996 vs. 997
#1
Track Day
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Having spent the past 2 weeks reading every post on this board, I find it funny that there is such a seperation between "old school" Porsche enthusiasts and newer enthusiasts, especially when it comes to 993, 996, 997 models.
It reminds of the BMW boards for the 7, 5, and 6 series cars.
While there are a ton of folks who feel the styling on the new BMWs is awful, no one denies that the cars are mechanically and structurally better, a complete advancement over the previous generation cars. And styling is such a subjective area.
In regards to Porsche, you cannot deny that the 996 is a much better car than the 993. It has more power (water-cooled, but still more power), handles better, better reliability, more comfort, a better all-around p-car.
The styling is subjective, I personally think the 996 is the best looking Porsche evr made. The 997 is probably a better all-around car (in S form), but the looks are also subjective.
I like tradition, but stepping back is the wrong move for Porsche.
It reminds of the BMW boards for the 7, 5, and 6 series cars.
While there are a ton of folks who feel the styling on the new BMWs is awful, no one denies that the cars are mechanically and structurally better, a complete advancement over the previous generation cars. And styling is such a subjective area.
In regards to Porsche, you cannot deny that the 996 is a much better car than the 993. It has more power (water-cooled, but still more power), handles better, better reliability, more comfort, a better all-around p-car.
The styling is subjective, I personally think the 996 is the best looking Porsche evr made. The 997 is probably a better all-around car (in S form), but the looks are also subjective.
I like tradition, but stepping back is the wrong move for Porsche.
#2
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally posted by Jaws
In regards to Porsche, you cannot deny that the 996 is a much better car than the 993. It has more power (water-cooled, but still more power), handles better, better reliability, more comfort, a better all-around p-car.
In regards to Porsche, you cannot deny that the 996 is a much better car than the 993. It has more power (water-cooled, but still more power), handles better, better reliability, more comfort, a better all-around p-car.
#3
Drifting
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 3,199
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I'm not so sure about the reliability issue. I'm no fan of the 996 engine design, lack of traditional dry sump etc..., but mine has been very reliable throughout the last 5 years with lots of track time. On the other hand the 993 has not been without problems, for example wiring harness defects and CEL that are not minor repairs. I think it remains to be seen how the 996 wil play out in terms of long term 100K plus milage reliability, but I believe the jury is out on the 993 too. The 3.2(?) SC s are probably the bench mark for 911 longevity. Don't get me wrong the 993 is a wonderful car, I still kick myself for not buying one new, I don't want this to turn into a 993 vs 996 thing.
BTW I love your 993TT, one of these days I'll get one of those beasts.
BTW I love your 993TT, one of these days I'll get one of those beasts.
![bigbye](https://rennlist.com/forums/graemlins/xyxwave.gif)