Notices
996 Forum 1999-2005
Sponsored by:

Bumpstop Issues With PSS9's

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-27-2005, 11:02 AM
  #1  
Dale Gribble
Pocket Sand
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
Dale Gribble's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Ask Rusty Shackleford.
Posts: 7,649
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Bumpstop Issues With PSS9's

Last question b4 i buy them.
under what circumstances will i hit the bumpstops. Bearing in mind that i'm not going for the "lowridah" look, just a bit of lowering, maybe to factory X73 spec plus minus/depending on road condition.
Old 02-27-2005, 07:13 PM
  #2  
TT Surgeon
Race Director
 
TT Surgeon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: KC ex pat marooned in NY
Posts: 13,005
Likes: 0
Received 17 Likes on 17 Posts
Default

I would stick with factory stuff, m030, x73/74, can't go wrong.
Old 02-27-2005, 09:25 PM
  #3  
karlooz
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
karlooz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: SF bay area, CA
Posts: 2,094
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by DeAd-EyE
Last question b4 i buy them.
under what circumstances will i hit the bumpstops. Bearing in mind that i'm not going for the "lowridah" look, just a bit of lowering, maybe to factory X73 spec plus minus/depending on road condition.
i haven't heard of any bumpstop problems with NA996s. i think you can go with gt3 ride height and be OK.

i've heard of the problems on 996TT that have been lowered to gt2 specs. the problems arose during extreme cornering and the strut was compressed to the bumpstops resulting in zero suspension travel thereby destabilizing the car.
Old 02-27-2005, 09:31 PM
  #4  
karlooz
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
karlooz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: SF bay area, CA
Posts: 2,094
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by C4S Surgeon
I would stick with factory stuff, m030, x73/74, can't go wrong.
ROW m030 not much bang for the buck IMHO.. too much like stock. US m030 is kinda a waste of money.

can't do x74 on pre '02 cars.

pss9s are great cause you can fine tune the shock settings for the street and the track.
Old 02-27-2005, 11:49 PM
  #5  
arenared
Burning Brakes
 
arenared's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,162
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Actually, except for steady-state cruising, you are usually on the bumpstops in the stock configuration. With the RoW 030, I think you are on the front bumpstops all the time. Technically, they are not bumpstops but foam rubber "additional springs" as Porsche calls them. They are a part of modern OE suspension design. The factory springs are about 200lbs/in, so you cannot obviously have 3" of suspension travel when you slam on the brakes. I don't recall the exact numbers, but PSS9s are in the 400 to 500 range. I really don't know what happens to the bumpstops on PSS9s. It would depend on the height of the shock housing vs. the ride height--a fairly complex and interactive arrangement to make generalizations about.
Old 02-28-2005, 12:11 PM
  #6  
SPR
Drifting
 
SPR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: CA
Posts: 2,272
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

1. You are not on the bumpstops all the time 2. Pss9's have internal bumpstops. Ride height does limit your overall travel range of course.
Old 03-01-2005, 12:43 AM
  #7  
mastermind
Advanced
 
mastermind's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: milwaukee, wi., usa
Posts: 98
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I run my C4 about 10mm below GT3 ride height... can't say I've ever had any strange handling problems. This includes the odd trackday and many autox.

My biggest problem is transversing driveways!

t
Old 03-01-2005, 12:43 AM
  #8  
arenared
Burning Brakes
 
arenared's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,162
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SPR
1. You are not on the bumpstops all the time 2. Pss9's have internal bumpstops. Ride height does limit your overall travel range of course.
1. Under what conditions do you say "not...all the time"? If you say stock, then that's not what I claimed. If your claim is "essentially never", then I challenge you to take out the additional springs (bumpstops) and see how it affects your handling. With the US/030/ RoW stock-type suspensions, they are an integral part of the suspension function.

2. What "internal bumpstops" are you referring to? Do you mean internal to the shock? I think not.
Old 03-01-2005, 12:55 AM
  #9  
TT Surgeon
Race Director
 
TT Surgeon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: KC ex pat marooned in NY
Posts: 13,005
Likes: 0
Received 17 Likes on 17 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by karlooz
ROW m030 not much bang for the buck IMHO.. too much like stock. US m030 is kinda a waste of money.

can't do x74 on pre '02 cars.

pss9s are great cause you can fine tune the shock settings for the street and the track.
I think you would see big bump in handling in going with the row 030, some guys who have done that can chime in, Doug help me out here.
Chris
Old 03-01-2005, 12:58 AM
  #10  
Darren
Burning Brakes
 
Darren's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Malvern, Pa.
Posts: 1,050
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The PSS9 has internal bump-stops. The PSS9 isn't a full race suspension, its a middle-of-the-road solution that gives you pretty good track performance and a great street ride (better than OEM IMO). In my setup, with my car lowered 1" or so front and rear, I have never hit the bump stops on the track or on the street that I could notice. If you are lowering the car more than that, either you are being too aggressive than necessary for DE or you really should be buying an all-out race setup.
Old 03-01-2005, 01:12 AM
  #11  
SPR
Drifting
 
SPR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: CA
Posts: 2,272
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

The smaller tender springs are helper springs and are not bumpstops they make sure that the main spring stays seated on the collar at all times of extension-
Old 03-01-2005, 01:22 AM
  #12  
Darren
Burning Brakes
 
Darren's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Malvern, Pa.
Posts: 1,050
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Yes, normally at cruise you are riding on the helper spring, which is considerably less stiff than the main spring. This is why the PSS9 rides so nice. At the track, that helper quickly bottoms out and then the main spring takes over. You can't even barely feel the transition, but in a full race setup you wouldn't have the helper.
Old 03-01-2005, 01:43 AM
  #13  
SPR
Drifting
 
SPR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: CA
Posts: 2,272
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

If you look at the helper springs they are actually completely compressed at static ride- They really perform no progressive function other than maybe rebounding and holding the main spring on the collar- I was surprised when I saw but by reading the material it denotes just that function
Old 03-01-2005, 04:14 AM
  #14  
Darren
Burning Brakes
 
Darren's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Malvern, Pa.
Posts: 1,050
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

You can't infer static ride from the car standing still. Even so, my car doesn't completely compress the helper springs while standing still. If the purpose was solely to keep the springs on their perches, then the strut shaft would be shorter, or the main spring would be longer. If the helper is fully compressed, then it does nothing, and there would be no reason for Bilstein to put a spring there -- they could make the main spring longer. Helper springs are characteristic of hybrid/compromise struts.

An informed friend taught me "if the factory put it there, then it serves a purpose". They are certainly not in the business of making extra parts.
Old 03-01-2005, 05:15 AM
  #15  
riotgear
Rennlist Member
 
riotgear's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 769
Received 481 Likes on 211 Posts
Default

I am considering lowering my 997 1.25" all around with the PSS9 kit. Is that too aggressive?


Quick Reply: Bumpstop Issues With PSS9's



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 03:16 PM.