987 vs. 996 handling
#1
987 vs. 996 handling
I own a 2002 C4 Cab and have recently driven a 2005 Boxster. I love the way the Boxster handled (I know the 987 has the advantage of mid-engine design) and wondered if any set of suspension mods (M030, X74, etc) would get the 996 to the 987 level of handling.
#3
Suspension mods help a lot, but . . . . I personally am partial to the handling of the Boxster. I think that mid-engined is superior to rear-engined, so no amount of mods will make up for that difference. That said, one "flaw," if it can be called that, is that the Boxster will retain its grip (all other things being equal) far longer than a 996, but when it lets go, it spins so quickly that only the best drivers can recover. A rear engined 911 will let go much sooner, but it will give you more warning and it can be easier to control. Think in terms of dynamics and moments . . .
#4
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Simi Valley, CA
Posts: 600
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I had a Boxster S and noticed that the handling was better than my C4. I opted for the X-74 suspension. Huge difference. If you are looking for improvements in the handling area, a change in the suspension will give you what you are looking for.
#5
Had an '00 Boxster, Boxster S, and '01 996 Cab. Having recently driven a 987, I am impressed. Built my current '02 Carrera Coupe to X74/RoW M030 spec. IMHO, my car is a lot less nervous than the stock 987. It was no contest before, but advantage goes to the 3.6 996. Having had Cab, it appeared that an evoms front strut brace made things a lot crisper up front. The torsional rigidity in a Cab really needs to be bolstered, IMHO. My suspension mods cost about $1K. The Cayman is going to make the stock NA 996 a backseat-er on the track, IMHO. Talk appears to Porsche looking at the Cayman as a platform it can start running in series to help market the Porsche racing heritage via building on it. If sales do well, we will see the Boxster Coupe platform do some damage to other marques. FWIW, the turbo Boxster has already been evaluated at Weissach's test track about 4 years ago. Eyewitnesses from Kramer's board heard the blow off valves cycling while being very impressed with the exercise. I guess paranoia about cannibalized 911 sales haven't happened in 8 years, so Dr. W. is allowing performance expansion of the 98x line. The downside of this platform, as previously stated is the low polar moment of inertia. When the Box lets go, you spin like a top. A bit scarier than leaving the track backwards in classic 911 fashion, IMHO.
#6
True, the Boxster has a very low polar moment of inertia. But that's what makes it turn so quickly and effortlessly. It's the difference between skidpad numbers and slalom numbers. The Boxster transitions so easily. When I drive friends' M3, Z4, etc. with a front engine/rear wheel drive, the handling balance (F/R weight distribution) is in the same ballpark, but the cars feel heavy/slow, like I'm driving a dumbell. It is true that when you push a Boxster too far, it will let go and also spin on a dime. I just had to recalibrate my internal gyroscope to be more sensitive. I can now drive my Boxster (with some mods, of course) at 10/10 without hardly any worries. It also allows me to drive non-mid engined cars towards their limits rather easily because things happen in relative slow-motion for me compared to the Boxster.
I would say that if you have a 2004 C4, don't worry. It is a beautiful car, and will always be more prestigious than a Boxster. (Better looking than the Cayman photos IMHO.) Although, you have a weight penalty for the AWD, your extra horsepower and traction allows you to put power down a lot more reliably which is something I wish I could do. Without traction control/PSM, if I put too much power down in a corner (or in too low of a gear) in my 986S, I can easily blow the back end out and around. I'm sure your AWD allows for a lot more man-handling and fun in a lot more places. Do some aftermarket mods and you can probably satisfy your thirst for improved handling and more importantly improved fun factor.
When Porsche finally decides to put a TT or GT3 motor in a Cayman, then we can both consider upgrading and get the best of both platforms. For now, I think all 3* are too close--just slightly different personalities. *TT/GT2/GT3 excepted
I would say that if you have a 2004 C4, don't worry. It is a beautiful car, and will always be more prestigious than a Boxster. (Better looking than the Cayman photos IMHO.) Although, you have a weight penalty for the AWD, your extra horsepower and traction allows you to put power down a lot more reliably which is something I wish I could do. Without traction control/PSM, if I put too much power down in a corner (or in too low of a gear) in my 986S, I can easily blow the back end out and around. I'm sure your AWD allows for a lot more man-handling and fun in a lot more places. Do some aftermarket mods and you can probably satisfy your thirst for improved handling and more importantly improved fun factor.
When Porsche finally decides to put a TT or GT3 motor in a Cayman, then we can both consider upgrading and get the best of both platforms. For now, I think all 3* are too close--just slightly different personalities. *TT/GT2/GT3 excepted
#7
Originally Posted by arenared
Although, you have a weight penalty for the AWD, your extra horsepower and traction allows you to put power down a lot more reliably which is something I wish I could do. Without traction control/PSM, if I put too much power down in a corner (or in too low of a gear) in my 986S, I can easily blow the back end out and around.
Trending Topics
#9
Originally Posted by TD in DC
...but diversity of opinion is a good thing, right?
I am speaking from the point of view if the power in the Boxster/Cayman platform were significantly increased. At 250 HP to 300 HP, I don't think I would opt for AWD because traction control/PSM would be sufficient when I wanted it. But power in the 350 HP to 400 HP+ range (hypothetically speaking of course), I don't know. I'd probably be willing to trade off some of that HP for AWD. My basis being that it might be "a little too easy" to throttle steer the mid-engine platform. Maybe I'll change my opinion after I put in an LSD (not any time soon, unfortunately)...
Keep those ideas/comments flowing. That's why we're all here...
#10
Originally Posted by Re-animator
AWD will slow you down on a dry track, not even considering the weight penalty. 2nd that AWD on a 996 is unnecessary, coming from a 996 TT.
How do you feel about AWD the rest of the time when you are not on a dry track, i.e, wet or local backroads/highways assuming you obviously tone it down a bit. Did you ever feel that the AWD gave you that margin to push it a little more than you would have without it? Perhaps, also, the 996 is in less of an need with the rear-engine over the driving wheels.
#12
Originally Posted by arenared
Very valuable comment coming from someone having a TT.
How do you feel about AWD the rest of the time when you are not on a dry track, i.e, wet or local backroads/highways assuming you obviously tone it down a bit. Did you ever feel that the AWD gave you that margin to push it a little more than you would have without it? Perhaps, also, the 996 is in less of an need with the rear-engine over the driving wheels.
How do you feel about AWD the rest of the time when you are not on a dry track, i.e, wet or local backroads/highways assuming you obviously tone it down a bit. Did you ever feel that the AWD gave you that margin to push it a little more than you would have without it? Perhaps, also, the 996 is in less of an need with the rear-engine over the driving wheels.
#13
Originally Posted by Re-animator
The power was intoxicating. ... Let's see how much willpower one needs...
Sorry, porch, for taking this thread off on an AWD/HP tangent. Now, back to our regularly scheduled thread. I love my TRG/GT3 sway bars. There are a lot of other mods you can do. Also, don't underestimate the importance of alignment in terms of feel.
#14
Originally Posted by arenared
Sorry, porch, for taking this thread off on an AWD/HP tangent. Now, back to our regularly scheduled thread. I love my TRG/GT3 sway bars. There are a lot of other mods you can do. Also, don't underestimate the importance of alignment in terms of feel.
As for the suspension... I just found the 987 handling so amazing compared to my stock 996 suspension - no comparison and frankly somewhat disconcerting. I've heard raves about the transformation that the x74 suspension makes but didn't know where that would get me relative to the 987. That thing was just soooooooo nimble.
#15
Originally Posted by Re-animator
Had an '00 Boxster, Boxster S, and '01 996 Cab. Having recently driven a 987, I am impressed. Built my current '02 Carrera Coupe to X74/RoW M030 spec. IMHO, my car is a lot less nervous than the stock 987. It was no contest before, but advantage goes to the 3.6 996. Having had Cab, it appeared that an evoms front strut brace made things a lot crisper up front. The torsional rigidity in a Cab really needs to be bolstered, IMHO. My suspension mods cost about $1K. The Cayman is going to make the stock NA 996 a backseat-er on the track, IMHO. Talk appears to Porsche looking at the Cayman as a platform it can start running in series to help market the Porsche racing heritage via building on it. If sales do well, we will see the Boxster Coupe platform do some damage to other marques. FWIW, the turbo Boxster has already been evaluated at Weissach's test track about 4 years ago. Eyewitnesses from Kramer's board heard the blow off valves cycling while being very impressed with the exercise. I guess paranoia about cannibalized 911 sales haven't happened in 8 years, so Dr. W. is allowing performance expansion of the 98x line. The downside of this platform, as previously stated is the low polar moment of inertia. When the Box lets go, you spin like a top. A bit scarier than leaving the track backwards in classic 911 fashion, IMHO.