Notices
996 Forum 1999-2005
Sponsored by:

q-2000 with 50k miles or 2002 with 70k

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-25-2006, 06:30 PM
  #1  
nota_troll
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
nota_troll's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 3,114
Received 7 Likes on 4 Posts
Default q-2000 with 50k miles or 2002 with 70k

Hey. Lurking more and more these days and need some advice.

There are 2 cars I'm 'eyeballing' and both for about the same money give or take 2k. The 2000 has less miles and black interior but the 2002 has the larger motor but higher mileage.

I'm leaning towards the 2002 since it's not my daily driver. Thoughts? TIA...
Old 02-25-2006, 07:38 PM
  #2  
LVDell
Nordschleife Master
 
LVDell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Tobacco Road, NC
Posts: 5,225
Likes: 0
Received 28 Likes on 23 Posts
Default

Are either CPO or are they private party with no warranty? Just something to factor in. As for the miles, at that point (50 v 70) there really isn't any difference. I would go with the 02 being newer so you have the larger motor, increased torsional rigidity, facelift, etc, etc, etc,.......
Old 02-26-2006, 01:25 AM
  #3  
TT Surgeon
Race Director
 
TT Surgeon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: KC ex pat marooned in NY
Posts: 13,005
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

'00 with 50k, 70k is too much on a '02 car with an unknown history.
Old 02-26-2006, 03:09 AM
  #4  
djantlive
Drifting
 
djantlive's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,420
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

i'd spend more and get a lower mileage car. how someone put on 70k in 4 yrs on a 02 is beyond me. That person much drive it everywhere which concerns me how the car is generally treated.

if you had to choose the two, i'd base the purchase based on the condition of the cars. if two are equal in condition, i'd choose the 02 bc of many benefits and you will eventually have a better resale value if you ever trade it. definitely have both compression tested when doing PPI. Also look up warranty history for RMS repair. Clutch and brake are probly in need or replacement on both cars.
Old 02-26-2006, 03:57 AM
  #5  
LVDell
Nordschleife Master
 
LVDell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Tobacco Road, NC
Posts: 5,225
Likes: 0
Received 28 Likes on 23 Posts
Default

Seriously fellas, you complain if the car has too few miles and then you complain if it has to many. This is a lose-lose situation.

He asked about 2 cars, and for a car (the 02) to be driven 15-17K a year is not that much. We do NOT know the history yet on either car. Personally, I would take the 02 following the advice of most here on teh board........get the NEWEST car you can afford.

However, I would still look around more (if cost is not as much a factor) to find something with fewer miles and CPO'ed. It shouldn't be hard to find a CPO'ed 02 with 40K miles for in the low 50's range.
Old 02-26-2006, 04:08 AM
  #6  
Chris 996
Racer
 
Chris 996's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Southern California
Posts: 319
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Take the 02.
Old 02-26-2006, 08:33 AM
  #7  
gota911
Newbies Hospitality Director
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
gota911's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Winston-Salem, NC
Posts: 18,084
Likes: 0
Received 34 Likes on 33 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by LVDell
Seriously fellas, you complain if the car has too few miles and then you complain if it has to many. This is a lose-lose situation.

He asked about 2 cars, and for a car (the 02) to be driven 15-17K a year is not that much. We do NOT know the history yet on either car. Personally, I would take the 02 following the advice of most here on teh board........get the NEWEST car you can afford.

However, I would still look around more (if cost is not as much a factor) to find something with fewer miles and CPO'ed. It shouldn't be hard to find a CPO'ed 02 with 40K miles for in the low 50's range.
Dell - I totally agree with you. I recall much "speculation" in the thread Engine Replacement XXX (or some such version) that cars driven few miles per year MAY be prone to RMS. Many said STAY AWAY from the low mileage cars. Then there are the multiple comments in multiple threads that say "don't worry about the miles, just drive it!" Now this particular '02 has too many miles to even consider? WTF?

In about two weeks I will have owned my '04 996 for one year. I have driven it 17,350 miles in 12 months. Two more years like that will equal +52K miles driven by me in three years, then add the 6,450 miles that were on the clock when I bought it and you are pushing 59K miles in four years. I can see someone getting 70K easily if it is a daily driver. So what do I do??? Park mine in the garage during all of the months that have an "R" in the month name (like eating oysters)?... or drive only in odd numbered months.? WTF!?!?!
Old 02-26-2006, 12:10 PM
  #8  
agio
Racer
 
agio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Paradise
Posts: 428
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

How about a near perfect (nothing's perfect after all) 2002 996 Coupe--Artic Silver with 13600 miles? Any ideas as to what is a good price?
Old 02-26-2006, 05:36 PM
  #9  
lowside67
Rennlist Member
 
lowside67's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Posts: 1,430
Received 37 Likes on 27 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by djantlive
i'd spend more and get a lower mileage car. how someone put on 70k in 4 yrs on a 02 is beyond me. That person much drive it everywhere which concerns me how the car is generally treated.

if you had to choose the two, i'd base the purchase based on the condition of the cars. if two are equal in condition, i'd choose the 02 bc of many benefits and you will eventually have a better resale value if you ever trade it. definitely have both compression tested when doing PPI. Also look up warranty history for RMS repair. Clutch and brake are probly in need or replacement on both cars.
That attitude is so typical of this forum, "how dare somebody drive these cars every day?" My 99 has just about 60k miles and has the original clutch with no need for replacement anytime soon. Brakes wear out before 50 or 70k and would need to be replaced before then, so on what basis can you say that it needs to be replaced? I, along with many other owners, drive my car virtually every day, even -gasp- in the rain! It's a little known fact that these cars in fact do not melt in rain and even feature a water-tight cabin!

That's just ridiculous. I've seen cars with 80000 miles that looked nicer and drove better than one with half that. Mileage is an indicator of the car's condition, but certainly isnt a reason to discount a car, 70xxx miles is hardly all miled out.
Old 02-26-2006, 06:12 PM
  #10  
ojpimpson
Banned
 
ojpimpson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 313
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

No win Id keep looking for A better car something with cpo. You wiil sleep better at night.
Old 02-27-2006, 05:02 AM
  #11  
Bijan
Rennlist Member
 
Bijan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Sydney Australia
Posts: 620
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by nota_troll
Hey. Lurking more and more these days and need some advice.

There are 2 cars I'm 'eyeballing' and both for about the same money give or take 2k. The 2000 has less miles and black interior but the 2002 has the larger motor but higher mileage.

I'm leaning towards the 2002 since it's not my daily driver. Thoughts? TIA...
Some avatars seem familiar, was it the 993 forum
If difficult to decide then I would go for the later 02 model
Old 02-27-2006, 11:52 AM
  #12  
karlooz
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
karlooz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: SF bay area, CA
Posts: 2,094
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

i would hold out for a lower mileage '02+
Old 02-27-2006, 11:28 PM
  #13  
nota_troll
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
nota_troll's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 3,114
Received 7 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Thank you for your responses. No decision yet and RL membership is well worth the money.
Old 02-27-2006, 11:37 PM
  #14  
Ray S
Ironman 140.6
Rennlist Member
 
Ray S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 13,794
Received 10 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

All else (other than the mileage) being equal, I'd vote for the '02



Quick Reply: q-2000 with 50k miles or 2002 with 70k



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 08:27 AM.