Notices
996 Forum 1999-2005
Sponsored by:

Castrol RS 10W60 , why not?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-30-2007, 11:48 AM
  #31  
1999Porsche911
Race Car
 
1999Porsche911's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 4,159
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Ray S
Ok let me try to understand. If your engine "ticks" and you are running one of Porsche recommended oils you should change to 15w50 right away to eliminate the "tick". If your engine "ticks" using 15w50 the noise is obviously from some problem that is not oil related.

Seems to me (if he were to employ your previous logic) he should try an even higher viscosity. Maybe some 25w70 is in order?

Someone should give it the good old college try......
As he stated, he has no ticking during non track driving since changing to the 15W50. So, yes, your sarcastic statement is correct. He is only experiencing a ticking after a track session and it has not even been confirmed that it is the valvetrain that is making the noise. There are alot of possible sources and causes of engine ticks.

Please, enlighten us how a 5W50 oil and a 15W50 oil differ when at temps of 240F+? If the oil flow into the lifters is adequate when the oil temp is 100F, then why would it not be adequate at 240F? If his oil temperature is closer to 300F, he is going to hear valve ticking at times regardless of the oil he uses especially on tight corner tracks.
Old 05-31-2007, 01:07 AM
  #32  
Ray S
Ironman 140.6
Rennlist Member
 
Ray S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 13,794
Received 10 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 1999Porsche911
Please, enlighten us how a 5W50 oil and a 15W50 oil differ when at temps of 240F+?
Show me where I ever said they did?

Please enlighten us with your life tests on m96 engines run on Porsche's recommended fills vs. your recommendations.......

Show us your test data that has lead to your conclusions (photo's, test data, anything??). Please share why Porsche experts are wrong in their assertions that VarioCam Plus will not function correctly without the recommended oils. Show us your test data that shows VC + needs the thicker fills you recommend.

Do you have any substantive test data or just a lot of guesses??
Old 05-31-2007, 01:37 AM
  #33  
karlooz
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
karlooz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: SF bay area, CA
Posts: 2,094
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

dayum this sh t is getting efing old.

do a search on oil and do you'll decide for yourself if 1999 knows what the hell he's talking about.
Old 05-31-2007, 02:48 AM
  #34  
springgeyser
Racer
 
springgeyser's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 462
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Bobistheoilguy website. They are shared all their finding on the different weight oil and brand. Great site.
Old 05-31-2007, 10:54 AM
  #35  
redridge
Nordschleife Master
 
redridge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 7,446
Received 62 Likes on 49 Posts
Default

classic stuff!!!
Old 05-31-2007, 11:11 AM
  #36  
Tippy
Race Car
 
Tippy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 4,978
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

I have never seen this thread before but to run 60W oil is crazy like the OP asked, the tolerances is too tight to run this thick of oil.

You are getting in the GEAR OIL viscocities, this can not be good for the motor at all. Imagine how long it would take to push the oil throught the entire engine at start-up. The start-up wear would probably be greater.
Old 05-31-2007, 11:20 AM
  #37  
1999Porsche911
Race Car
 
1999Porsche911's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 4,159
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Tippy
I have never seen this thread before but to run 60W oil is crazy like the OP asked, the tolerances is too tight to run this thick of oil.

You are getting in the GEAR OIL viscocities, this can not be good for the motor at all. Imagine how long it would take to push the oil throught the entire engine at start-up. The start-up wear would probably be greater.
Nobody suggested running straight 60 weight oil.
Old 05-31-2007, 11:23 AM
  #38  
Tippy
Race Car
 
Tippy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 4,978
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 1999Porsche911
Nobody suggested running straight 60 weight oil.
True, but 60, that is a little too thick. I could see using this in drag racing engines with loose tolerances but what I have read is the M96 has tighter tolerances for increased efficiency and longevity.
Old 05-31-2007, 11:30 AM
  #39  
1999Porsche911
Race Car
 
1999Porsche911's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 4,159
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Tippy
True, but 60, that is a little too thick. I could see using this in drag racing engines with loose tolerances but what I have read is the M96 has tighter tolerances for increased efficiency and longevity.

Multiviscosity oil does not work that way. And the "tight tolerances" you speak about...you mean the ones that contribute to the various engine rattles, etc, or are you speaking of the ones that keep the engine from leaking and burning oil?
Old 05-31-2007, 11:35 AM
  #40  
Benjamin Choi
Banned
 
Benjamin Choi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 3,473
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

just drive guys
Old 05-31-2007, 11:40 AM
  #41  
Tippy
Race Car
 
Tippy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 4,978
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 1999Porsche911
Multiviscosity oil does not work that way. And the "tight tolerances" you speak about...you mean the ones that contribute to the various engine rattles, etc, or are you speaking of the ones that keep the engine from leaking and burning oil?
Okay, what I was taught and correct me if I am wrong is that the first number is what the oil flows in the winter time, hence the W for winter. The second number is the actual viscocity.

So, 10W, as I was taught flows like a straight 10W in the cold climates, the 60 in this case is the actual protection weight or simply 60 weight.

As far as tolerances, I read that the piston/bore relationship and the friction bearing/journal relationships are tighter than ever as Porsche was trying to squeeze every once of longevity from the M96.
Old 05-31-2007, 12:57 PM
  #42  
bgiere
Rennlist Member
 
bgiere's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: in a racecar somewhere...
Posts: 3,374
Received 51 Likes on 42 Posts
Default

Guys, run an oil from the approved list and move on....arguing oil with 1999 is a complete waste of time. He will not accept facts and seems to enjoy the dispute a little too much.
Old 05-31-2007, 01:17 PM
  #43  
BruceP
Drifting
 
BruceP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,508
Likes: 0
Received 24 Likes on 18 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 1999Porsche911
Contrary to the marketing of Mobil, the 0W40 DOES NOT provide for proper lubrication in hotter climates at startup. Open your window and just listen to the tick, tick tick, when you park your car after a good run and let it sit over night. That's the sound of your lifters being void of enough oil after the Mobil water drained out overnight.

Now, change the oil to a 5W50 or 15W50 and listen again.

The viscosity of 40 on the hot side is laughable when your oil temps are running at 230F, 240F, 250F..... But, if you don't plan on keeping the car long, it doesn't matter.
I run Mobil 0W40 and do not get this tick, even in hot weather. Why?
Old 06-01-2007, 04:29 AM
  #44  
03Targa
Instructor
 
03Targa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 132
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Darn, I was hoping you guys would give a big thumbs up to the 10W -60 as I have a case of the stuff sitting in my garage left over from the e46 M3. It was their recommended oil for that tall inline 6 engine. I wonder why? (not being sarcastic)
Old 06-01-2007, 08:44 AM
  #45  
juankimalo
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
 
juankimalo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Madrid (Spain)
Posts: 951
Received 42 Likes on 23 Posts
Default

Two of the best specialist on Porsche mechanical in Madrid, told me that they don't like 10W60. They said that it was very good al BMW-M engines.
They recomend always synthetic 5W40 for 996 Carrera, from approved list.
They use Castrol 5W40, and Motul 5W40 EX 8100 not Mobil 1 0W40 , too much thin in warm and hot climates


Quick Reply: Castrol RS 10W60 , why not?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 12:39 AM.