
Default

Chad...do you know what is driving this pump?
Old 11-18-2007, 05:47 PM
  #36  
Chads996
Nordschleife Master
Thread Starter
 
Chads996's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Soowanee, GA
Posts: 5,829
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

The existing gear driven mechanism. It simply replaces the existing scavenge pump. The difference lies in the additional intake point for the oil line.

C.
Old 11-18-2007, 06:16 PM
  #37  
redridge
Nordschleife Master
 
redridge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 7,446
Received 61 Likes on 48 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Chads996
The existing gear driven mechanism. It simply replaces the existing scavenge pump. The difference lies in the additional intake point for the oil line.

C.
Ok, now that make sense, seems simple enough. Does this scavenges the oil under braking condtion, since the oil is forced to move at the back of the engine? Is this the primary function of the extra port?
Old 11-18-2007, 06:23 PM
  #38  
Benjamin Choi
Banned
 
Benjamin Choi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 3,473
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

starting armchair porsche QBs from the South!
Old 11-18-2007, 07:22 PM
  #39  
Chads996
Nordschleife Master
Thread Starter
 
Chads996's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Soowanee, GA
Posts: 5,829
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by redridge
Ok, now that make sense, seems simple enough. Does this scavenges the oil under braking condtion, since the oil is forced to move at the back of the engine? Is this the primary function of the extra port?
The oil scavenge pump works all the time, just like the central one in the oil pan. It is constantly working to move oil back to the primary supply. As long as the engine is running, it is running.

C.
Old 11-18-2007, 08:53 PM
  #40  
gota911
Newbies Hospitality Director
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
gota911's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Winston-Salem, NC
Posts: 18,085
Likes: 0
Received 32 Likes on 32 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Benjamin Choi
starting armchair porsche QBs from the South!
Huh??
Old 11-19-2007, 01:22 PM
  #41  
Chads996
Nordschleife Master
Thread Starter
 
Chads996's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Soowanee, GA
Posts: 5,829
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Thread has been changed. Please see here:

https://rennlist.com/forums/996-forum/392583-1999-carrera-3-4l-oiling-modification-and-retrofit.html

C.



Quick Reply: Just came back from a local Porsche shop - Interesting news (3.4l oiling)



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 01:10 AM.