Notices
996 Forum 1999-2005
Sponsored by:

Need help with alignment specs.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-19-2004, 08:04 AM
  #1  
NickS
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
NickS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,024
Received 94 Likes on 58 Posts
Default Need help with alignment specs.

Standard C2 with 225/40-18's. Porsche says 0 degree +/- 15' but I would think having negative camber up front would be a good thing. I drive the car as it was intended to be driven and do 3-4 DE's a year.
Old 10-19-2004, 12:49 PM
  #2  
RJFabCab
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
RJFabCab's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: NC - One headlight capital of the world
Posts: 1,820
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

Nick,

What suspension are you running? Your camber adjustments will be severely limited on a stock setup.

I can only get about -0.8 up front and -1.5 in rear with the RoW 030. You may want to consider the RoW sport specs as listed in the Porsche technical manual.
Old 10-19-2004, 02:41 PM
  #3  
NickS
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
NickS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,024
Received 94 Likes on 58 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RJFabCab
Nick,

What suspension are you running? Your camber adjustments will be severely limited on a stock setup.

I can only get about -0.8 up front and -1.5 in rear with the RoW 030. You may want to consider the RoW sport specs as listed in the Porsche technical manual.
I have stock suspension AFAIK.

I had -1.2 camber up front and -2.1 camber in the rear before my alignment. I used an alignment spec I found on Rennlist and went by that.

I now have 0.0 camber up front and -1.2 camber in the rear. The front end doesn't feel as planted as before. I am thinking that I will go back to -1 for front camber and see if that makes it better. I changed the rear settings because I was eating through rear tires.

I think the person that owned this car before me had different suspension on the car #1 because of the alignment setting and #2 because the front fenders have been rolled.
Old 10-19-2004, 02:46 PM
  #4  
Viken
Keeper of the Truth
Lifetime Rennlist
Member

 
Viken's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: So Cal
Posts: 6,486
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Go for -1° in front and -1° 20' at rear. A 20' differential front to back is just about ideal.
Old 10-19-2004, 02:54 PM
  #5  
NickS
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
NickS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,024
Received 94 Likes on 58 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Viken
Go for -1° in front and -1° 20' at rear. A 20' differential front to back is just about ideal.
Yeap. That is what I planned on doing.

What about front and rear toe settings? Should the rear even have any? It's currently set at .05° in the front (total is .10°) and .12° in the rear (total s .25°).
Old 10-19-2004, 05:50 PM
  #6  
Darren
Burning Brakes
 
Darren's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Malvern, Pa.
Posts: 1,050
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I'm running -1.4' front camber (as much as you can get evenly) and -2.5' rear camber (PSS9). For my driving style on the track, this seems about correct. I need more camber in the front though, the outside edge of the tire gets pretty hot. The rears are wearing evenly, and the tire temps are even. The tires wear on the street of course, so I don't buy $200/each street tires. I'm just driving the Dunlop SP Sport Race on street/track, no more changing wheels at the track and $130 each....wohoo!

From another post -- the 2004 GT3 spec is:

Front axle height: 115 + 5mm (115 to 120mm)
Rear axle height: 128 + 5mm (128 to 133mm)

Front axle:
Toe unpressed (total): +8' +/- 2'
Toe difference at 20° lock: -1°30' +/- 30'
Camber: -1° +/- 5'
Max camber difference, left/right: 10'
Caster: 8° +/- 30'
Max caster difference, left/right: 40'

Rear axle:
Toe per wheel: +13' +/- 2'
Max toe difference, left/right: 5'
Camber: -1°50' +/- 5'
Max camber difference, left/right: 10'
Old 10-20-2004, 08:23 AM
  #7  
NickS
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
NickS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,024
Received 94 Likes on 58 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Darren
I'm running -1.4' front camber (as much as you can get evenly) and -2.5' rear camber (PSS9). For my driving style on the track, this seems about correct. I need more camber in the front though, the outside edge of the tire gets pretty hot. The rears are wearing evenly, and the tire temps are even. The tires wear on the street of course, so I don't buy $200/each street tires. I'm just driving the Dunlop SP Sport Race on street/track, no more changing wheels at the track and $130 each....wohoo!
I have the stock suspension and the previous rear camber setting was -2.5 and it wore through the 2 inside treads too fast. Maybe with the lowered suspension you are able to run more camber?

Thanks for the Alignment specs. I'm going to go with -1 camber on the fronts and adjust the toe a bit.
Old 10-20-2004, 10:10 AM
  #8  
Darren
Burning Brakes
 
Darren's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Malvern, Pa.
Posts: 1,050
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I could only get about -.8' in front before it was lowered. That was better than 0', but it just wasn't enough. That was why I bought the PSS9, so I could lower the car and add more negative camber. -2.5' rear is definately overkill on the street, and might be on the track as well. In your case, I'd just get as much as possible out of the front, move the struts all the way in, and then go with -1.5' or so rear. Good luck!



Quick Reply: Need help with alignment specs.



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 12:21 AM.