Notices
996 Forum 1999-2005
Sponsored by:

Cupholders - I don't get it

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-04-2002, 04:31 AM
  #16  
Rob in WA
Cap'n Insane the Engorged
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
Rob in WA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Where Mountains Meet the Sea
Posts: 10,449
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Post

After driving my car from Minneapolis to Seattle w/no cupholder, I can say that I like them. The 996 is Grand Touring car right?

In my Targa cans fit perfectly in the door pockets. I put a Bird armrest in my 996, mainly for the cupholder. IS THAT SO WRONG?!?!?! <img src="graemlins/crying.gif" border="0" alt="[crying]" />
Old 05-04-2002, 09:41 AM
  #17  
Flying Finn
King of Cool
Rennlist Member

 
Flying Finn's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Miami Beach, FL
Posts: 14,218
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Post

I know guys...

I'm quite 'purist' when it coms to things like this but for me, every little bit of more comfort creatures (& weight) here and there that Porsche keeps adding is going to the wrong direction (911 shouldn't be a grand tourer, it should be a sportscar)...

Yes, those 996 cupholders don't make any difference performance wise, but it's the principle to me, plust the fact that you see so many people drinking coffee, shaving, putting on a make-up etc. which is not something they should do while they are driving!

Anyway, I understand that on a long trip etc. cupholder is a nice little comfort thing but for me, Porsche is a sportscar, period.

So I'd like to take it w/out any of these things, lightweight & fast, rather that having a sunroof (my car has one btw, couldn't find w/out ), cupholders etc. but I know there are lot of people who don't think like that which is fine with me, I just hope that Porsche is not turning into a luxury sedan.

However, that aftermarket armrest (that you install b/ween the seats) weights quite a bit & I think that's something you should't do (adding weight that is, I'm trying to lose it, me included! ) but, if you do, that's your 'problem' , I'll have my car w/out. <img src="graemlins/beerchug.gif" border="0" alt="[cheers]" />
Old 05-04-2002, 01:23 PM
  #18  
Cupcar
Rennlist Member
 
Cupcar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: California Boardwalk, Skanderborg Denmark
Posts: 3,693
Received 100 Likes on 68 Posts
Red face

Flying Finn you are right on. I don't mind if people want A/C,power inflating and reclining seats,automatic car wash, Carnegy hall stereos, power windows, sunroofs, moonroofs, cruise controls, trip computers, espresso machines, motorized cup holders, satellite navigation and communication devices etc. built into their car, that's their choice.

The problem is this stuff becomes standard equipment and those of us who like simple light cars-a SPORTSCAR not a Sporty car- do not have a choice. <img src="graemlins/cussing.gif" border="0" alt="[grrrrrrr]" /> <img src="graemlins/burnout.gif" border="0" alt="[burnout]" />
Old 05-04-2002, 05:58 PM
  #19  
Flying Finn
King of Cool
Rennlist Member

 
Flying Finn's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Miami Beach, FL
Posts: 14,218
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Post

Cupcar,

That's exactly my point! I don't mind if guy next to me is driving that Porsche with all 'enchantments' that you mentioned but when those all are standard items, that makes me mad! <img src="graemlins/cussing.gif" border="0" alt="[grrrrrrr]" />

J*O said: "...The 996 is Grand Touring car right?..."

I agree & that's why I'm driving 993 (& 911) instead of 996, I like 993 (& older 911 Porsches) moe because of that reason, direction that 996 is going IMO! is wrong. Too many luxury/comfort items, too little real stuff!

I have to say though, 2002 widebody is awesome looking car! If they only could offer a model w/out all that luxury crap, in a few years, I migh have one sitting next to my 993 & 911 in my garage.
Old 05-04-2002, 06:51 PM
  #20  
Rob in WA
Cap'n Insane the Engorged
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
Rob in WA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Where Mountains Meet the Sea
Posts: 10,449
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Post

I could see all these points for a track car, but I drive my car on the street. If I were to get a track car I'd get a stripped Turbo, C2, or probably a GT2 I guess, but I'm faster then 99.9% of the other cars on the road. I don't think my Bird armrest (maybe 2 lbs) is going to make a significant difference. Plus I weigh 165 lbs and my 996 out performs the 993
I do believe Porsche should cater to purists and offer them as options, that is their heritage. I also wish I hadn't got the Nav system, but I guess that's another topic. And the SUV thing well...
Old 05-04-2002, 09:25 PM
  #21  
996FLT6
Rennlist Member
 
996FLT6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: san francisco
Posts: 14,705
Received 261 Likes on 217 Posts
Post

I wouldn't mind if PAG decides to make a race/lightweight version of the C4S or C2S(I'm dreaming) because trying to do it yourself takes $$$ and time. I know it'll probably costs more then a regular model C4S(ie 996tt vs gt2)but will save me alot of time making it that way : ). Regards. Mike
Old 05-05-2002, 10:33 AM
  #22  
Flying Finn
King of Cool
Rennlist Member

 
Flying Finn's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Miami Beach, FL
Posts: 14,218
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Post

[quote]Originally posted by J*O:
<strong>...I do believe Porsche should cater to purists and offer them as options, that is their heritage...</strong><hr></blockquote>

I think this would keep us 'purists' quiet, or at least we would complain less, I'm sure there's always other topics, like you said...

Porsche being the fastest car in the world is not the issue here (which GT2 pretty much is) there will always be supercars i.e. McLaren which will do that, although it wouldn't hurt!

For me, the nimbleness (is that a word?) is the key thing, going fast through corners, handling almost like a go-kart, huge response etc. the "fun factor" some could say, "driver's car" others.

My 911 is still more nimble and perhaps gives a bit more feedback that my 993 (and that 2.7's throttle responce is still unmatched even with todays GT2, or any other supercar), that's why I want to make it lighter & why I don't like 996 ( Porsches direction towards Touring car) as much. Don't get me wrong, I'd propably give couple of my left hand fingers if someone would give me the GT2!)

Anyway, one thing is good, we all like Porsches here! If someone likes cupholders & comfortability (again, is that a word? Sorry for my bad english <img src="graemlins/c.gif" border="0" alt="[ouch]" /> ) more than Porsche being loud, light weight etc. is fine with me, you have plenty of choise for that, for me,
I'm yelling after that lightweight model here! <img src="graemlins/crying.gif" border="0" alt="[crying]" />



Quick Reply: Cupholders - I don't get it



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 03:36 AM.