performance software/flash
#17
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by washington dc porsche
Video of a 996 with a GIAC.
http://videos.streetfire.net/player....8-16471A3F3DFA
http://videos.streetfire.net/player....8-16471A3F3DFA
#19
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by a911driver
I am testing a Revo map on my 00 996. You get five hours of driving time. It takes about five or six hard accelerations to train the new map and then it does feel different. My initial impressions is smoother power distribution throughout the curve (and maybe more power). I'll come back with more impressions over the weekend. I think I will know the difference when it reverts back to the original mapping.
![Wink](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/smilies/wink.gif)
#21
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by arenared
Is that 5 hours of clock time or 5 hours of engine time? I am very interested in your opinions. Do you have a G-meter by any chance to get some objective data? Also, you are SF Bay area. Did you use Carlsen? Sorry for so many questions ![Wink](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/smilies/wink.gif)
![Wink](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/smilies/wink.gif)
I don't have a G-meter, so I am judging seat of the pants. I think I will know more when it reverts back. Revo attracted me due to its simplicity.