Notices
996 Forum 1999-2005
Sponsored by:

Another Engine Failure

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-12-2007, 04:06 PM
  #61  
1999Porsche911
Race Car
 
1999Porsche911's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 4,159
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

All I know is that I put more pressure on my little old 99 C2 engine than a stage 3 TT and so far she has absolutely no problems. When she blows...she blows. If I wanted to eliminate all risk of engine blowing, I would ride a horse.

Here's a better poll: How many 996's that had internal engine problems were running Mobil Water?
Old 01-12-2007, 04:21 PM
  #62  
P-Car fanatic
Pro
 
P-Car fanatic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 530
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 1999Porsche911
Here's a better poll: How many 996's that had internal engine problems were running Mobil Water?



Old 01-12-2007, 04:22 PM
  #63  
blk on blk
Three Wheelin'
 
blk on blk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Houston, TEXAS!
Posts: 1,502
Received 9 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by murphyslaw1978
The only thing that bothers me is the way Porsche's reputation is changing and how Porsche is responding to that change. I don't want Porsche to end up where Jaguar is.

Honestly this is what bothered me more than the 5k mile sblown engine. It was their attitude and the manner in which they went about dealing with me that pissed me off more than the engine itself. Hell most companies are going to more component replacement than repair. I know BMW is doing more and more engine replacement than engien repairs, Porsche, and others as well. I think the issues festers and pisses people off because Porsche treats them as though they do not matter. It is more a customer care issue than the actual defective engine issue. At least it was for me. Certainly I was concerned about the long term affect of m car going forward, but really I have warranty until 2011 so I am not that concerned. I would not have thought much of it at all had Porsche simply given me some answers, and had some sense of urgency in dealing with me and my issue.
Old 01-12-2007, 04:31 PM
  #64  
1999Porsche911
Race Car
 
1999Porsche911's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 4,159
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by blk on blk
Honestly this is what bothered me more than the 5k mile sblown engine. It was their attitude and the manner in which they went about dealing with me that pissed me off more than the engine itself. Hell most companies are going to more component replacement than repair. I know BMW is doing more and more engine replacement than engien repairs, Porsche, and others as well. I think the issues festers and pisses people off because Porsche treats them as though they do not matter. It is more a customer care issue than the actual defective engine issue. At least it was for me. Certainly I was concerned about the long term affect of m car going forward, but really I have warranty until 2011 so I am not that concerned. I would not have thought much of it at all had Porsche simply given me some answers, and had some sense of urgency in dealing with me and my issue.

It is inevitable that Porsche WILL go the way a Jaguar. Their goal, now, is to maximize profit by marketting to the masses and taking shortcuts in quality. The only saving grace for them is that most of their competition is doing the same.....meaning that, although Porsche will not be the quality sports car they once were, they wil be among the better ones by today's lower standards.

Rather than raising their standards to stay near the top, Porsche will stay there because industry standards will continue to be lowered.

i.e: If you are the top student in a class of morons.....you're still a moron.
Old 01-12-2007, 04:34 PM
  #65  
LVDell
Nordschleife Master
 
LVDell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Tobacco Road, NC
Posts: 5,225
Likes: 0
Received 28 Likes on 23 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 1999Porsche911
Rather than raising their standards to stay near the top, Porsche will stay there because industry standards will continue to be lowered.

i.e: If you are the top student in a class of morons.....you're still a moron.
Spot on!

The one-eyed man is king in the land of the blind.
Old 01-12-2007, 04:34 PM
  #66  
MJBird993
Drifting
 
MJBird993's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Beautiful North Carolina
Posts: 2,026
Received 22 Likes on 20 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by cdodkin
For the record, I have personal experience with 2 engine failures
As statistics and odds go (and I will be glad to pull some statistics out of my *** if you need me too ) it seems to me that it is incredibly unlikely that one person would go through two engine failures on the same car due to a fault in the engine.

So, my question is, at what point does a rational person start to wonder, hey, maybe it ain't the car? Oh sure, you can say "I never tracked it and I don't abuse it" but the term "abuse" means many different things to many people. Heck, maybe it was that one time you ran it up to 5600 RPM when the engine wasn't warm yet. Or that fifty-seven times you bounced it off of the rev-limiter? Or the 602 times you floored the accelerator but short-shifted it to "save the engine"? Or maybe you just didn't break the engine in properly? Or, you used the wrong oil. Or you let your wife drive it that one Sunday...

So that's just a thought that I'm sharing.

Personally, I think that any engine failure in a car of this price and presumed quality before 100,000 miles is unacceptable. However, in the real world, I know that **** happens. I was one of the lucky many who had the nakasil engine block replaced by BMW. BMW did step up to the plate and admit fault and replace the blocks affected and extended the warranties, but for the first several thousand people who experienced the problems, I'm sure they went through hell to get there. And those series of cars still have the worst resale values.

I'm not trying to make any point here - I'm just trying to make an observation that there are a lot of unknowns and unanswered questions. No one here knows for sure about anything. And I'm sure of that statistic.

Michael
Old 01-12-2007, 04:37 PM
  #67  
1999Porsche911
Race Car
 
1999Porsche911's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 4,159
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by LVDell
Spot on!

The one-eyed man is king in the land of the blind.
I like that one, Dell.
Old 01-12-2007, 04:41 PM
  #68  
cdodkin
Drifting
 
cdodkin's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Another Ex pat Brit in SoCal
Posts: 2,442
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Michael, one engine on each car, a '97 and a '99.

I drove one, my wife still drives the other.

9,000 miles before failure on the '97, less than 8,000 miles on the '99

Both had new engines under warranty from Porsche, no issues when they pulled the redline stats etc from the on-board systems.

Both were dead before their first scheduled services.

They were just poorly manufactured engines.

The '99 now has 75,000 miles on the clock, with my wife driving it every day.

I sold the '97 at 35,000 miles, having had no further issues, and now have an 03 996 C2 - which I've yet to break!

Chris.


Last edited by cdodkin; 01-12-2007 at 04:58 PM.
Old 01-12-2007, 04:41 PM
  #69  
LVDell
Nordschleife Master
 
LVDell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Tobacco Road, NC
Posts: 5,225
Likes: 0
Received 28 Likes on 23 Posts
Default

Well, I think we have officially beat this horse enough. Time to get the martini fixings out
Old 01-12-2007, 05:06 PM
  #70  
rleeq
Racer
Thread Starter
 
rleeq's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 378
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Fly911
I have a 2000 996, and have just replaced the engine. At 54000 miles the engine fluids intermixed, coolant in the oil and oil in the coolant. This is a problem well known to Porsche and PCNA. When Porsche changed from air cooled to water cooled engines, they outsourced the casting of the engine blocks and heads. At the same time they mixed different alloys, aluminum and magnesium. The most common failures are either bad block castings or corroded magnesium, where the metal is eaten up. This happens in the coolant paths, where eventually the fluids intermix. Every pre 2002 Boxter and 996 is a potential engine trap. Thousands of unlucky Porsche owners have over the years had to change their engines. Some are covered by the warrenty, but for those unfortunate that the warrenty is expired, PCNA admitts nothing. They even deny that the problem exist. However, due to the fact that the problem absolutely do exist, Porsche (Germany) offers the 996 3.4L engine to a subsidised price of approximately $8,000. THe whole cooling system and radiators have to be completely flushed and cleaned, and maybe even changed out. I paid $12,000 for the whole job at Pro Technik in Houston, and I'm very happy with the job. The engine is a 2006 3.4L with all the upgrades done over the years, new caastings, new alloy material in the cylinder heads, other cam shaft duration, new AC compressor and all other equipment on the engine. The only things that are not new are the fly-wheel and the cats and mufflers. Basically, the car is like new!
The 3.6L engine does not fit unless you change the ECU and wiring harness. This is very expencive, plus the fact that the 3.6L engine is wice the price ot the 3.4L. For the extra 25HP it's not worth it.
The fact that PCNA denies any knowledge of the above described problem, and throws all the cost on unfortunate Porsche owners, is extremely disappointing. Also the fact the PCA does not put pressure on PCNA, so that enthusiastic Porsche owners still will be loyal to Porsche, is incomprehensible. PCA should not only be an organisation that glorify Porsche, but also give aid and assistance members that are victims for a Porsche design failure. Are the links too close between PCA and PCNA, both located in Atlanta, GA?

The same happen to my engine. Coolant in the oil and oil in the coolant. The Porsche service manager said it was likely the oil/water heat exchanger when I first report it but it turns out to be either the head or head gasket. Maybe it was something else. I don’t think I will ever find out for sure and that’s a pity. Part of the $13,200 was to remove the radiators to flush them and to flush all the coolant lines.
I’m trying to remain positive that either way I will be getting a new (remanufactured) engine with all the upgrades but as I said earlier “I don’t feel the love form Porsche.”
Old 01-12-2007, 05:11 PM
  #71  
Steven C.
Rennlist Member
 
Steven C.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: TEXAS
Posts: 2,190
Received 69 Likes on 36 Posts
Default

One last thing. I love Pcars. I love washing them, driving them, waxing them looking at them....... I do not consider them cheap to maintain but neither is a Ferrari, Maserati, Lambo..... So every car I want to own is not as reliable or cheap to maintain as my daughters Honda or my wifes Lexus. That is OK with me because....I love these cars.......

The Honda may be a better car for you, not me and I am willing to pay the difference. PCNA has always been this way with customers, always from my experiences of 25 years and many friends in the business. Somehow they have managed to become one of the most profitable car companies in the business with this long term attitude. I still love their cars.

So just like everything in life you make a choice. Bitching about it will only wear you out. Meaning, decide what you want and live with the consequences. They are what they are
Old 01-12-2007, 05:13 PM
  #72  
LVDell
Nordschleife Master
 
LVDell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Tobacco Road, NC
Posts: 5,225
Likes: 0
Received 28 Likes on 23 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by rleeq
The same happen to my engine. Coolant in the oil and oil in the coolant. The Porsche service manager said it was likely the oil/water heat exchanger when I first report it but it turns out to be either the head or head gasket. Maybe it was something else. I don’t think I will ever find out for sure and that’s a pity. Part of the $13,200 was to remove the radiators to flush them and to flush all the coolant lines.
I’m trying to remain positive that either way I will be getting a new (remanufactured) engine with all the upgrades but as I said earlier “I don’t feel the love form Porsche.”
Lee.....I have to commend you on your incredible composure during this ordeal. SUre hope that new engine gives you many years of driving enjoyment. As for the oil exchanger, did they tell you that was something this that could fall under preventative maintenace or rather when it goes, it goes type of part? Something to think about for the rest of the M96 motor group to have looked into during a checkup.
Old 01-12-2007, 06:43 PM
  #73  
Mike Murphy
Rennlist Member
 
Mike Murphy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 8,955
Received 1,739 Likes on 1,081 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Steven C.
One last thing. I love Pcars. I love washing them, driving them, waxing them looking at them....... I do not consider them cheap to maintain but neither is a Ferrari, Maserati, Lambo..... So every car I want to own is not as reliable or cheap to maintain as my daughters Honda or my wifes Lexus. That is OK with me because....I love these cars.......

The Honda may be a better car for you, not me and I am willing to pay the difference. PCNA has always been this way with customers, always from my experiences of 25 years and many friends in the business. Somehow they have managed to become one of the most profitable car companies in the business with this long term attitude. I still love their cars.

So just like everything in life you make a choice. Bitching about it will only wear you out. Meaning, decide what you want and live with the consequences. They are what they are
You make very good points, but I can't help remembering my Mom's 87 Acura Legend. That car was redlined so many times and was almost flat out abused by just about every member of my family and countless friends. The engine always ran fine, and we only changed the oil and timing belt on that engine.

The definition of a "bulletproof engine" means that it should be able to take that abuse.
Old 01-12-2007, 06:44 PM
  #74  
Mike Murphy
Rennlist Member
 
Mike Murphy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 8,955
Received 1,739 Likes on 1,081 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by MJBird993
As statistics and odds go (and I will be glad to pull some statistics out of my *** if you need me too ) it seems to me that it is incredibly unlikely that one person would go through two engine failures on the same car due to a fault in the engine.

So, my question is, at what point does a rational person start to wonder, hey, maybe it ain't the car? Oh sure, you can say "I never tracked it and I don't abuse it" but the term "abuse" means many different things to many people. Heck, maybe it was that one time you ran it up to 5600 RPM when the engine wasn't warm yet. Or that fifty-seven times you bounced it off of the rev-limiter? Or the 602 times you floored the accelerator but short-shifted it to "save the engine"? Or maybe you just didn't break the engine in properly? Or, you used the wrong oil. Or you let your wife drive it that one Sunday...

So that's just a thought that I'm sharing.

Personally, I think that any engine failure in a car of this price and presumed quality before 100,000 miles is unacceptable. However, in the real world, I know that **** happens. I was one of the lucky many who had the nakasil engine block replaced by BMW. BMW did step up to the plate and admit fault and replace the blocks affected and extended the warranties, but for the first several thousand people who experienced the problems, I'm sure they went through hell to get there. And those series of cars still have the worst resale values.

I'm not trying to make any point here - I'm just trying to make an observation that there are a lot of unknowns and unanswered questions. No one here knows for sure about anything. And I'm sure of that statistic.

Michael
See my post about the Acura Legend that we abused.
Old 01-12-2007, 08:55 PM
  #75  
fast1
Race Car
 
fast1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 3,899
Received 221 Likes on 146 Posts
Default

Rather than raising their standards to stay near the top, Porsche will stay there because industry standards will continue to be lowered.

Based on everything that I have read, the quality of cars today has risen and risen rather dramatically over the past decade, rather than fallen as your post would suggest. Notwithstanding all of the anecdotal info about failed engines on this forum, Porsche still is either at the top or near the top of every quality report that I've read. The J D Powers report for 2006 for example has the Porsche Cayman S as the car with the fewest reported quality problems on new cars, and other Porsche models were also at or near the top. To me this is a remarkable accomplishment when you consider that Porsche builds very high performance engines as compared to the detuned transportation appliances manufactured by Toyota and Honda.


Quick Reply: Another Engine Failure



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 12:23 PM.